A Motion Illusion from Two-Dimensional Periodic Patterns

The spatial properties of a motion illusion (the Ouchi illusion) that occurs in a stationary pattern were examined by means of a variety of two-dimensional periodic patterns (formed by multiplying pairs of various one-dimensional periodic functions). In two experiments, observers rated the magnitude of the illusion. The results showed that (1) patterns having large energy and steep saddle-shaped contrast gradients tended to generate stronger illusions, (2) the composite pattern made up of the sum of the fundamental and harmonic components exhibited a stronger illusion than either the fundamental or the harmonic pattern, (3) patterns possessing an element orientation and phase shift similar to those of a rectangular checkerboard, and with element sizes of 15–50 min in width and 4–8 min in height yielded a larger illusion, (4) equiluminant colors largely abolished the effect, and (5) blurring the boundary between the test and surround did not reduce the illusion. Interactions between spatially overlapping ON and OFF units was discussed as a possible underlying cause of this phenomenon.

[1]  E. Holst Relations between the central Nervous System and the peripheral organs , 1954 .

[2]  D. Mackay Moving Visual Images produced by Regular Stationary Patterns , 1958, Nature.

[3]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  R. Steinman,et al.  Voluntary Control of Microsaccades during Maintained Monocular Fixation , 1967, Science.

[5]  D. Fender,et al.  The interplay of drifts and flicks in binocular fixation. , 1969, Vision research.

[6]  D. H. Kelly Pattern detection and the two-dimensional Fourier transform: Flickering checkerboards and chromatic mechanisms , 1976, Vision Research.

[7]  D. H. Kelly Spatiotemporal variation of chromatic and achromatic contrast thresholds. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Perception of Motion in Equiluminous Kinematograms , 1985, Perception.

[9]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[10]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Functions of the ON and OFF channels of the visual system , 1986, Nature.

[11]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  C. Koch,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: from computational theory to neuronal mechanisms. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Vision at equiluminance , 1991 .

[15]  A. B. Bonds Temporal dynamics of contrast gain in single cells of the cat striate cortex , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[16]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[17]  O. Mimura [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[18]  Peter H. Schiller,et al.  The ON and OFF channels of the visual system , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  A comment: Mackay Rays shimmer due to accommodation changes , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  H. Wilson,et al.  A two-process analysis of pattern masking , 1994, Vision Research.

[22]  Under the Carpet , 1994, Perception.

[23]  Trevor J. Hine,et al.  An illusion of relative motion dependent upon spatial frequency and orientation , 1995, Vision Research.