Evaluation of Spatial Resolution for Heavy Ion CT System Based on the Measurement of Residual Range Distribution With HIMAC

We report experimental results from a heavy ion CT system based on the measurement of residual range distribution using an X-ray intensifying screen and a charged coupled device (CCD) camera system. This technique was first investigated by Zygmanski (2000) for proton beams, and they reported that the spatial resolution was significantly degraded by multiple Coulomb scattering (MCS) effects in the irradiated medium. Experiments were done on the spatial resolution phantom by using helium and carbon beams accelerated up to 120 MeV/u and 230 MeV/u by the Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC), installed in the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) in Japan, using a high performance intensified CCD (ICCD) camera. We show that the MCS blurring effect can be significantly reduced in the reconstructed image by using a carbon beam with this technique. Our results suggest that heavier particles such as carbon would be more useful if this technique is envisioned as a clinical tool to obtain data that would aid proton and/or heavy ion treatment planning.

[1]  C A Tobias,et al.  Heavy-Particle Radiography , 1973, Science.

[2]  J. Debus,et al.  Experience with carbon ion radiotherapy at GSI , 2005 .

[3]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Fourier correction for spatially variant collimator blurring in SPECT , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  Paul R. Edholm,et al.  Novel Properties Of The Fourier Decomposition Of The Sinogram , 1986, Other Conferences.

[5]  Z. Liang,et al.  Bayesian image processing of data from constrained source distributions—I. non-valued, uncorrelated and correlated constraints , 1987 .

[6]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  H. Sadrozinski,et al.  Design of a proton computed tomography system for applications in proton radiation therapy , 2004, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[8]  V. Bashkirovb,et al.  Issues in Proton Computed Tomography , 2003 .

[9]  Tatsuaki Kanai,et al.  Measurement of electron density distribution using heavy ion CT , 2004 .

[10]  Z. Liang,et al.  Bayesian image processing of data from constrained source distributions—II. valued, uncorrelated and correlated constraints , 1987 .

[11]  Cinzia Talamonti,et al.  The Italian project for a proton imaging device , 2007 .

[12]  P Zygmanski,et al.  The measurement of proton stopping power using proton-cone-beam computed tomography. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  G. Cuttone,et al.  Monte Carlo Studies of a Proton Computed Tomography System , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  Yoshihisa Takada,et al.  Proton computed tomography with a 250 MeV pulsed beam , 1988 .

[15]  Barbara Kaser-Hotz,et al.  Patient specific optimization of the relation between CT-hounsfield units and proton stopping power with proton radiography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[16]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY USING PROTON ENERGY LOSS , 1981, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[17]  Tatsuaki Kanai,et al.  Application of heavy-ion CT , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  B. Rossi,et al.  Cosmic-Ray Theory , 1941 .

[20]  Zhengrong Liang,et al.  Reconstruction for proton computed tomography by tracing proton trajectories: a Monte Carlo study. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  D F Jackson,et al.  Small-angle multiple scattering and spatial resolution in charged particle tomography. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  D. Williams,et al.  The most likely path of an energetic charged particle through a uniform medium. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Tetsuo Inada,et al.  Heavy ion CT system based on measurement of residual range distribution. , 2002, Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics.

[24]  Hayes,et al.  Review of Particle Physics. , 1996, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[25]  A M Koehler,et al.  Quantitative proton tomography: preliminary experiments. , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  D F Jackson,et al.  The relation between X-ray CT numbers and charged particle stopping powers and its significance for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  S Minohara,et al.  Biophysical characteristics of HIMAC clinical irradiation system for heavy-ion radiation therapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.