Intellectual property law compliance in Europe: Illegal file sharing and the role of social norms

The current study empirically demonstrates the widely discussed gap between copyright law and social norms. Theoretically founded in the sociology of law, the study uses a well-defined concept of norms to quantitatively measure changes in the strength of social norms before and after the implementation of legislation. The ‘IPRED law’ was implemented in Sweden on 1 April 2009, as a result of the EU IPR Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EC. It aims at enforcing copyright, as well as other IP rights, when they are violated, especially online. A survey was conducted three months before the IPRED law came into force, and it was repeated six months later. The approximately one thousand respondents between fifteen and twenty-five years-of-age showed, among other things, that although actual file-sharing behaviour had to some extent decreased in frequency, social norms remained unaffected by the law.

[1]  V. Braithwaite.  Dancing with Tax Authorities: Motivational Postures and Non-Compliant Actions , 2003 .

[2]  Robert C. Ellickson.  Law and Economics Discovers Social Norms , 1998, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[3]  Mark F. Schultz.  Fear and Norms and Rock & Roll: What Jambands Can Teach Us about Persuading People to Obey Copyright Law , 2005 .

[4]  S. Larsson,et al.  Compliance or Obscurity? Online Anonymity as a Consequence of Fighting Unauthorised File-sharing , 2010 .

[5]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  Is music downloading the new prohibition? What students reveal through an ethical dilemma , 2009, Ethics and Information Technology.

[6]  O. Goodenough,et al.  Why do Good People Steal Intellectual Property , 2008 .

[7]  An Introduction to the Study of Society , 1972 .

[8]  Peter K. Yu.  Intellectual Property and Information Wealth : Issues and Practices in the Digital Age , 2006 .

[9]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[10]  M. Sherif.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[11]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy , 2008 .

[12]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[13]  John Tehranian,et al.  Infringement Nation: Copyright Reform and the Law/Norm Gap , 2007 .

[14]  I. Ajzen.  Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[15]  Steve Rytina,et al.  Social Consensus on Norms of Justice: Should the Punishment Fit the Crime? , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Christopher A. Jensen.  THE MORE THINGS CHANGE, THE MORE THEY STAY THE SAME: COPYRIGHT, DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, AND SOCIAL NORMS , 2003 .

[17]  Lior Strahilevitz,et al.  Charismatic Code, Social Norms, and the Emergence of Cooperation on the File-Swapping Networks , 2003 .

[18]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  SOCIAL NORMS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Online norms and the European legal development , 2009 .

[19]  Janice Nadler,et al.  The Law and Norms of File Sharing , 2006 .

[20]  Stefan Larsson.  The Path Dependence of European Copyright , 2011 .

[21]  Hans Kelsen,et al.  The Pure Theory of Law , 1968 .

[22]  E. Cheng.  Structural Laws and the Puzzle of Regulating Behavior , 2005 .

[23]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[24]  Joakim Schrevelius.  "Synpunkter på EU-harmoniseringen av svensk upphovsrättslagstiftning". En uppsats om ändringarna i URL 2005, (Lag (1960:729) om upphovsrätt till litterära och konstnärliga verk) och hur de uppfattas av olika organisationer verksamma inom området. , 2006 .

[25]  G. E. Vincent,et al.  Introduction to the study of society, an , 1894 .

[26]  Robert C. Ellickson,et al.  Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes , 1991 .

[27]  E. Durkheim,et al.  Rules of Sociological Method , 1964 .

[28]  Steven Shavell,et al.  The Fairness of Sanctions: Some Implications for Optimal Enforcement Policy , 1998 .

[29]  Jane Secker,et al.  Digital Copyright , 2006, Program.

[30]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach , 2009 .

[31]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[32]  Twila Wingrove,et al.  Why were millions of people not obeying the law? Motivational influences on non-compliance with the law in the case of music piracy , 2011 .

[33]  Okechukwu Benjamin Vincents.  When Rights Clash Online: The Tracking of P2p Copyright Infringements Vs. the EC Personal Data Directive , 2008, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[34]  John N. Drobak.  Norms and the law , 2006 .

[35]  S. Larsson.  Metaphors and Norms - Understanding Copyright Law in a Digital Society , 2011 .

[36]  Geraldine Szott Moohr.  The Crime of Copyright Infringement: An Inquiry Based on Morality, Harm, and Criminal Theory , 2009 .

[37]  Robert C. Ellickson.  The Evolution of Social Norms: A Perspective from the Legal Academy , 1999 .

[38]  L. Strahilevitz.  Social Norms from Close-Knit Groups to Loose-Knit Groups , 2003 .

[39]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Situativity and Symbols: Response to Vera and Simon , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  C. Varga,et al.  Law and Society , 2015, Law and Life. Why Law?.

[41]  Måns Svensson,et al.  The Concept of Norms in Sociology of Law , 2008 .

[42]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[43]  Mark F. Schultz.  Copynorms: Copyright and Social Norms , 2006 .

[44]  J. Greeno.  A perspective on thinking. , 1989 .

[45]  Essence and accident , 1966 .