A multiple-case study investigation of the discontinuation of nine chat reference services

Using the multiple-case study method, this research investigates reasons why nine virtual reference (chat) services have been discontinued. The investigation of these five academic, one public, and three consortial chat services was conducted through structured e-mail and telephone interviews with the library decision makers and analysis of available reports and documents. The major reason for discontinuation was funding problems, followed by low volume (including low volume by target audience). Other reasons were staffing problems, technical problems, and institutional culture issues. Staffing issues included the need for comfortable staffing patterns, maintenance of sufficient volume to maintain proficiency, and cultivation of positive attitudes. Technical problems centered on software malfunctions and connectivity difficulties. Within two of the consortia, different patterns of funding, staffing, and mission posed difficulties for blended cultures that caused the consortia to break up. Despite all these issues, the possibility of restarting chat services, perhaps in consortia or with simpler chat software, exists for all services, with two services desiring to restart when funds and reorganization permit.

[1]  M. Kathleen Kern.  Have(n't) We Been Here Before? Lessons from Telephone Reference , 2004 .

[2]  Jonas Holmström.  The Return on Investment of Electronic Journals - It Is a Matter of Time , 2004, D Lib Mag..

[3]  R. David Lankes,et al.  The current state of digital reference: validation of a general digital reference model through a survey of digital reference services , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Peter Bromberg.  Managing a statewide virtual reference service: how Q and A NJ works , 2003 .

[5]  George Cigale.  Partners in Advocacy. , 2005 .

[6]  Neil A. Radford.  Failure in the Library: A Case Study , 1983, The Library Quarterly.

[7]  Scott Matheson,et al.  Library LAWLINE: Collaborative Virtual Reference in a Special Library Consortium , 2004 .

[8]  Bruce Stoffel,et al.  E‐mail and chat reference: assessing patron satisfaction , 2004 .

[9]  Henry M. Levin,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1987 .

[10]  Yin Zhang,et al.  An evaluative case study of a real-time online reference service , 2003, Electron. Libr..

[11]  Marilyn Domas White,et al.  Evaluation of Chat Reference Service Quality: Pilot Study , 2003, D Lib Mag..

[12]  Tina E. Chrzastowski.  Journal collection cost-effectiveness in an academic Chemistry Library: results of a cost/use survey at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 1991 .

[13]  Stuart Spencer,et al.  ASK: a virtual enquiry desk - a case study , 2003, Electron. Libr..

[14]  David Henry Ward,et al.  Measuring the completeness of reference transactions in online chats: Results of an unobtrusive study , 2004 .

[15]  Kirsti Nilsen,et al.  The Library Visit Study: user experiences at the virtual reference desk , 2003, Inf. Res..

[16]  Sandra L. De Groote,et al.  Quantifying Cooperation: Collaborative Digital Reference Service in the Large Academic Library , 2005 .

[17]  Julie Neal K Arnold,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of a Chat Service , 2005 .

[18]  Wilbur Schramm,et al.  Notes on Case Studies of Instructional Media Projects. , 1971 .

[19]  Carol Tenopir.  E-Resources in Tough Times. , 2004 .

[20]  Araby Greene,et al.  A university‐wide, library‐based chat service , 2004 .

[21]  Carol Tenopir.  Rethinking Virtual Reference. , 2004 .

[22]  R. David Lankes,et al.  Cost, Statistics, Measures, and Standards for Digital Reference Services: A Preliminary View , 2003, Libr. Trends.

[23]  J. Hamel,et al.  Case Study Methods , 1993 .

[24]  Anne Grodzins Lipow.  The Virtual Reference Librarian's Handbook , 2003 .

[25]  Steve Coffman,et al.  To chat or not to chat: Taking yet another look at virtual reference , 2004 .

[26]  Lisa R Patricia A Deborah L Horowitz,et al.  The Viability of Live Online Reference: An Assessment , 2005 .

[28]  Marianne Foley,et al.  Instant Messaging Reference in an Academic Library: A Case Study , 2002 .

[29]  Joseph Janes.  Introduction to Reference Work in the Digital Age , 2003 .

[30]  Eileen G. Abels.  Improving Reference Service Cost Studies. , 1997 .

[31]  Nancy R. John,et al.  10 Myths about PDAs - Debunked , 2003 .

[32]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[33]  Jeffrey Pomerantz,et al.  A conceptual framework and open research questions for chat-based reference service , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Carol Tenopir.  Chat''''s Positive Side , 2004 .

[35]  Frank R. Allen,et al.  Using the Contingent Valuation Method to Measure Patron Benefits of Reference Desk Service in an Academic Library , 1999 .

[36]  Barbara Pease,et al.  Digital Reference: A Case Study of Question Types in an Academic Library , 2001 .

[37]  Marjorie E. Murfin,et al.  Quality reference service: A preliminary case study , 1996 .

[38]  R. David Lankes.  The Virtual Reference Desk: Creating a Reference Future , 2006 .

[39]  Dorothy Milne,et al.  A Survey of the Cost-Effectiveness of Serials: , 1991 .

[40]  Marie L. Radford,et al.  Encountering virtual users: A qualitative investigation of interpersonal communication in chat reference , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..