Rapid human subjects research in times of disruption

One significant challenge facing the implementation of rapid research studies, or research that responds quickly to societal needs, involves the recruitment and retention of human subjects research participants. The purpose of this paper is to offer insights into the nuances of conducting rapid research during times of disruption. The first-hand accounts of participants experiencing disruption are critical and perishable. Although it may be difficult to recruit and retain participants, their data are needed to best understand and learn from novel, unprecedented situations. To this end, the authors draw from and analyze their experience conducting rapid research funded by the National Science Foundation to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on undergraduate education. The paper begins with a summary of the rapid project aims and research questions. Then, participant recruitment and retention challenges are briefly introduced as an advanced organizer of the paper. From there, the paper is structured in three sections that represent the human subjects research challenges faced during rapid study implementation. In the discussion, the authors summarize the above challenges and lessons learned in the larger context of rapid research. They reflect on a sometimes-forgotten issue: the wellbeing of research team members who face these and other salient challenges reflective of navigating life during a worldwide pandemic. By describing human subjects research challenges experienced in the implementation of a rapid study and lessons learned from experiencing and adapting to these challenges, this paper contributes meaningful insights into the daily challenges of carrying out rapid research.

[1]  S. Guikema,et al.  Interdisciplinary Theory, Methods, and Approaches for Hazards and Disaster Research: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 2021, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  N. Biddle,et al.  COVID-19 Survey Participation and Wellbeing: A Survey Experiment , 2021, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[3]  J. W. van de Lindt,et al.  Getting Interdisciplinary Teams into the Field: Institutional Review Board Preapproval and Multi‐Institution Authorization Agreements for Rapid Response Disaster Research , 2021, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  C. Ng,et al.  The prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities during the SARS and COVID-19 epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies , 2021, Journal of Affective Disorders.

[5]  K. Douglas,et al.  Recruitment and retention of participants in longitudinal studies after a natural disaster. , 2021, Longitudinal and life course studies : international journal.

[6]  Syahirah Abdul Rahman,et al.  Resilient Research in the Field: Insights and Lessons From Adapting Qualitative Research Projects During the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

[7]  Greg Oulahen,et al.  Quick Response Disaster Research: Opportunities and Challenges for a New Funding Program , 2020, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.

[8]  Ginger A. Johnson,et al.  Carrying Out Rapid Qualitative Research During a Pandemic: Emerging Lessons From COVID-19 , 2020, Qualitative health research.

[9]  R. Trimble COVID-19 Dashboard , 2020 .

[10]  Xinchun Wu,et al.  Rumination mediates the relationships of fear and guilt to posttraumatic stress disorder and posttraumatic growth among adolescents after the Ya’an earthquake , 2020, European journal of psychotraumatology.

[11]  U. Menon,et al.  Measuring quality and outcomes of research collaborations: An integrative review , 2019, Journal of clinical and translational science.

[12]  Ashley D. Ross,et al.  Expanding Social Science Through Disaster Studies , 2019, Social Science Quarterly.

[13]  Ginger A. Johnson,et al.  Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies: A systematic review of the literature. , 2017, Social science & medicine.

[14]  C. Hoppmann,et al.  Ecological Momentary Assessment , 2015 .

[15]  L. Luecken,et al.  Relations of SARS-related stressors and coping to Chinese college students' psychological adjustment during the 2003 Beijing SARS epidemic. , 2011, Journal of counseling psychology.

[16]  Susan Broyles Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). , 1994 .

[17]  John A. Bohn,et al.  Meeting the challenges , 2020, Law in the First Person Plural.

[18]  R. Clay Conducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, PsycEXTRA Dataset.

[19]  N. Wallerstein,et al.  Engaging the Community: Community-Based Participatory Research and Team Science , 2019, Strategies for Team Science Success.

[20]  Yasunao Otsubo,et al.  Predictive factors of psychological disorder development during recovery following SARS outbreak. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  B. Bogue,et al.  Meeting the Challenges of Cross-Institution Initiatives: An Inside View of a Successful Multi-Institution Collaboration , 2005 .