The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere

This article provides an overview of the NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) mission and a summary of selected scientific findings to date. ATom was an airborne measurements and modeling campaign aimed at characterizing the composition and chemistry of the troposphere over the most remote regions of the Pacific, Southern, Atlantic, and Arctic Oceans, and examining the impact of anthropogenic and natural emissions on a global scale. These remote regions dominate global chemical reactivity and are exceptionally important for global air quality and climate. ATom data provide the in situ measurements needed to understand the range of chemical species and their reactions, and to test satellite remote sensing observations and global models over large regions of the remote atmosphere. Lack of data in these regions, particularly over the oceans, has limited our understanding of how atmospheric composition is changing in response to shifting anthropogenic emissions and physical climate change. ATom was designed as a global-scale tomographic sampling mission with extensive geographic and seasonal coverage, tropospheric vertical profiling, and detailed speciation of reactive compounds and pollution tracers. ATom flew the NASA DC-8 research aircraft over four seasons to collect a comprehensive suite of measurements of gases, aerosols, and radical species from the remote troposphere and lower stratosphere on four global circuits from 2016 to 2018. Flights maintained near-continuous vertical profiling of 0.15–13-km altitudes on long meridional transects of the Pacific and Atlantic Ocean basins. Analysis and modeling of ATom data have led to the significant early findings highlighted here.

[1]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[2]  J. Peischl,et al.  Supplementary material to "Impact of stratospheric air and surface emissions on tropospheric nitrous oxide during ATom" , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[3]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Supplementary material to "Heterogeneity and Chemical Reactivity of the Remote Troposphere defined by Aircraft Measurements" , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[4]  M. Chin,et al.  Chemical transport models often underestimate inorganic aerosol acidity in remote regions of the atmosphere , 2021, Communications Earth & Environment.

[5]  J. Crounse,et al.  Improvements to a laser-induced fluorescence instrument for measuring SO2 – impact on accuracy and precision , 2021 .

[6]  H. Matsui,et al.  Global-scale constraints on light-absorbing anthropogenic iron oxide aerosols , 2021, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.

[7]  J. Peischl,et al.  Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in-situ measurements , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[8]  D. Jacob,et al.  The Global Budget of Atmospheric Methanol: New Constraints on Secondary, Oceanic, and Terrestrial Sources , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[9]  E. Kort,et al.  UAS Chromatograph for Atmospheric Trace Species (UCATS) – a versatile instrument for trace gas measurements on airborne platforms , 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[10]  D. Jacob,et al.  Evaluation of single-footprint AIRS CH4 profile retrieval uncertainties using aircraft profile measurements , 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[11]  P. Rasch,et al.  New SOA Treatments Within the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM): Strong Production and Sinks Govern Atmospheric SOA Distributions and Radiative Forcing , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[12]  Antonia Gambacorta,et al.  Validation of Carbon Trace Gas Profile Retrievals from the NOAA-Unique Combined Atmospheric Processing System for the Cross-Track Infrared Sounder , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[13]  J. Peischl,et al.  Radiative and chemical implications of the size and composition of aerosol particles in the existing or modified global stratosphere , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[14]  J. Sheng,et al.  Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[15]  B. Stephens,et al.  Airborne measurements of oxygen concentration from the surface to the lower stratosphere and pole to pole , 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[16]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Atmospheric Budget of Acetone: Air‐Sea Exchange and the Contribution to Hydroxyl Radicals , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[17]  A. Bloom,et al.  Carbon Monitoring System Flux Net Biosphere Exchange 2020 (CMS-Flux NBE 2020) , 2020, Earth System Science Data.

[18]  F. Yu,et al.  Further improvement of wet process treatments in GEOS-Chem v12.6.0: impact on global distributions of aerosols and aerosol precursors , 2020 .

[19]  M. Chin,et al.  Widespread biomass burning smoke throughout the remote troposphere , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[20]  Yuhang Wang,et al.  Global Measurements of Brown Carbon and Estimated Direct Radiative Effects , 2020, Geophysical research letters.

[21]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Evidence for an Oceanic Source of Methyl Ethyl Ketone to the Atmosphere , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[22]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  K. Chance,et al.  Validation of satellite formaldehyde (HCHO) retrievals using observations from 12 aircraft campaigns , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[24]  B. Dix,et al.  Quantitative detection of iodine in the stratosphere , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  J. Peischl,et al.  Exploring Oxidation in the Remote Free Troposphere: Insights From Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[26]  J. Peischl,et al.  Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations , 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[27]  J. Peischl,et al.  Global-scale distribution of ozone in the remote troposphere from ATom and HIPPO airborne field missions , 2020 .

