A null model algorithm for presence-absence matrices based on proportional resampling

Ecological presence–absence matrices capture information of species occurrences among a number of sites. Statistical inference of matrix structure often used a fixed–fixed (FF) null model in which matrix entries are randomized, but the row and column total of each random matrix match those of the original matrix. However, in a stochastically assembled meta-community, row and column totals of a random assemblage might be expected to vary among matrices. Here we introduce a 4-step proportional–proportional (PP) algorithm that creates null matrices in which the row and column vary randomly, but the average row and column totals in a set of PP matrices are unbiased and match those of the original matrix. We tested the performance of the PP algorithm with 5 sets of artificial matrices and one large set of 288 published empirical matrices. Compared to the FF algorithm, the PP algorithm has better power to detect segregated and nested matrices, but it is vulnerable to Type I errors if row and column sums have small variances. The PP algorithm identified only 9% of empirical matrices as significantly segregated, compared with 30% identified by the traditional FF algorithm. The choice between whether to use the PP or the FF algorithm is similar to the distinction between random and fixed effects in a mixed-model ANOVA. For robust analysis, it may be desirable to use both the PP and the FF algorithms with the same data matrix.

[1]  N. Gotelli,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[2]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition? , 1979 .

[3]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  A Variance Test for Detecting Species Associations, with Some Example Applications , 1984 .

[4]  L. Stone,et al.  The checkerboard score and species distributions , 1990, Oecologia.

[5]  Wirt Atmar,et al.  A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition , 1997, Oecologia.

[6]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  The empirical Bayes approach as a tool to identify non-random species associations , 2010, Oecologia.

[7]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  L. R. Taylor,et al.  Specificity of the spatial power-law exponent in ecology and agriculture , 1988, Nature.

[9]  B. Manly,et al.  Null model analyses of presence–absence matrices need a definition of independence , 2009, Population Ecology.

[10]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[11]  Michael E. Gilpin,et al.  Examination of the “null” model of connor and simberloff for species co-occurrences on Islands , 2004, Oecologia.

[12]  Gary R. Graves,et al.  Macroecological signals of species interactions in the Danish avifauna , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  L. R. Taylor,et al.  Aggregation, Variance and the Mean , 1961, Nature.

[14]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Ecological assembly rules : perspectives, advances, retreats , 1999 .

[15]  N. Gotelli.  Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns , 2000 .

[16]  J. Reid.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2003 .

[17]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Disentangling community patterns of nestedness and species co‐occurrence , 2007 .

[18]  Steven J. Presley,et al.  A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of metacommunity structure , 2010 .

[19]  Paulo R. Guimarães,et al.  On nestedness analyses: rethinking matrix temperature and anti‐nestedness , 2007 .

[20]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  SPECIES CO‐OCCURRENCE: A META‐ANALYSIS OF J. M. DIAMOND'S ASSEMBLY RULES MODEL , 2002 .

[21]  E. Willis.  The composition of avian communities in remanescent woodlots in southern Brazil , 1979, Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia.

[22]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[23]  Arif Zaman,et al.  Random binary matrices in biogeographical ecology—Instituting a good neighbor policy , 2002, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[24]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consumer's guide to nestedness analysis , 2009 .

[25]  M. Skov,et al.  Paradoxical selective feeding on a low-nutrient diet: why do mangrove crabs eat leaves? , 2002, Oecologia.

[26]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Statistical challenges in null model analysis , 2012 .

[27]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Pattern detection in null model analysis , 2013 .

[28]  D. Jenkins.  In search of quorum effects in metacommunity structure: species co-occurrence analyses. , 2006, Ecology.

[29]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns. , 2007, Ecology.

[30]  János Podani,et al.  RANDOMIZATION OF PRESENCE–ABSENCE MATRICES: COMMENTS AND NEW ALGORITHMS , 2004 .