Emissions from distributed vs. centralized generation: the importance of system performance

Distributed generation (DG) offers a number of potential benefits, but questions remain about environmental performance. Air emissions from five key DG technologies; gas engines, diesel engines, gas turbines, micro-turbines, and fuel cells, were systematically compared with total energy supply systems based on centralized gas turbines (CCGT) and coal steam turbines plus distributed heating (DH) using gas-fired boilers. Based on emissions and operational factors from existing commercially marketed DG-CHP technologies, combined heat and power (CHP) applications are considered, which are remotely monitored and operated as base-load supply. Emissions results are characterized using heat-to-power ratios (HPRs), which concisely describe different types of energy demand under different applications or seasonal conditions. At an HPR of zero (i.e. the special case of electricity-only), CCGT with DH gives the lowest emissions portfolio, but at HPR values typical for buildings in the United States, efficiency advantages ensure gas-fired combustion DG-CHP technologies become broadly competitive across the range of key emissions. Fuel cell DG-CHP provides a very low emissions portfolio, but at a significant cost premium. At higher HPR values, emissions from heat supply can become a key issue, leading to the surprising finding that some combustion-based DG-CHP systems have lower total emissions than fuel cell-based systems. Based on these insights, the paper concludes with a discussion of streamlined yet rigorous regulatory approaches for DG-CHP technologies.

[1]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Distributed generation and distribution utilities , 2002 .

[2]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  From planning to strategy in the electricity industry , 2001 .

[3]  Juliann Emmons Allison,et al.  Encouraging distributed generation of power that improves air quality: can we have our cake and eat it too? , 2002 .

[4]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Fundamentals of Air Pollution Engineering , 1988 .

[5]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Critical infrastructures : state of the art in research and application , 2003 .

[6]  Edward M. Meyers,et al.  Clean Distributed Generation: Policy Options to Promote Clean Air and Reliability , 2001 .

[7]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Electricity and Conflict: Advantages of a Distributed System , 2002 .

[8]  Willard W. Pulkrabek,et al.  Engineering Fundamentals of the Internal Combustion Engine , 1997 .

[9]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Distributed generation : a definition , 2001 .

[10]  Nathanael Greene,et al.  Small and Clean Is Beautiful: Exploring the Emissions of Distributed Generation and Pollution Prevention Policies , 2000 .

[11]  C Carcasci,et al.  Part load operating strategies for gas turbines in district heating applications , 2001 .

[12]  M. Thring.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[13]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 mitigation cost: A System Perspective on the Heating of Detached Houses , 2002 .

[14]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Applications of Environmental Valuation for Determining Externality Costs , 2000 .

[15]  Neil Strachan,et al.  System Implications of Distributed Generation , 2003 .

[16]  Stephen W. Chapel,et al.  The Distributed Utility:A New Electric Utility Planning and Pricing Paradigm , 1997 .

[17]  Christopher Yang,et al.  FUEL CELLS: Reaching the Era of Clean and Efficient Power Generation in the Twenty-First Century , 1999 .