The Optimal Angle of Needle Insertion for Caudal Block in Adults

Background: This study was conducted to investigate the optimal angle of needle insertion during caudal epidural injection in chronic low back pain patients using ultrasound imaging. Methods: One hundred eight patients (40 male and 68 female patients) with low back pain and sciatica were studied. Soft tissue ultrasonography was performed to identify the sacral hiatus. The optimal angle of the needle to the skin was measured with an imaginary line drawn parallel to the sacral base using a protractor on a longitudinal plane. A 22-gauge caudal epidural needle was inserted and was guided by ultrasound to the sacral hiatus and into the caudal epidural space. Results: The mean ± SD for the intercornual distance, depth of the caudal space and the thickness of the sacrococcygeal membrane were 19.0 ± 3.2 mm, 3.6 ± 0.9 mm and 1.8 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. The optimal angle showed a significant correlation with the depth of the caudal space and the thickness of the sacrococcygeal membrane. The mean ± SD for the optimal angle of the needle insertion was 23.5 ± 6.9 degrees. Conclusions: We conclude that the needle should be inserted at an angle of approximately 23.5 degrees to the skin in order to avoid injury to the periosteum and an inadvertent intra-osseous injection. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2008; 54: 295∼9)

[1]  David L. Brown Spinal, Epidural, and Caudal Anesthesia , 2010 .

[2]  N. Şenoğlu,et al.  Landmarks of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  Ronald D. Miller Miller's Anesthesia , 2005 .

[4]  Wen-Chung Tsai,et al.  Ultrasound Guidance in Caudal Epidural Needle Placement , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[5]  M. Sekiguchi,et al.  An Anatomic Study of the Sacral Hiatus: A Basis for Successful Caudal Epidural Block , 2004, The Clinical Journal of Pain.

[6]  T. Jenkinson,et al.  Sonographically Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  N. Arden,et al.  Comparison of the caudal and lumbar approaches to the epidural space , 2000, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  R. Lieberman Re: Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection. , 2000, Spine.

[9]  H. M. Sommer,et al.  Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection. , 1999, Spine.

[10]  G. Hobbs,et al.  A study of the anatomy of the caudal space using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  G. Afshan,et al.  Total spinal anaesthesia following caudal block with bupivacaine and buprenorphine , 1996, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[12]  K. C. Spaccarelli,et al.  Lumbar and caudal epidural corticosteroid injections. , 1996, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  D. Renfrew,et al.  Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration. , 1991, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  Michael J. Cousins,et al.  Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain , 1988 .

[15]  R. Derby,et al.  Epidural Injections for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low-Back Pain , 1980, Spine.

[16]  A. Digiovanni Inadvertent intraosseous injection--a hazard of caudal anesthesia. , 1971, Anesthesiology.