Nonlinear Froude-Krylov and viscous drag representations for wave energy converters in the computation/fidelity continuum

Abstract Designing, optimizing and controlling a wave energy converter requires the construction of a mathematical model in order to simulate the behaviour of the device. Given the nonlinear nature of fluid-structure interactions, the definition of the model is not straightforward and should take into account the specific application it is intended for. Two of the most important characteristics of a model are the computational time and the expected accuracy, which usually are mutually conflicting. The inclusion of nonlinearities potentially increases the model accuracy, but at a higher computational price. Considering a heaving wave energy converter with and without the application of latching control, this paper studies and compares nine different modelling options, eight of which are based on potential theory and consider nonlinear Froude-Krylov and viscous drag forces, while one is based on fully-nonlinear computational fluid dynamics. The value of including nonlinearities in the hydrodynamic model is discussed in relation to the computational cost of the eventual accuracy benefits, under a range of scenarios.

[1]  Sophie Papst,et al.  Computational Methods For Fluid Dynamics , 2016 .

[2]  John Ringwood,et al.  A Review of Non-Linear Approaches for Wave Energy Converter Modelling , 2015 .

[3]  R. Temam,et al.  Navier-Stokes equations: theory and numerical analysis: R. Teman North-Holland, Amsterdam and New York. 1977. 454 pp. US $45.00 , 1978 .

[4]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters , 2012 .

[5]  J. Gilloteaux,et al.  Mouvements de grande amplitude d'un corps flottant en fluide parfait. Application à la récupération de l'énergie des vagues. , 2007 .

[6]  Bernard Molin,et al.  Hydrodynamique des Structures Offshore , 2012 .

[7]  John Ringwood,et al.  Nonlinear Hydrodynamic Models for Heaving BuoyWave Energy Converters , 2016 .

[8]  John Ringwood,et al.  Implementation of latching control in a numerical wave tank with regular waves , 2016 .

[9]  J. Falnes Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems , 2002 .

[10]  John Ringwood,et al.  Computationally efficient nonlinear Froude–Krylov force calculations for heaving axisymmetric wave energy point absorbers , 2017 .

[11]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Hybrid frequency-time domain models for dynamic response analysis of marine structures , 2008 .

[12]  Jørgen Fredsøe,et al.  A wave generation toolbox for the open‐source CFD library: OpenFoam® , 2012 .

[13]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  Assessment of Viscous Damping via 3D-CFD Modelling of a Floating Wave Energy Device , 2015 .

[14]  John Ringwood,et al.  A Nonlinear Extension for Linear Boundary Element Methods in Wave Energy Device Modelling , 2012 .

[15]  A. Robin Wallace,et al.  A Fully Coupled Wave-to-Wire Model of an Array of Wave Energy Converters , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[16]  John Ringwood,et al.  Nonlinear Froude-Krylov force modelling for two heaving wave energy point absorbers , 2015 .

[17]  J. R. Morison,et al.  The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles , 1950 .

[18]  António F.O. Falcão,et al.  Phase control through load control of oscillating-body wave energy converters with hydraulic PTO system , 2008 .

[19]  G. H. Keulegan,et al.  Forces on cylinders and plates in an oscillating fluid , 1958 .

[20]  G. Giorgi Consistency of Viscous Drag Identification Tests for Wave Energy Applications , 2017 .

[21]  Nicholas Jenkins,et al.  Optimisation of a clutch-rectified power take off system for a heaving wave energy device in irregular waves with experimental comparison , 2014 .

[22]  John Ringwood,et al.  Comparing nonlinear hydrodynamic forces in heaving point absorbers and oscillating wave surge converters , 2018 .