Optimization and dynamics of protein–protein complexes using B‐splines

A moving‐grid approach for optimization and dynamics of protein–protein complexes is introduced, which utilizes cubic B‐spline interpolation for rapid energy and force evaluation. The method allows for the efficient use of full electrostatic potentials joined smoothly to multipoles at long distance so that multiprotein simulation is possible. Using a recently published benchmark of 58 protein complexes, we examine the performance and quality of the grid approximation, refining cocrystallized complexes to within 0.68 Å RMSD of interface atoms, close to the optimum 0.63 Å produced by the underlying MMFF94 force field. We quantify the theoretical statistical advantage of using minimization in a stochastic search in the case of two rigid bodies, and contrast it with the underlying cost of conjugate gradient minimization using B‐splines. The volumes of conjugate gradient minimization basins of attraction in cocrystallized systems are generally orders of magnitude larger than well volumes based on energy thresholds needed to discriminate native from nonnative states; nonetheless, computational cost is significant. Molecular dynamics using B‐splines is doubly efficient due to the combined advantages of rapid force evaluation and large simulation step sizes. Large basins localized around the native state and other possible binding sites are identifiable during simulations of protein–protein motion. In addition to providing increased modeling detail, B‐splines offer new algorithmic possibilities that should be valuable in refining docking candidates and studying global complex behavior. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 25: 1630–1646, 2004

[1]  E. Hamori,et al.  Calculated minimum energy. Conformations of nonactin , 1974, Biopolymers.

[2]  C. Brooks,et al.  Virtual rigid body dynamics , 1991, Biopolymers.

[3]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .

[4]  David Fincham,et al.  Leapfrog Rotational Algorithms , 1992 .

[5]  Daniel A. Gschwend,et al.  Orientational sampling and rigid‐body minimization in molecular docking , 1993, Proteins.

[6]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF THE AMBER94, MMFF94, AND OPLS-AA FORCE FIELDS FOR MODELING ORGANIC LIQUIDS , 1996 .

[7]  Thomas A. Halgren,et al.  Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  T. Halgren Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions , 1996 .

[9]  W Smith,et al.  DL_POLY_2.0: a general-purpose parallel molecular dynamics simulation package. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[10]  T. Halgren Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Accurate ab Initio Quantum Chemical Determination of the Relative Energetics of Peptide Conformations and Assessment of Empirical Force Fields , 1997 .

[12]  B. Leimkuhler,et al.  Symplectic splitting methods for rigid body molecular dynamics , 1997 .

[13]  H A Scheraga,et al.  Reaching the global minimum in docking simulations: a Monte Carlo energy minimization approach using Bezier splines. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .

[15]  Shen-Shu Sung,et al.  Constraint dynamics algorithm for simulation of semiflexible macromolecules , 1998 .

[16]  Jonathan D. Hirst,et al.  Assessing search strategies for flexible docking , 1998 .

[17]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  B‐spline method for energy minimization in grid‐based molecular mechanics calculations , 1998 .

[18]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Prodock: Software package for protein modeling and docking , 1999 .

[19]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Flexible docking simulations: Scaled collective variable Monte Carlo minimization approach using Bezier splines, and comparison with a standard Monte Carlo algorithm , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  M. Sternberg,et al.  An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[21]  Carlos E. Padilla,et al.  MBO(N)D: A multibody method for long‐time molecular dynamics simulations , 2000 .

[22]  Timothy R. Forester,et al.  SHAKE, rattle, and roll: Efficient constraint algorithms for linked rigid bodies , 2000 .

[23]  K M Merz,et al.  GB/SA water model for the Merck molecular force field (MMFF). , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[24]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  Small Molecule Docking and Scoring , 2001 .

[25]  H A Scheraga,et al.  Structure of the interferon-receptor complex determined by distance constraints from double-mutant cycles and flexible docking , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  M. Sanner,et al.  Model of the αLβ2 integrin I‐domain/ICAM‐1 DI interface suggests that subtle changes in loop orientation determine ligand specificity , 2002 .

[27]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics , 2002, Proteins.

[28]  Anthony K. Felts,et al.  Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all‐atom force field and the surface generalized born solvent model , 2002, Proteins.

[29]  Thomas F. Miller,et al.  Symplectic quaternion scheme for biophysical molecular dynamics , 2002 .

[30]  G Marius Clore,et al.  Using conjoined rigid body/torsion angle simulated annealing to determine the relative orientation of covalently linked protein domains from dipolar couplings. , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[31]  R. Abagyan,et al.  ICM‐DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side‐chains , 2003, Proteins.

[32]  Li Li,et al.  RDOCK: Refinement of rigid‐body protein docking predictions , 2003, Proteins.

[33]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm , 2003, Proteins.

[34]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Detailed analysis of grid‐based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER—A CHARMm‐based MD docking algorithm , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[35]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.