On the robustness of the consumer homogeneity assumption with respect to the discount factor for remanufactured products

Abstract The strategic closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) literature makes the assumption that a consumer’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a remanufactured product is a fraction of his/her WTP for the corresponding new product, and this fraction, called discount factor, is assumed to be constant among consumers. Recent empirical research challenges this assumption, by showing that there is considerable variability in discount factors among consumers. This paper considers a complex model in the CLSC literature: strategic remanufacturing under quality choice, and compares its solution under constant discount factors with the solution that assumes a probability distribution for the discount factors (which is analytically intractable and must be obtained numerically). We consider quality choice and remanufacturing for both monopoly and competitive cases. Overall, we find remarkable consistency between the results of the constant and variable discount factor models. Thus, we make a convincing argument that the constant discount factor assumption is robust and can be used due to its tractability.

[1]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies , 2006 .

[2]  Gilvan C. Souza Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Critical Review, and Future Research , 2013, Decis. Sci..

[3]  Rainer Kleber,et al.  The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products , 2017 .

[4]  Michael R. Galbreth,et al.  Product Reuse in Innovative Industries , 2013 .

[5]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[6]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[7]  Vered Blass,et al.  Economic and Environmental Assessment of Remanufacturing Strategies for Product + Service Firms , 2014 .

[8]  Ruud H. Teunter,et al.  Matching Demand and Supply to Maximize Profits from Remanufacturing , 2003, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[9]  L. Beril Toktay,et al.  Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Atalay Atasu,et al.  Remanufacturing, Third-Party Competition, and Consumers' Perceived Value of New Products , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Ken Kelley,et al.  Sample size for multiple regression: obtaining regression coefficients that are accurate, not simply significant. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[12]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Managing New and Remanufactured Products , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[13]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  The Potential for Cannibalization of New Products Sales by Remanufactured Products , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[14]  Harvey M. Wagner,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 1995, Oper. Res..

[15]  S. Ryan,et al.  Optimal Price and Quantity of Refurbished Products , 2006 .

[16]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .

[17]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  Relicensing as a Secondary Market Strategy , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Adem Orsdemir,et al.  Competitive Quality Choice and Remanufacturing , 2014 .

[19]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  How Does Product Recovery Affect Quality Choice? , 2013 .

[20]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  So What If Remanufacturing Cannibalizes My New Product Sales? , 2010 .

[21]  L. Beril Toktay,et al.  How Collection Cost Structure Drives a Manufacturer's Reverse Channel Choice , 2013 .

[22]  James D. Abbey,et al.  Remanufactured Products in Closed‐Loop Supply Chains for Consumer Goods , 2015 .

[23]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Closed-Loop Supply Chains : New Developments to Improve the Sustainability of Business Practices , 2010 .

[24]  Anton Ovchinnikov,et al.  Revenue and Cost Management for Remanufactured Products , 2011 .

[25]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Remanufacturing and the component commonality decision , 2013 .

[26]  Alper Atamtürk,et al.  Capacity Acquisition, Subcontracting, and Lot Sizing , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Ramanath Subramanyam,et al.  Key Factors in the Market for Remanufactured Products , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[28]  H. Groenevelt,et al.  COMPETITION IN REMANUFACTURING , 2001 .