[28]  T. Borsdorff,et al.  1.5 years of TROPOMI CO measurements: Comparisons to MOPITT and ATom , 2020 .

[29]  J. Jimenez,et al.  A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single-particle mass spectrometry , 2019 .

[30]  F. Chevallier,et al.  Objective evaluation of surface- and satellite-driven carbon dioxide atmospheric inversions , 2019 .

[31]  J. Peischl,et al.  Missing OH reactivity in the global marine boundary layer , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[32]  E. Ray,et al.  A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics , 2019, Nature.

[33]  M. Chin,et al.  Supplementary material to "Characterization of Organic Aerosol across the Global Remote Troposphere: A comparison of ATom measurements and global chemistry models" , 2019 .

[34]  T. Hanisco,et al.  CAFE: a new, improved nonresonant laser-induced fluorescence instrument for airborne in situ measurement of formaldehyde , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[35]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Aerosol size distributions during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom): methods, uncertainties, and data products , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[36]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Atmospheric Acetaldehyde: Importance of Air‐Sea Exchange and a Missing Source in the Remote Troposphere , 2019, Geophysical research letters.

[37]  J. Peischl,et al.  Mapping hydroxyl variability throughout the global remote troposphere via synthesis of airborne and satellite formaldehyde observations , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  H. Worden,et al.  Radiance-based retrieval bias mitigation for the MOPITT instrument: the version 8 product , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[39]  David Crisp,et al.  The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[40]  S. Freitas,et al.  Efficient In‐Cloud Removal of Aerosols by Deep Convection , 2019, Geophysical research letters.

[41]  M. Chin,et al.  Observationally constrained analysis of sea salt aerosol in the marine atmosphere , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[42]  P. Stier,et al.  In-situ constraints on the vertical distribution of global aerosol , 2019 .

[43]  J. Jimenez,et al.  A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single particle mass spectrometry , 2019 .

[44]  B. Samset,et al.  Strong Contrast in Remote Black Carbon Aerosol Loadings Between the Atlantic and Pacific Basins , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[45]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Cloud impacts on photochemistry: building a climatology of photolysis rates from the Atmospheric Tomography mission , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[46]  G. Diskin,et al.  The distribution of sea-salt aerosol in the global troposphere , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[47]  K. Džepina,et al.  Molecular and physical characteristics of aerosol at a remote free troposphere site: implications for atmospheric aging , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[48]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Forecasting carbon monoxide on a global scale for the ATom-1 aircraft mission: insights from airborne and satellite observations and modeling , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[49]  Gilles Foret,et al.  Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone relevant to climate and global atmospheric chemistry model evaluation , 2018 .

[50]  J. Lamarque,et al.  How well can global chemistry models calculate the reactivity of short-lived greenhouse gases in the remote troposphere, knowing the chemical composition , 2018 .

[51]  J. Peischl,et al.  An aerosol particle containing enriched uranium encountered in the remote upper troposphere. , 2018, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[52]  Joseph P. Pinto,et al.  Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report : Present-day ozone distribution and trends relevant to human health , 2018 .

[53]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Atmospheric Chemistry – Which Air Matters , 2017 .

[54]  Bin Zhao,et al.  The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). , 2017, Journal of climate.

[55]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Limits on the ability of global Eulerian models to resolve intercontinental transport of chemical plumes , 2016 .

[56]  Anne M. Thompson,et al.  Tropospheric ozone change from 1980 to 2010 dominated by equatorward redistribution of emissions , 2016, Nature geoscience.

[57]  D. Jacob,et al.  Why do Models Overestimate Surface Ozone in the Southeastern United States? , 2016, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[58]  R. Wolke,et al.  An advanced modeling study on the impacts and atmospheric implications of multiphase dimethyl sulfide chemistry , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Min Shao,et al.  Towards a quantitative understanding of total OH reactivity: A review , 2016 .

[60]  S. Madronich,et al.  Rethinking the global secondary organic aerosol (SOA) budget: stronger production, faster removal, shorter lifetime , 2015 .

[61]  Runrun Wu,et al.  New mechanism for the atmospheric oxidation of dimethyl sulfide. The importance of intramolecular hydrogen shift in a CH₃SCH₂OO radical. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[62]  J. Peischl,et al.  The POLARCAT Model Intercomparison Project (POLMIP): Overview and Evaluation with Observations , 2014 .

[63]  Gabriele Curci,et al.  The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models , 2014, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[64]  R. Cohen,et al.  Measurements of CH 3 O 2 NO 2 in the upper troposphere , 2014 .

