“It all happened so slowly” – On controlling function creep in forensic DNA databases

Forensic DNA databases are implemented worldwide and used increasingly. Part of this increasing usage is arguably a matter of function creep. Function creep refers to changes in, and especially additions to, the use of a technology. In this article we explore the notion of function creep as we discuss why and how it has taken place on forensic DNA databases. We also consider what future function creep it is possible to envisage. As even security enhancing technologies may contribute to insecurities, what safeguards should be in place to render function creep governable? We use the Norwegian DNA database, expanded considerably as recently as September 2008, as our primary case for discussion. Additionally we use examples from the English and Welsh DNA database which, considered world leading, may be an indication of where other DNA databases are heading. The article isn't data-driven but draws on a wide spectrum of data: governmental documents, public and Parliamentary debates, and interviews.

[1]  Tim Clayton,et al.  DNA and the Criminal Justice System , 2005 .

[2]  Richard G Fox,et al.  Someone to Watch Over Us: , 2001 .

[3]  Jesse F. Dillard,et al.  Ethical Development of Advanced Technology: A Postmodern Stakeholder Perspective , 1999 .

[4]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[5]  C. McCartney Forensic identification and criminal justice: Forensic science, justice and risk , 2006 .

[6]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[7]  C. Bullard Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[8]  I. Oliver Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary , 1997 .

[9]  Arbeids og administrasjonsdepartementet Instructions for official studies and reports , 2000 .

[10]  L. Ring,et al.  Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? , 2006, European journal of public health.

[11]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[12]  R. Merton Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[13]  Robin Williams,et al.  Circuits of Surveillance. , 2002, Surveillance & society.

[14]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies , 2003 .

[15]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  Book-Review - the Golem - what Everyone Should Know about Science , 1993 .

[16]  Paul Johnson,et al.  Genetic policing : the use of DNA in criminal investigations , 2008 .

[17]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users and non-users matter , 2003 .

[18]  Roy Coleman The new politics of surveillance and visibility. , 2007 .

[19]  Paul Johnson,et al.  European securitization and biometric identification: the uses of genetic profiling. , 2007, Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita.

[20]  Melvin Kranzberg Technology and History: "Kranzberg's Laws" , 1986 .

[21]  Robin Williams,et al.  ‘Wonderment and dread’: representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases , 2004, New genetics and society.

[22]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  Seeing Hazily (But Not Darkly) Through the Lens: Some Recent Empirical Studies of Surveillance Technologies , 2005, Law & Social Inquiry.