Comparative analysis of surface roughness algorithms for the identification of active landslides

Abstract Parameters correlated to surface roughness are quite commonly used to describe landslide activity in quantitative geomorphology. Previous studies proved that topographic roughness is closely related to both landslide mechanics and features. A number of different techniques have emerged over the years to describe quantitatively the great variety of landforms and processes that affect unstable slopes. In this work we perform a comparative analysis of several methods used in literature to compute surface roughness (root mean square applied to elevation and slope grids, eigenvalue ratios, semivariance, discrete Fourier transform, continuous wavelet transform and wavelet lifting scheme) in order to evaluate quantitatively which algorithms are best suited to discriminate active landslides and to predict them for automated mapping purposes. A first test was carried out on artificial surfaces simulating different roughness patterns encountered in nature, so to highlight advantages and limits in controlled conditions. Then, the algorithms were applied to LiDAR datasets of two earth flow case studies in the Northern Apennines, Italy. Results obtained by using “effect-size” statistical test to objectively quantify the capability of the different algorithms of discriminating active landslide slopes from other slope types showed that most algorithms perform reasonably well and that simple techniques (RMS-based and wavelet lifting scheme) achieve equal or sometimes even better results that more complex ones. Results from the use of roughness indexes for the prediction of landslide slopes in automated mapping showed that non-forested active slopes could be predicted by most methods with an accuracy greater than 85% and that most methods had a 15% drop in prediction accuracy in forested active slopes. Results also proved that increasing the size of the moving window has minor beneficial effects in predictive capability, suggesting that small size of pixels and moving windows should be used to retain a full resolution of surface conditions in slopes.

[1]  Michael P. Bishop,et al.  Geographic Information Science and Mountain Geomorphology , 2004 .

[2]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  LiDAR And Hyperspectral Data Integration For Landslide Monitoring: The Test Case Of Valoria Landslide , 2010 .

[5]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  The Valoria landslide reactivation in 2005–2006 (Northern Apennines, Italy) , 2007 .

[6]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Self-Affine Time Series: I. Generation and Analyses , 1999 .

[7]  W. Sweldens.  The Lifting Scheme: A Custom - Design Construction of Biorthogonal Wavelets "Industrial Mathematics , 1996 .

[8]  D. J. Chadwick,et al.  Analysis of LiDAR-derived topographic information for characterizing and differentiating landslide morphology and activity , 2006 .

[9]  Richard J. Pike,et al.  The geometric signature: Quantifying landslide-terrain types from digital elevation models , 1988 .

[10]  R. Reyment,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. , 1988 .

[11]  A. H. Chowdhury,et al.  On natural rock joint profile characterization using self-affine fractal approach , 1995 .

[12]  R. D. Hobson.  Surface roughness in topography: quantitative approach , 2019, Spatial Analysis in Geomorphology.

[13]  P. C. McWilliams,et al.  Ambiguities in estimating fractal dimensions of rock fracture surfaces , 1990 .

[14]  Michael P. Bishop,et al.  Remote Sensing and Geomorphometry for Studying Relief Production in High Mountains , 2003 .

[15]  Betty L. Hickman,et al.  Scale-dependent analysis of satellite imagery for characterization of glacier surfaces in the Karakoram Himalaya , 1998 .

[16]  Vijanth S. Asirvadam,et al.  A method for computation of surface roughness of digital elevation model terrains via multiscale analysis , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  N. Tate.  Maximum entropy spectral analysis for the estimation of fractals in topography , 1998 .

[18]  J. McKean,et al.  Objective landslide detection and surface morphology mapping using high-resolution airborne laser altimetry , 2004 .

[19]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  Estimating mass-wasting processes in active earth slides – earth flows with time-series of High-Resolution DEMs from photogrammetry and airborne LiDAR , 2009 .

[20]  J. Roering,et al.  Automated landslide mapping using spectral analysis and high-resolution topographic data: Puget Sound lowlands, Washington, and Portland Hills, Oregon , 2008 .

[21]  T. Farr,et al.  The roughness of natural terrain: A planetary and remote sensing perspective , 2001 .

[22]  L. Miska,et al.  Evaluation of current statistical approaches for predictive geomorphological mapping , 2005 .

[23]  Peter Axelsson,et al.  Processing of laser scanner data-algorithms and applications , 1999 .

[24]  Carlos Henrique Grohmann,et al.  Morphometric analysis in geographic information systems: applications of free software GRASS and R , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[25]  Bill Morris,et al.  The effects of scale on fractal dimension of topography: a case study from Sudbury, Ontario, Canada , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[26]  M. Eeckhaut,et al.  The effectiveness of hillshade maps and expert knowledge in mapping old deep-seated landslides , 2005 .

[27]  Alessandro Simoni,et al.  Field evidence of pore pressure diffusion in clayey soils prone to landsliding , 2010 .

[28]  James W. Head,et al.  Kilometer‐scale slopes on Mars and their correlation with geologic units: Initial results from Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) data , 1999 .

[29]  M. Shepard,et al.  Self‐affine (fractal) topography: Surface parameterization and radar scattering , 1995 .

[30]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[31]  I. Evans.  Local aspect asymmetry of mountain glaciation: A global survey of consistency of favoured directions for glacier numbers and altitudes , 2006 .

[32]  P. Kulatilake,et al.  Requirements for accurate quantification of self-affine roughness using the variogram method , 1998 .

[33]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[34]  Francesco Troiani,et al.  Geomorphological response of fluvial and coastal terraces to Quaternary tectonics and climate as revealed by geostatistical topographic analysis , 2011 .

[35]  Olejnik,et al.  Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[36]  K. L. Frankel,et al.  Characterizing arid region alluvial fan surface roughness with airborne laser swath mapping digital topographic data , 2007 .

[37]  J. Guinan,et al.  Multiscale Terrain Analysis of Multibeam Bathymetry Data for Habitat Mapping on the Continental Slope , 2007 .

[38]  T. Hengl,et al.  Geomorphometry: Concepts, software, applications , 2009 .

[39]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[40]  Bedrock surface roughness and the distribution of subglacially precipitated carbonate deposits : Implications for formation at Glacier de Tsanfleuron, Switzerland , 1998 .

[41]  Lorenzo Marchi,et al.  Characterisation of the surface morphology of an alpine alluvial fan using airborne LiDAR , 2008 .

[42]  Lorenzo Marchi,et al.  Variogram maps from LiDAR data as fingerprints of surface morphology on scree slopes , 2009 .