Discontinuous Change in University Web Sites: The Relative Importance of Reasons for Change

An examination of prior Web pages shows that the typical university will sometimes make a dis-continuous change to its Web site (i.e., a sudden, major shift in a Web site between two points in time). This exploratory empirical study examines reasons for such discontinuous changes, survey-ing university Webmasters at a variety of institutions where discontinuous Web site changes had occurred. Universities varied by type (public, private), by level (Bachelors, Masters, PhD), and by nation (Canada, USA). Four reasons for discontinuous Web site change, identified in an earlier study of discontinuous Web site change in state governments, were compared: rational, market-ing, political, and institutional. According to the university Webmasters surveyed, rational reasons for change were most important, followed by marketing, institutional, and political reasons, in that order. The ordering of reasons reflects statistically significant differences among types of reasons. Results did not vary by type, level, or nation.

[1]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  The evolution of US state government home pages from 1997 to 2002 , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Giuliano Noci,et al.  The company’s Web site: different configurations, evolutionary path , 2000 .

[3]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed , 2001 .

[4]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Organizational Change as Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structures in the Context of Information Technology Implementation , 2001 .

[5]  Patrick Dawson,et al.  Technology, Work Restructuring and the Orchestration of a Rational Narrative in the Pursuit of 'Management Objectives': The Political Process of Plant-level Change , 2000 .

[6]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational Practices: Human Resource Management in European Firms , 1999 .

[7]  Graham R. Massey,et al.  Product evolution: a Darwinian or Lamarckian phenomenon? , 1999 .

[8]  David A. Buchanan,et al.  The way it really happened: Competing narratives in the political process of technological change , 2005 .

[9]  Raj Mehta,et al.  Market Motives, Distinctive Capabilities, and Domestic Inertia: A Hybrid Model of Innovation Generation , 1999 .

[10]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Detours in the Path toward Strategic Information Systems Alignment , 2001 .

[11]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  R. A. Groeneveld,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed). , 1981 .

[13]  C. Borror Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd Ed. , 2001 .

[14]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[15]  Marc Najork,et al.  A large‐scale study of the evolution of Web pages , 2004, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[16]  Mikio Aoyama Continuous and discontinuous software evolution: aspects of software evolution across multiple product lines , 2001, IWPSE '01.