Strategic Fit and the Societal Effect: Interpreting Cross-National Comparisons of Technology, Organization and Human Resources

The neo-contingency framework, responding to criticism against previous contingency thinking, appears to be potentially capable of serving as a basis for interpreting research in the tradition of the societal effect approach. This hypothesis is further developed using existing literature. The hypothesis is then examined by looking at the results of various cross-national comparisons of the organizational, human resources and strategic contexts of technical change in manufacturing. This leads to a reflection on the underlying factors influencing competitive advantage in national sectors or industries, and to a proposal on how distinct and different theoretical approaches can be conceived to be related to one another.

[1]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[2]  Karin Wagner,et al.  Productivity and Vocational Skills in Services in Britain and Germany: Hotels , 1989, National Institute Economic Review.

[3]  Ingolf Bambenger.  Developing competitive advantage in small and medium-size firms , 1989 .

[4]  Robert Cooper,et al.  Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 3: The Contribution of Jacques Derrida , 1989 .

[5]  H. Steedman,et al.  Productivity, Machinery and Skills: Clothing Manufacture in Britain and Germany , 1989, National Institute Economic Review.

[6]  Arndt Sorge,et al.  Microelectronic Product Applications in Great Britain and West Germany: Strategies Competence and Training , 1989 .

[7]  Huck Finn Revisited: A 19th Century Look at 20th Century Organization Theory , 1989 .

[8]  A. Sorge.  An Essay on Technical Change: Its Dimensions and Social and Strategic Context , 1989 .

[9]  Christel Lane,et al.  Management and Labour in Europe: The Industrial Enterprise in Germany, Britain and France , 1989 .

[10]  Vdi,et al.  Mikroelektronik, Qualifikation und Produktinnovation : Ergebnisse von Fallstudien , 1988 .

[11]  Karin Wagner,et al.  A Second Look At Productivity, Machinery and Skills in Britain and Germany , 1987, National Institute Economic Review.

[12]  Peter A. Clark,et al.  Anglo-American innovation , 1987 .

[13]  Michael J. Rose.  Universalism, culturalism and the Aix group: promise and problems of a societal approach to economic institutions , 1985 .

[14]  A. Sorge.  Informationstechnik und Arbeit im sozialen Prozeß : Arbeitsorganisation, Qualifikation und Produktivkraftentwicklung , 1985 .

[15]  E. Trist.  The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program , 1981 .

[16]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Contingency and Choice in Organization Theory , 1980 .

[17]  Anne Daly,et al.  The Machine Tool Industry in Britain, Germany and the United States: , 1980 .

[18]  Arndt Sorge,et al.  Societal Differences in Organizing Manufacturing Units: A Comparison of France, West Germany, and Great Britain , 1980 .

[19]  Howard E. Aldrich.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[20]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[21]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[22]  D. Silverman.  The Applicability of Organizational Sociology , 1973 .

[23]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[24]  D. Hickson.  Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View , 1972 .

[25]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[26]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .