The study reported below investigated the influence of two different navigation tasks on the design of map displays: 1) route following and alternate route generation in an unfamiliar town. The study examined four different maps: 1) north-up, 2) north-up-wedge, 3) track-up and 4) heading separated. The heading separated map was either north-up or south-up depending upon the orientation most compatible with a driver's current heading. This was intended to provide the advantages of a track-up map while reducing the frequency with which the map orientation changed. An analysis of task-map coherence predicted the compatibility of the route following task with either the track-up map or the heading separated map. The analysis also predicted the compatibility of the alternate route generation task with the heading separated map relative to the track-up map. These predictions were tested using a simulation hosted on an engineering workstation. Convergent measures support the predicted advantages of the heading-separated map.
[1]
William A. Perez,et al.
Human Factors and Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS)
,
1992
.
[2]
Anthony J. Aretz.
The Design of Electronic Map Displays
,
1991
.
[3]
P A Hancock,et al.
Intelligent vehicle highway systems: problems and promises: part 1
,
1992
.
[4]
Thomas A. Dingus,et al.
Human Factors in the Travtek Demonstration IVHS Project: Getting Information to the Driver
,
1991
.
[5]
Anthony J. Aretz.
A Model of Electronic Map Interpretation
,
1988
.
[6]
Anthony J. Aretz.
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
,
1989
.
[7]
Girish Prabhu,et al.
IN-VEHICLE NAVIGATION DISPLAYS : A HUMAN ATTENTION AND INFORMATION PROCESSING MODEL
,
1995
.