Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking?

The authors have shown that an object appearing abruptly in a previously blank location is efficiently detected in visual search when it is embedded in an array of objects without abrupt onset (term no-onset stimuli). In these experiments, no-onset stimuli appeared well before the onset stimulus but were camouflaged by additional line segments rendering the stimuli unidentifiable. B. S. Gibson (1996) claims that the availability of the no-onset stimuli was delayed relative to that of the abrupt onset stimulus because of forward masking. The authors show that forward masking is unlikely to be a significant factor in their experiments, and 3 new experiments are reported that undermine Gibson's masking account. Observed differences in the efficiency with which onset and no-onset stimuli are processed in visual search are due to attentional capture by new perceptual objects and to a relatively sluggish process of updating existing object representations.

[1]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention? , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  S. Yantis Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .

[4]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal luminance summation effects in backward and forward masking , 1966 .

[5]  W. S. McCulloch,et al.  Aspects of the Theory of Artificial Intelligence , 1962, Springer US.

[6]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  V. Lollo Temporal integration in visual memory. , 1980 .

[8]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  L. Stelmach,et al.  Directed attention and perception of temporal order. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  B. Gibson,et al.  Visual quality and attentional capture: a challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J T Todd,et al.  Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[16]  S. Yantis Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[21]  V Di Lollo,et al.  Inverse-intensity effect in duration of visible persistence. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  M. Turvey On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. , 1973, Psychological review.

[23]  Naomi Weisstein,et al.  Metacontrast as a function of spatial separation with narrow line targets and masks , 1977, Vision Research.

[24]  Donald M. MacKay,et al.  Theoretical Models of Space Perception , 1962 .

[25]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). , 1993 .

[26]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Visual masking : an integrative approach , 1984 .

[27]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.