Different stabilisation techniques for typical acetabular fractures in the elderly--a biomechanical assessment.

OBJECTIVES The tremendous increase of acetabular fractures in the elderly provides new challenges for their surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of conventional and newly developed implants for the stabilisation of an anterior column combined with posterior hemitransverse fracture (ACPHTF), which represents the typical acetabular fracture in the elderly. METHODS Using a single-leg stance model we analysed four different implant systems for the stabilisation of ACPHTFs in synthetic and cadaveric pelvises. Applying an increasing axial load, fracture dislocation was analysed with a new multidirectional ultrasonic measuring system. Results of the different implant systems were compared by Scheffé post hoc test and one-way ANOVA. RESULTS In synthetic pelvises, the standard reconstruction plate fixed by 3 periarticular long screws and a new titanium fixator with multidirectional interlocking screws were associated with significantly less dislocation of the fractured quadrilateral plate of the acetabulum when compared to a standard reconstruction plate fixed by only one periarticular long screw and a locking reconstruction plate. No significant differences between the different osteosynthesis techniques could be observed in cadaver pelvises, probably due to a heterogeneous bone quality. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that the plate fixation by positioning of periarticular long screws as well as the multidirectional positioning of interlocking screws account for the most sufficient fracture stabilisation of ACPHTFs under experimental conditions.

[1]  K. Seide,et al.  Wirkprinzipien der winkelstabilen Platten-Schrauben-Verbindung bei Fixateur-interne-Osteosynthesen , 1999, Trauma und Berufskrankheit.

[2]  K. Weise,et al.  [Conservative therapy of acetabular fractures--indications and results]. , 1987, Aktuelle Traumatologie.

[3]  E. Letournel.  The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  E. Letournel.  [Surgical treatment of fractures of the acetabulum: results over a twenty-five year period (author's transl)]. , 1981, Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie.

[5]  J. M. Matta,et al.  Fracture of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury , 2011 .

[6]  D. Kahler,et al.  Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[7]  V. Vécsei,et al.  Acetabular fractures: operative management and long term results. , 1999, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[8]  Emile Letournel,et al.  Fractures of the Acetabulum , 1981, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[9]  R. Haug,et al.  A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques. Discussion , 2002 .

[10]  C. Krettek,et al.  [Biomechanical comparison of various emergency stabilization measures of the pelvic ring]. , 1994, Der Unfallchirurg.

[11]  T D Brown,et al.  Stability of acetabular fractures after internal fixation. A cadaveric study. , 1984, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  G. Watson,et al.  Computer simulation , 1988 .

[13]  N. Shazar,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of transverse acetabular fracture fixation. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  R. Haug,et al.  A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[15]  H. Tscherne,et al.  [Comparative biomechanical studies of internal stabilization of trans-foraminal sacrum fractures]. , 1992, Der Orthopade.

[16]  Goris Rj,et al.  Conservative treatment of fractures of the acetabulum. Results after longtime follow-up. , 1988 .

[17]  J. Matta.  Fractures of the Acetabulum: Accuracy of Reduction and Clinical Results in Patients Managed Operatively within Three Weeks after the Injury* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  P. Rommens,et al.  Acetabulumfrakturen im Alter , 2002, Der Unfallchirurg.

[19]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Biomechanical consequences of anterior column fracture of the acetabulum. , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[20]  Kelly J. Hendricks,et al.  The “Gull Sign”: A Harbinger of Failure for Internal Fixation of Geriatric Acetabular Fractures , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[21]  G. Fenzl,et al.  Azetabulumfrakturen-operative versus konservative Behandlung , 1990, Unfallchirurgie.

[22]  T. Hüfner,et al.  Dreidimensionale Bewegungsanalyse nach interner Stabilisierung von Beckenringfrakturen Eine Computersimulation , 2000, Der Unfallchirurg.

[23]  J. Palot,et al.  The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. , 1984, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[24]  Erik N. Kubiak,et al.  Biomechanics of Locked Plates and Screws , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[25]  R. Haug,et al.  A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[26]  P. Leyvraz,et al.  Cable fixation and early total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of acetabular fractures in elderly patients. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  F. Baumgaertel.  [Diagnosis, classification and surgical indications in acetabulum fractures]. , 1992, Der Orthopade.