Proliferation-resistant fuel options for thermal and fast reactors avoiding neptunium production

Abstract Sustainable nuclear energy production requires reuse of spent nuclear fuel while avoiding its misuse. In the paper we assume that plutonium with sufficiently high content of the Pu-238 isotope (about 6% or more) and americium from spent nuclear fuel are proliferation-resistant. On the other hand, neptunium should be considered as material that is fissionable in a fast neutron spectrum and could be misused. We also assume that plutonium denatured by Pu-238 can be produced in nuclear reactors of, e.g. nuclear weapon states and used for fuel fabrication there or in multilateral reprocessing and re-fabrication centers as suggested by IAEA. Then the fabricated fuel can be utilized in nuclear reactors everywhere provided that the reactors may operate safely and the fuel remains proliferation-resistant after utilization. Options to meet these criteria are investigated in the paper for two reactor types: pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and fast reactors (FRs). In PWRs, the investigated fresh fuel compositions include denatured plutonium and depleted uranium mixed with a small amount of U-233, thorium and, optionally, with americium, presence of U-233 making the coolant void effect negative. In FRs, use of americium makes plutonium denatured, both for the burner (without fertile blanket) and breeder options. It is shown that the proposed design and fuel options are proliferation-resistant, the generation of neptunium being very low. Safety parameters are acceptable. Advanced aqueous or pyrochemical reprocessing for plutonium/thorium/uranium fuel and related fuel re-fabrication technology applying remote handling may become necessary to realize the considered fuel cycles.

[1]  A. Zaetta,et al.  Long-lived waste transmutation in reactors , 1995 .

[2]  G. Kessler,et al.  Fuel Cycle Options for the Production and Utilization of Denatured Plutonium , 2007 .

[3]  G. Kessler,et al.  Plutonium Denaturing by 238Pu , 2007 .

[4]  L Goyand,et al.  The potential use of 241 Am as proliferation resistant burnable poison , 2008 .

[5]  Andrei Rineiski Decay heat production in a TRU burner , 2008 .

[6]  G. Kessler,et al.  Requirements for nuclear energy in the 21st century nuclear energy as a sustainable energy source , 2002 .

[7]  M. Ishikawa,et al.  BN-600 full MOX core benchmark analysis. , 2004 .

[8]  J. L. Kloosterman,et al.  Definition of Breeding Gain for the Closed Fuel Cycle and Application to a Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor , 2007 .

[9]  C. Broeders,et al.  A new scientific solution for preventing the misuse of reactor-grade plutonium as nuclear explosive , 2008 .

[10]  Patrick Barbrault A plutonium-fueled high-moderated pressurized water reactor for the next century , 1996 .

[11]  R. S. Baker,et al.  DANTSYS: A diffusion accelerated neutral particle transport code system , 1995 .

[12]  C. Broeders,et al.  Investigations related to the buildup of transurania in pressurized water reactors , 1996 .

[13]  Werner Maschek,et al.  KINETICS AND CROSS-SECTION DEVELOPMENTS FOR ANALYSES OF REACTOR TRANSMUTATION CONCEPTS WITH SIMMER , 2005 .

[14]  G. Kessler,et al.  Proliferation Resistance of Americium Originating from Spent Irradiated Reactor Fuel of Pressurized Water Reactors, Fast Reactors, and Accelerator-Driven Systems with Different Fuel Cycle Options , 2008 .

[15]  Jan Leen Kloosterman,et al.  Plutonium Recycling in Pressurized Water Reactors: Influence of the Moderator-to-Fuel Ratio , 2000 .

[16]  M. Driscoll,et al.  The Linear Reactivity Model for Nuclear Fuel Management , 1991 .

[17]  J. F. Briesmeister MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .