Optimal reinforcement of RC columns for biaxial bending

The Reinforcement Sizing Diagram (RSD) approach to determining optimal reinforcement for reinforced concrete beam and column sections subjected to uniaxial bending is extended to the case of biaxial bending. Conventional constraints on the distribution of longitudinal reinforcement are relaxed, leading to an infinite number of reinforcement solutions, from which the optimal solution and a corresponding quasi-optimal pragmatic is determined. First, all possibilities of reinforcement arrangements are considered for a biaxial loading, including symmetric and non-symmetric configurations, subject to the constraint that the reinforcement is located in a single layer near the circumference of the section. This theoretical approach establishes the context for obtaining pragmatic distributions of reinforcement that are more suitable for construction, in which distributions having double symmetry are considered. This contrasts with conventional approaches for the design of column reinforcement, in which a predetermined distribution of longitudinal reinforcement is assumed, even though such a distribution generally is non-optimal in any given design. Column and wall sections that are subjected to uniaxial or biaxial loading may be designed using this method. The solutions are displayed using a biaxial RSD and can be obtained with relatively simple algorithms implemented in widely accessible software programs such as Mathematica® and Excel®. Several examples illustrate the method and the savings in reinforcement that can be obtained relative to conventional solutions.

[1]  M. Y. Rafiq,et al.  Genetic algorithms in optimal design and detailing of reinforced concrete biaxial columns supported by a declarative approach for capacity checking , 1998 .

[2]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Prestressed concrete structures , 1991 .

[3]  James G. MacGregor,et al.  Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design , 1996 .

[4]  B. Bresler Design Criteria for Reinforced Columns under Axial Load and Biaxial Bending , 1960 .

[5]  R. W. Furlong,et al.  Analysis and Design of Concrete Columns for Biaxial Bending-Overview , 2004 .

[6]  Luisa María Gil-Martín,et al.  DESIGN OF CONCRETE MEMBERS SUBJECTED TO UNIAXIAL BENDING AND COMPRESSION USING REINFORCEMENT SIZING DIAGRAMS , 2005 .

[7]  Luisa María Gil-Martín,et al.  Optimum RC column reinforcement considering multiple load combinations , 2009 .

[8]  I. W. Liu An approximate resizing system for the preliminary design of reinforced concrete frames , 1998 .

[9]  Luisa María Gil-Martín,et al.  Design of Optimally Reinforced RC Beam, Column, and Wall Sections , 2008 .

[10]  Michal Šejnoha,et al.  New approach to optimization of reinforced concrete beams , 2000 .

[11]  Mohammad R. Ehsani,et al.  Cad For Columns , 1986 .

[12]  Edward Cohen,et al.  Guide for Ultimate Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete , 1956 .

[13]  Luisa María Gil-Martín,et al.  Optimal domains for strength design of rectangular sections for axial load and moment according to Eurocode 2 , 2007 .

[14]  Luisa María Gil-Martín,et al.  Pilotes asimétricos para contención de tierras , 2010 .

[15]  Manuel L. Romero,et al.  Design method for slender columns subjected to biaxial bending based on second-order eccentricity , 2007 .

[16]  Luisa María Gil-Martín,et al.  Impact of optimal longitudinal reinforcement on the curvature ductility capacity of reinforced concrete column sections , 2004 .

[17]  Kenneth M. Leet Reinforced Concrete Design , 1982 .