Researcher Perspectives on Data Sharing in Deep Brain Stimulation

The expansion of research on deep brain stimulation (DBS) and adaptive DBS (aDBS) raises important neuroethics and policy questions related to data sharing. However, there has been little empirical research on the perspectives of experts developing these technologies. We conducted semi-structured, open-ended interviews with aDBS researchers regarding their data sharing practices and their perspectives on ethical and policy issues related to sharing. Researchers expressed support for and a commitment to sharing, with most saying that they were either sharing their data or would share in the future and that doing so was important for advancing the field. However, those who are sharing reported a variety of sharing partners, suggesting heterogeneity in sharing practices and lack of the broad sharing that would reflect principles of open science. Researchers described several concerns and barriers related to sharing, including privacy and confidentiality, the usability of shared data by others, ownership and control of data (including potential commercialization), and limited resources for sharing. They also suggested potential solutions to these challenges, including additional safeguards to address privacy issues, standardization and transparency in analysis to address issues of data usability, professional norms and heightened cooperation to address issues of ownership and control, and streamlining of data transmission to address resource limitations. Researchers also offered a range of views on the sensitivity of neural activity data (NAD) and data related to mental health in the context of sharing. These findings are an important input to deliberations by researchers, policymakers, neuroethicists, and other stakeholders as they navigate ethics and policy questions related to aDBS research.

[1]  Eric A. Storch,et al.  The Case for Adaptive Neuromodulation to Treat Severe Intractable Mental Disorders , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[2]  A. McGuire,et al.  Researcher Perspectives on Ethical Considerations in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Trials , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Alpert,et al.  Brain Privacy: How Can We Protect It? , 2007, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[4]  Nancy S. Jecker,et al.  The Sources of Normativity , 2001 .

[5]  Eran Klein,et al.  Brain–computer interface (BCI) researcher perspectives on neural data ownership and privacy , 2019, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  John A. Lynch,et al.  Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism , 2019, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[7]  J. Illes,et al.  Situating brain regions among patent rights and moral risks , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons , 2007 .

[9]  Laszlo A. Jeni,et al.  Spontaneous facial expression in unscripted social interactions can be measured automatically , 2015, Behavior research methods.

[10]  Jeff McMahan,et al.  The ethics of killing : problems at the margins of life , 2002 .

[11]  R. Cook-Deegan,et al.  The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project , 2018, Journal of the History of Biology.

[12]  Udo Kuckartz,et al.  Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software , 2013 .

[13]  Ari Schick Neuro Exceptionalism? , 2005, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[14]  M. Rothstein,et al.  Genetic Exceptionalism & Legislative Pragmatism , 2005, The Hastings Center report.

[15]  Lainie Friedman Ross,et al.  Genetic Exceptionalism vs. Paradigm Shift: Lessons from HIV , 2001, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[16]  Alan Rubel,et al.  Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI , 2017, Nature.

[17]  M. April Rethinking HIV exceptionalism: the ethics of opt-out HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[18]  R. Bayer Public health policy and the AIDS epidemic. An end to HIV exceptionalism? , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  H. Babcock,et al.  Association of a , 1955 .

[20]  David B. Keator,et al.  SchizConnect: Virtual Data Integration in Neuroimaging , 2015, DILS.

[21]  F. Arnaud,et al.  From core referencing to data re-use: two French national initiatives to reinforce paleodata stewardship (National Cyber Core Repository and LTER France Retro-Observatory) , 2017 .

[22]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[23]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Data sharing in neuroimaging research , 2012, Front. Neuroinform..

[24]  W. Haselager,et al.  Stimulating the Self: The Influence of Conceptual Frameworks on Reactions to Deep Brain Stimulation , 2014 .

[25]  Judy Illes,et al.  Imaging or Imagining? A Neuroethics Challenge Informed by Genetics , 2005, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[26]  Bartha M Knoppers,et al.  Sharing health-related data: a privacy test? , 2016, npj Genomic Medicine.

[27]  Stacey A. Tovino Functional Neuroimaging Information: A Case for Neuro Exceptionalism? , 2006 .

[28]  Gerome Breen,et al.  Psychiatric Genomics: An Update and an Agenda , 2017, bioRxiv.

[29]  E. Racine,et al.  Neuroessentialism in Discussions About the Impact of Closed-Loop Technologies on Agency and Identity , 2017, AJOB neuroscience.

[30]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Possibility of Cooperation@@@Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability.@@@Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior.@@@Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. , 1990 .

[31]  E. Storch,et al.  Neuroethics at 15: Keep the Kant but Add More Bacon , 2019, AJOB neuroscience.

[32]  J. Mcmahan The Ethics of Killing , 2002 .

[33]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[34]  John Wilbanks,et al.  Creating a data resource: what will it take to build a medical information commons? , 2017, Genome Medicine.

[35]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[36]  N. Hawkins,et al.  Data sharing in genomics — re-shaping scientific practice , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[37]  L. J. Regan PRACTICAL ETHICS. , 1943, California and western medicine.

[38]  P. Kellmeyer Big Brain Data: On the Responsible Use of Brain Data from Clinical and Consumer-Directed Neurotechnological Devices , 2018 .

[39]  F. Cerra,et al.  Team science as interprofessional collaborative research practice: a systematic review of the science of team science literature , 2016, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[40]  C. Grady,et al.  Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices: A Review. , 2019, JAMA neurology.

[41]  Anna Wexler,et al.  Brain modulation and patent law , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  J. Sim,et al.  Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization , 2017, Quality & Quantity.

[43]  Laura Rothfritz,et al.  FAIR Data Principles , 2019, The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication.

[44]  Timothy Denison,et al.  Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: A Review of Emerging Issues and Technologies , 2016, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[45]  R. Wachbroit The Prospects for Neuro-Exceptionalism: Transparent Lies, Naked Minds , 2008, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[46]  Melissa A. Basford,et al.  Ethical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: the eMERGE Consortium experience. , 2011, Genome research.

[47]  Nader Pouratian,et al.  Proceedings of the Third Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: A Review of Emerging Issues and Technologies , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[48]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[49]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  iEEG-BIDS, extending the Brain Imaging Data Structure specification to human intracranial electrophysiology , 2019, Scientific Data.

[50]  K. M. O'Hara HIV exceptionalism and ethical concerns surrounding HIV testing , 2011, JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants.

[51]  S. McLennan,et al.  Regulating the Secondary Use of Data for Research: Arguments Against Genetic Exceptionalism , 2019, Front. Genet..

[52]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[53]  Charles Oppenheim Understanding Knowledge as Commons: From Theory to Practice , 2008 .

[54]  Jorge L. Contreras,et al.  Bermuda's Legacy: Policy, Patents and the Design of the Genome Commons , 2010 .

[55]  H. Bergman,et al.  Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions , 2019, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[57]  P. Reiner,et al.  Shifting One's Worldview to Neurocentrism May Be Troubling, But the Evidence That This Is the Cause of Maladaptation in DBS Patients Is Lacking , 2014 .

[58]  Gorm Rye Olsen,et al.  In the Bermuda Triangle Africa between China, the European Union and the United States , 2010 .