Intra- and interobserver analysis in the morphological assessment of early stage embryos during an IVF procedure: a multicentre study

BackgroundQuality control programs are necessary to maintain good clinical practice. Embryo grading has been described as one of the external quality assurance schemes. Although the evaluation of embryos is based on the assessment of morphological characteristics, considerable intra- and inter-observer variability has been described. In this multicentre study, the variability in the embryo evaluation has been evaluated using morphological characteristics on day 1, day 2 and day 3 of embryo development.MethodsFive embryologists of four different IVF centers participated in this study. Multilevel images of embryos were presented on a website at different time points to evaluate intra-and inter-observer agreement in the assessment of embryo morphology. The embryos were evaluated on day 1, day 2 and day 3 of their development and each embryologist had to decide if the embryo had to be transferred, cryopreserved or discarded.ResultsBoth intra-observer agreement and inter-observer agreement were good to excellent for the position of the pronuclei on day 1, the number of blastomeres on day 2 and day 3 and the clinical decision (transfer, cryopreservation, discard). For all other characteristics (size of pronuclei, presence of cytoplasomic halo, degree of fragmentation and size of blastomeres) the intra- and inter-observer agreement was moderate to very poor.ConclusionsMono- or multicentre quality control on embryo scoring by morphological assessment can easily be performed through the design of a simple website. In the future the website design can be adapted to generate statistical feedback upon scoring and can even include a training module.

[1]  D V Cicchetti,et al.  Assessing Inter-Rater Reliability for Rating Scales: Resolving some Basic Issues , 1976, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  P. Matson Internal quality control and external quality assurance in the IVF laboratory. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[4]  R. Kurzawa,et al.  Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization. , 2004, Reproductive biology.

[5]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[6]  Søren Ziebe,et al.  Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments. , 2005, Human reproduction.

[7]  Jacob F Mayer,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  J. Castilla,et al.  Comparison of methods to determine the assigned value in an external quality control programme for embryo evaluation. , 2009, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[9]  T. D’Hooghe,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos , 2009, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[10]  J. Castilla,et al.  External quality control for embryology laboratories. , 2010, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[11]  C. Racowsky,et al.  Standardization of grading embryo morphology , 2010, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[12]  J. Vermeesch,et al.  Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  C. Racowsky,et al.  National collection of embryo morphology data into Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere asymmetry, and live birth rate. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.