Tactile information improves visual object discrimination in kea, Nestor notabilis, and capuchin monkeys, Sapajus spp.

In comparative visual cognition research, the influence of information acquired by nonvisual senses has received little attention. Systematic studies focusing on how the integration of information from sight and touch can affect animal perception are sparse. Here, we investigated whether tactile input improves visual discrimination ability of a bird, the kea, and capuchin monkeys, two species with acute vision, and known for their tendency to handle objects. To this end, we assessed whether, at the attainment of a criterion, accuracy and/or learning speed in the visual modality were enhanced by haptic (i.e. active tactile) exploration of an object. Subjects were trained to select the positive stimulus between two cylinders of the same shape and size, but with different surface structures. In the Sight condition, one pair of cylinders was inserted into transparent Plexiglas tubes. This prevented animals from haptically perceiving the objects' surfaces. In the Sight and Touch condition, one pair of cylinders was not inserted into transparent Plexiglas tubes. This allowed the subjects to perceive the objects' surfaces both visually and haptically. We found that both kea and capuchins (1) showed comparable levels of accuracy at the attainment of the learning criterion in both conditions, but (2) required fewer trials to achieve the criterion in the Sight and Touch condition. Moreover, this study showed that both kea and capuchins can integrate information acquired by the visual and tactile modalities. To our knowledge, this represents the first evidence of visuotactile integration in a bird species. Overall, our findings demonstrate that the acquisition of tactile information while manipulating objects facilitates visual discrimination of objects in two phylogenetically distant species.

[1]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Factors affecting cashew processing by wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus, Kerr 1792) , 2016, American journal of primatology.

[2]  B. Winters,et al.  Delineating prefrontal cortex region contributions to crossmodal object recognition in rats. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Aike Guo,et al.  Crossmodal Interactions Between Olfactory and Visual Learning in Drosophila , 2005, Science.

[4]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  Electrical neuroimaging of memory discrimination based on single-trial multisensory learning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[5]  Lawrence Weiskrantz,et al.  Demonstration of cross-modal matching in rhesus monkeys, Macaca Mulatta , 1975, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  B. Stein,et al.  The Merging of the Senses , 1993 .

[7]  Candy Rowe,et al.  Multisensory learning: from experimental psychology to animal training , 2005 .

[8]  E. Pouydebat,et al.  Motivation and manipulation capacities of the blue and yellow macaw and the tufted capuchin: A comparative approach , 2014, Behavioural Processes.

[9]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  The eyes grasp, the hands see: Metric category knowledge transfers between vision and touch , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[10]  L. Harris,et al.  Footedness in parrots: three centuries of research, theory, and mere surmise. , 1989, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  A. Bond,et al.  Kea, Bird of Paradox: The Evolution and Behavior of a New Zealand Parrot , 1999 .

[12]  V. Truppa,et al.  Hand use by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) to extract a small food item from a tube: digit movements, hand preference, and performance , 2007, American journal of primatology.

[13]  M Petrides,et al.  Cross-modal matching and the primate frontal cortex. , 1976, Science.

[14]  R. K. Davenport,et al.  Intermodal Equivalence of Stimuli in Apes , 1970, Science.

[15]  Zoe P. Demery,et al.  Vision, touch and object manipulation in Senegal parrots Poicephalus senegalus , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Valentina Truppa,et al.  Versatile grasping ability in power-grip actions by tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.). , 2016, American journal of physical anthropology.

[17]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: Experimental and computational studies , 2013, Cognition.

[18]  Boyer D. Winters,et al.  The neural bases of crossmodal object recognition in non-human primates and rodents: A review , 2015, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  M. Murray,et al.  The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  R. Lawson A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape , 2004, Perception & Psychophysics.

[22]  L. Huber,et al.  The advantage of objects over images in discrimination and reversal learning by kea, Nestor notabilis , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  The temporal dependence of exploration on neotic style in birds , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[24]  R. C. Elliott Cross-modal recognition in three primates , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Benefits of multisensory learning , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  K. James,et al.  Cross-modal versus within-modal recall: Differences in behavioral and brain responses , 2011, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  C. Spence,et al.  The cognitive and neural correlates of “tactile consciousness”: A multisensory perspective , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  A. Cowey,et al.  Cross-modal matching in the rhesus monkey using a single pair of stimuli , 1975, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Monica Gori,et al.  Impaired visual size-discrimination in children with movement disorders , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  C. M. Rogers,et al.  Cross-modal perception in apes: Altered visual cues and delay , 1975, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  A. Rylands,et al.  How Different Are Robust and Gracile Capuchin Monkeys? An Argument for the Use of Sapajus and Cebus , 2012, American journal of primatology.

[32]  D. Hanuš,et al.  Does Presentation Format Influence Visual Size Discrimination in Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus spp.)? , 2015, PloS one.

[33]  L. Huber,et al.  Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[34]  M. Knaden,et al.  Desert ants benefit from combining visual and olfactory landmarks , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[35]  Kenneth L Chiou,et al.  Explosive Pleistocene range expansion leads to widespread Amazonian sympatry between robust and gracile capuchin monkeys , 2012 .

[36]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Brains, Innovations and Evolution in Birds and Primates , 2004, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[37]  L. Huber,et al.  Social learning affects object exploration and manipulation in keas, Nestor notabilis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  C. Rowe Sound improves visual discrimination learning in avian predators , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Prehension in Cebus and Saimiri: I. Grip type and hand preference , 1988, American Journal of Primatology.

[40]  Nicola S. Clayton,et al.  The Mentality of Crows: Convergent Evolution of Intelligence in Corvids and Apes , 2004, Science.

[41]  Valentina Truppa,et al.  Grasping behavior in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): grip types and manual laterality for picking up a small food item. , 2004, American journal of physical anthropology.

[42]  G. Gajdon,et al.  Picture – Object Recognition in Kea (Nestor notabilis) , 2015 .

[43]  X. Nelson,et al.  Intraspecific variation in the foraging ecology of kea, the world's only mountain- and rainforest-dwelling parrot , 2015 .

[44]  Boyer D Winters,et al.  A Distributed Cortical Representation Underlies Crossmodal Object Recognition in Rats , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  G. Berkeley Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision , 2004 .

[46]  Onur Güntürkün,et al.  The convergent evolution of neural substrates for cognition , 2012, Psychological research.

[47]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  The Complete Capuchin: The Biology of the Genus Cebus , 2004 .

[48]  Dorothy Fragaszy,et al.  Manual Function in Cebus apella. Digital Mobility, Preshaping, and Endurance in Repetitive Grasping , 2000, International Journal of Primatology.

[49]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  Cognition without Cortex , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[51]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Polymorphism of the 3′-UTR of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT) in New World monkeys , 2016, Primates.

[52]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Do capuchin monkeys use weight to select hammer tools? , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[53]  B. Winters,et al.  Crossmodal object recognition in rats with and without multimodal object pre-exposure: No effect of hippocampal lesions , 2012, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[54]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Kea (Nestor notabilis) consider spatial relationships between objects in the support problem , 2009, Biology Letters.