[65]  M. Holland,et al.  Near-term climate change:Projections and predictability , 2014 .

[66]  D. Fahey,et al.  Global-scale seasonally resolved black carbon vertical profiles over the Pacific , 2013, Geophysical research letters.

[67]  M. Chin,et al.  Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations , 2013 .

[68]  G. Meehl,et al.  Near-term climate change:projections and predictability , 2013 .

[69]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) , 2012 .

[70]  A. Lewis,et al.  Multiannual observations of acetone, methanol, and acetaldehyde in remote tropical atlantic air: implications for atmospheric OVOC budgets and oxidative capacity. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[71]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global air quality and climate. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[72]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Analysis of Present Day and Future OH and Methane Lifetime in the ACCMIP Simulations , 2012 .

[73]  J. Lamarque,et al.  The Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP): overview and description of models, simulations and climate diagnostics , 2012 .

[74]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) , 2012 .

[75]  Michael J. Prather,et al.  Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions , 2012 .

[76]  Michael J. Prather,et al.  Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: Systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry , 2012 .

[77]  Nicholas Z. Muller,et al.  Global Air Quality and Health Co-benefits of Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change through Methane and Black Carbon Emission Controls , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[78]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security , 2012, Science.

[79]  P. Quinn,et al.  The case against climate regulation via oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions , 2011, Nature.

[80]  Luke D. Oman,et al.  The response of tropical tropospheric ozone to ENSO , 2011 .

[81]  S. Wofsy,et al.  HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): fine-grained, global-scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases and aerosols , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[82]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone , 2011 .

[83]  A. Clarke,et al.  Hemispheric Aerosol Vertical Profiles: Anthropogenic Impacts on Optical Depth and Cloud Nuclei , 2010, Science.

[84]  David W. Fahey,et al.  The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[85]  William H. Brune,et al.  Chemistry and transport of pollution over the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific: spring 2006 INTEX-B campaign overview and first results , 2009 .

[86]  R. C. Owen,et al.  Nonmethane hydrocarbons at Pico Mountain, Azores: 1. Oxidation chemistry in the North Atlantic region , 2008 .

[87]  H. Fuelberg,et al.  Formaldehyde over North America and the North Atlantic during the summer 2004 INTEX campaign: Methods, observed distributions, and measurement-model comparisons , 2008 .

[88]  Denise L Mauzerall,et al.  Global health benefits of mitigating ozone pollution with methane emission controls. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  M. Deeter,et al.  Relationship between Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) and in situ observations of CO based on a large‐scale feature sampled during TRACE‐P , 2004 .

[90]  Paul B. Shepson,et al.  Missing OH Reactivity in a Forest: Evidence for Unknown Reactive Biogenic VOCs , 2004, Science.

[91]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  Asian Outflow and Trans-Pacific Transport of Carbon Monoxide and Ozone Pollution: An Integrated Satellite, Aircraft, and Model Perspective , 2003 .

[92]  A. Clarke,et al.  A Pacific Aerosol Survey. Part I: A Decade of Data on Particle Production, Transport, Evolution, and Mixing in the Troposphere* , 2002 .

[93]  J. Hansen,et al.  Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[94]  D. Schimel,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases , 1999 .

[95]  P. Monks,et al.  Fundamental ozone photochemistry in the remote marine boundary layer: the soapex experiment, measurement and theory , 1998 .

[96]  J. Fishman,et al.  NASA GTE TRACE A experiment (September–October 1992): Overview , 1996 .

[97]  B. Forgan,et al.  The annual cycle of peroxides and ozone in marine air at Cape Grim, Tasmania , 1996 .

[98]  A. Clarke Atmospheric nuclei in the Pacific midtroposphere: Their nature, concentration, and evolution , 1993 .

[99]  Barry J. Huebert,et al.  A study of the photochemistry and ozone budget during the Mauna Loa Observatory Photochemistry Experiment , 1992 .

[100]  A. Guenther,et al.  Sulfur emissions to the atmosphere from natural sourees , 1992 .

[101]  J. Fishman,et al.  Identification of Widespread Pollution in the Southern Hemisphere Deduced from Satellite Analyses , 1991, Science.

[102]  J. Fishman,et al.  The significance of biomass burning as a source of carbon monoxide and ozone in the southern hemisphere tropics: A satellite analysis , 1990 .

[103]  Jack Fishman,et al.  Distribution of tropospheric ozone determined from satellite data , 1990 .

[104]  S. Warren,et al.  Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate , 1987, Nature.

[105]  P. D. Houmere,et al.  Dimethyl sulfide in the marine atmosphere , 1985 .