Physical blends and laminar composites of polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE) were prepared with and without a tri-block copolymer compatibilizer (poly(styrene-block-(ethylene-co-1-butene)-block-styrene)), denoted SEBS. Dielectric strength and breakdown time of samples exposed to external partial discharges (PD) were measured and relationships were sought with composition, phase morphology, and phase bonding. The polymers were selected because they are incompatible and because the dielectric strength and stability towards PD are greater for PS than for PE. It was shown by adding small quantities of SEBS that a minimum amount of cohesive forces between the components was required to achieve good electrical properties. The major morphological factor controlling the electrical stability was which polymer constituted the continuous phase. Laminar composites with continuous sheets of stable PS as a top layer exhibited a stability equal to or better than that predicted from the upper bound rule of mixing.
[1]
U. Gedde,et al.
Electrical degradation of binary polyethylene blends
,
1991
.
[2]
M. Welander,et al.
Use of an emulsifying block copolymer to improve time-dependent mechanical properties of polyethylene-polystyrene blends
,
1989
.
[3]
R. Basheer,et al.
Effects of copolymer composition on the formation of ionic species, hydrogen evolution, and free‐radical reaction in γ‐irradiated styrene‐butadiene random and block copolymers
,
1984
.
[4]
A. Hossam-eldin.
Analysis of discharge damage and breakdown in gaseous cavities in insulating materials
,
1984
.
[5]
D. Beckett,et al.
Routine crystallinity measurements of polymers by d.s.c.
,
1981
.