Computerized identification of suspicious regions for masses in digitized mammograms.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES A simple and effective computerized detection scheme was developed to identify suspicious mass regions in digitized mammograms. METHODS This method identifies a maximum of five suspicious mass regions per image and was tested with a database of 510 images, including 162 verified masses. It includes a series of five rule-based processes that select one region with each of the following characteristics: 1) a global minimum of optical density in a smoothed image; 2) a local minimum of optical density in the original image; 3) a local minimum of optical density in a filtered image; 4) a small "mass" of low contrast; and 5) a small "mass" of high contrast. RESULTS This multi-stage process achieved a sensitivity of 95% while limiting false-positive detection rates to below an average of two per image. CONCLUSION Because this method limits the initial number of suspicious mass regions while retaining high sensitivity, it may be applicable to clinically usable computer-aided diagnosis schemes.

[1]  L V Ackerman,et al.  Computer screening of xeromammograms: a technique for defining suspicious areas of the breast. , 1979, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[2]  S. Lai,et al.  On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[3]  D Brzakovic,et al.  An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[4]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. , 1991, Medical physics.

[5]  W F Bischof,et al.  Automated detection and classification of breast tumors. , 1992, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[6]  K Doi,et al.  Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses. , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[7]  Ping Lu,et al.  Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of masses and clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  K Doi,et al.  Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. , 1994, Medical physics.

[9]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. , 1994, Medical physics.

[10]  Y H Chang,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[11]  D R Dance,et al.  Segmentation of mammograms using multiple linked self-organizing neural networks. , 1995, Medical physics.