Parameters Affecting the Sustainability Trade-off between Production and Use Stages in the Automotive Lightweight Design

Abstract Nowadays, lightweight materials and design is one of the means carmakers employ to reduce CO2 emissions according to EU's goals and sustainability principles. In this paper, a comparative analysis between alternative design solutions for Electric Vehicles (EVs) components was carried out using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC) methodologies to evaluate the trade-off between impacts from production and use stages. This work is part of the activities of the ENLIGHT European Green Vehicles project, where the objective was to advance highly innovative lightweight material technologies for application in EVs structural parts. The purposes of the study are: i) to evaluate the parameters influencing the trade-off from the environmental and economic perspective; ii) to combine LCA and LCC results interpretations. The results stressed that the trade-off becomes much more sensitive when innovative materials and technologies are applied to EVs lightweighting.

[1]  Mohammed A. Omar,et al.  Life cycle assessment-based selection for a sustainable lightweight body-in-white design , 2012 .

[2]  C. A. Bernardo,et al.  Integrating environmental and economic life cycle analysis in product development: a material selection case study , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Environmental impact minimisation in an automotive component using alternative materials and manufacturing processes , 2011 .

[4]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice , 2011 .

[5]  Sujit Das,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental evaluation of downsized vs. lightweight material automotive engines , 2014 .

[6]  Hyung Chul Kim,et al.  Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission benefits of lightweighting in automobiles: review and harmonization. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Hong-Seok Park,et al.  Development of plastic front side panels for green cars , 2013 .

[8]  D. Morrey,et al.  A coherent life cycle assessment of a range of lightweighting strategies for compact vehicles , 2015 .

[9]  Armando Caldeira-Pires,et al.  Environmental benefits of substituting talc by sugarcane bagasse fibers as reinforcement in polypropylene composites: Ecodesign and LCA as strategy for automotive components , 2010 .

[10]  Sujit Das Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites , 2011 .

[11]  Cheryl Caffrey,et al.  Critical factors affecting life cycle assessments of material choice for vehicle mass reduction. , 2017, Transportation research. Part D, Transport and environment.