High Quality Sensor Placement for SHM Systems: Refocusing on Application Demands

There are heavy studies recently on applying wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring. These works usually focus on the computer science aspect, and the considerations include energy consumption, network connectivity, etc. It is commonly believed that for the current resource limited wireless sensors, system design could be more efficient if the application requirements are incorporated. Nevertheless, we often find that, rather than integration, assumptions have to be made due to lack of knowledge of civil engineering; for example, to evaluate routing algorithms, the sensor placement is assumed to be random or on grids/trees. These may not be practically meaningful to the respective application demands, and make the great efforts by the computer science community on developing efficient methods from the sensor network aspect less useful. In this paper, we study the very first problem of the SHM systems: the sensor placement and focus on the civil requirements. We first study the current general framework of structure health monitoring. We redevelop the framework that includes a new sensor placement module. This module implements the most widely accepted sensor placement scheme from civil engineering but focusing on its usefulness for computer science. It provides such interfaces that can rank the placement quality of the candidate locations in a step by step manner. We then optimize system performance by considering network connectivity and data routing issues; with the objective on energy efficiency. We evaluate our scheme using the data from the structural health monitoring system on the Ting Kau Bridge, Hong Kong. We show that a uniform and a state-of-the-art placement are not very meaningful in placement quality. Our scheme achieves almost the same sensor placement quality with that of the civil engineering with five-fold improvement in system lifetime. We conduct an experiment on the in-built Guangzhou New TV Tower, China; and the results validate the effectiveness of our scheme.

[1]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[2]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Energy conserving routing in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[3]  C. Guestrin,et al.  Near-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[4]  Renjie Huang,et al.  Air-dropped sensor network for real-time high-fidelity volcano monitoring , 2009, MobiSys '09.

[5]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Impact of network density on data aggregation in wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[6]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  Relay node deployment strategies in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks: multiple-hop communication case , 2005, 2005 Second Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2005. IEEE SECON 2005..

[7]  James Demmel,et al.  Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructures Using Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[8]  D. Kammer Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[9]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Design Guidelines for Maximizing Lifetime and Avoiding Energy Holes in Sensor Networks with Uniform Distribution and Uniform Reporting , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[10]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Smart sensing technology: opportunities and challenges , 2004 .

[11]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Technology innovation in developing the structural health monitoring system for Guangzhou New TV Tower , 2009 .

[12]  Bo Li,et al.  Demo : On the High Quality Sensor Placement for Structural Health Monitoring , 2009 .

[13]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Maximum lifetime routing in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[14]  Chenyang Lu,et al.  A Holistic Approach to Decentralized Structural Damage Localization Using Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 Real-Time Systems Symposium.

[15]  K. Chintalapudi,et al.  Structural damage detection and localization using NETSHM , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[16]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  A wireless sensor network For structural monitoring , 2004, SenSys '04.

[17]  H. F. Zhou,et al.  Modal Flexibility Analysis of Cable‐Stayed Ting Kau Bridge for Damage Identification , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[18]  Dan Wang,et al.  Double Mobility: Coverage of the Sea Surface with Mobile Sensor Networks , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[19]  Mario Gerla,et al.  The Meandering Current Mobility Model and its Impact on Underwater Mobile Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[20]  John Anderson,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring , 2002, WSNA '02.