The paper resumes some of the conversations the authors had in three years of research, based on the review of best participatory planning practices worldwide. The case projects are selected and discussed with the protagonists across four leading issues: Simulation, Scenario and Visioning, Government and Governance, and Scale. The case-oriented discussion is a peculiarity of the book , contributing to give shape to future cities or regions. The aim is to build a critical thinking on how urban planning, policy and design issues are faced differently or similarly throughout every cases studied. The book include the description of computer models and media, socio-political experiments and professional practices which help communicating the future effects of different design, policy and planning strategies and schemes with a wide range of aims: from information, through consultation, towards active participation. The cases have confirmed that simulation tools can impact on local government and can drive new forms of "glocal" governance, shaping and implementing future plans and projects at different scale and time span. The following paragraphs will point at some of the constant thoughts the authors had around the selection and editing of the book's case studied and related issues
[1]
Dirk Helbing,et al.
From social simulation to integrative system design
,
2010,
ArXiv.
[2]
John Forester,et al.
The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes
,
1999
.
[3]
R. D. Jessop,et al.
A neo-gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes.
,
1997
.
[4]
Dirk Helbing.
Managing Complexity: Insights, Concepts, Applications
,
2007
.
[5]
Attila Szolnoki,et al.
Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions
,
2010,
PLoS Comput. Biol..