Some Causes of the Variable Shape of Flocks of Birds

Flocks of birds are highly variable in shape in all contexts (while travelling, avoiding predation, wheeling above the roost). Particularly amazing in this respect are the aerial displays of huge flocks of starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) above the sleeping site at dawn. The causes of this variability are hardly known, however. Here we hypothesise that variability of shape increases when there are larger local differences in movement behaviour in the flock. We investigate this hypothesis with the help of a model of the self-organisation of travelling groups, called StarDisplay, since such a model has also increased our understanding of what causes the oblong shape of schools of fish. The flocking patterns in the model prove to resemble those of real birds, in particular of starlings and rock doves. As to shape, we measure the relative proportions of the flock in several ways, which either depend on the direction of movement or do not. We confirm that flock shape is usually more variable when local differences in movement in the flock are larger. This happens when a) flock size is larger, b) interacting partners are fewer, c) the flock turnings are stronger, and d) individuals roll into the turn. In contrast to our expectations, when variability of speed in the flock is higher, flock shape and the positions of members in the flock are more static. We explain this and indicate the adaptive value of low variability of speed and spatial restriction of interaction and develop testable hypotheses.

[1]  Hauke Reuter,et al.  SELFORGANIZATION OF FISH SCHOOLS : AN OBJECT-ORIENTED MODEL , 1994 .

[2]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[3]  Jens Krause,et al.  Mortality risk of spatial positions in animal groups: The danger of being in the front , 1997 .

[4]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[5]  Leo R. M. Maas,et al.  Predator escape tactics in birds: linking ecology and aerodynamics , 2010 .

[6]  F. Heppner,et al.  Laboratory determination of startle reaction time of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Predator-avoidance behaviours of sand-eel schools: why schools seldom split , 1983 .

[8]  Flavia Chiarotti,et al.  Aerial flocking patterns of wintering starlings, Sturnus vulgaris, under different predation risk , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  D. Noakes,et al.  Predators and Prey in Fishes , 1983 .

[10]  C. K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Individual variation by self-organisation , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[11]  T Kambara,et al.  Behavior pattern (innate action) of individuals in fish schools generating efficient collective evasion from predation. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Neha Bhooshan,et al.  The Simulation of the Movement of Fish Schools , 2001 .

[13]  W ReynoldsCraig Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model , 1987 .

[14]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Emergence of Oblong School Shape: Models and Empirical Data of Fish , 2010 .

[15]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[16]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of fish schools , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Organized Shape and Frontal Density of Fish Schools , 2008 .

[18]  Yoshinobu Inada,et al.  Order and flexibility in the motion of fish schools. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  W. Nachtigall,et al.  Metabolic power of European starlings Sturnus vulgaris during flight in a wind tunnel, estimated from heat transfer modelling, doubly labelled water and mask respirometry , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  Christian A. Yates,et al.  Inherent noise can facilitate coherence in collective swarm motion , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  T. Pitcher Some ecological consequences of fish school volumes , 1980 .

[23]  Georg Skaret,et al.  Emerging school structures and collective dynamics in spawning herring: A simulation study , 2008 .

[24]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[25]  K. Dial Avian Flight , 2006 .

[26]  J. Michael Davis,et al.  The coordinated aerobatics of dunlin flocks , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Sariel Har-Peled,et al.  Efficiently approximating the minimum-volume bounding box of a point set in three dimensions , 1999, SODA '99.

[28]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  H. Pak,et al.  Dynamics of prey-flock escaping behavior in response to predator's attack. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  L. Dill,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of airborne bird flocks , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  E. Selous Thought Transference (or What ?) in Birds , 1932, Nature.

[33]  François Gerlotto,et al.  The three-dimensional morphology and internal structure of clupeid schools as observed using vertical scanning multibeam sonar , 2003 .

[34]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model , 2005 .

[35]  F. Heppner,et al.  Structure of Turning in Airborne Rock Dove (Columba livia) Flocks , 1992 .

[36]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  Iztok Lebar Bajec,et al.  Organized flight in birds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Coherent moving states in highway traffic , 1998, Nature.

[39]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Artificial Fish Schools: Collective Effects of School Size, Body Size, and Body Form , 2003, Artificial Life.

[40]  G. Parisi,et al.  Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  P. Fréon,et al.  Factors affecting information transfer from knowledgeable to naive individuals in groups , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  G. Huse,et al.  Modelling changes in migration pattern of herring: collective behaviour and numerical domination , 2002 .

[43]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-organised complex aerial displays of thousands of starlings: a model , 2009, 0908.2677.