Numerical competence in animals, with an insight from ants

Summary We survey a variety of experimental paradigms for studying animal abilities to count, to understand numerical information and to perform simple arithmetic operations. There is a huge body of evidence that different forms and elements of quantitative judgement and numerical competence are spread across a wide range of species, both vertebrate and invertebrate. Here we pay particular attention to the display of numerical competence in ants. The reason is that most of the existing experimental schemes for studying numerical processing in animals, although often elegant, are restricted by studying subjects at the individual level, or by the use of artificial communicative systems. In contrast, the information-theoretic approach that was elaborated for studying number-related skills in ants employs their own communicative means and, thus, does not require the subjects to solve any artificial learning problems, such as learning intermediary languages, or even learning to solve multiple choice problems. Using this approach, it was discovered that members of highly social ant species possessed numerical competence. They were shown to be able to pass information about numbers and to perform simple arithmetic operations with small numbers. We suggest that applying ideas of information theory and using the natural communication systems of highly social animals can open new horizons in studying numerical cognition.

[1]  D. J. Murray,et al.  E.H. Weber on the Tactile Senses , 2018 .

[2]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Imprinted numbers: newborn chicks' sensitivity to number vs. continuous extent of objects they have been reared with. , 2010, Developmental science.

[3]  Claudia Uller,et al.  Quantity discrimination in salamanders , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  Holly C. Miller,et al.  “counting” by pigeons: Discrimination of the number of biologically relevant sequential events , 2010, Learning & behavior.

[5]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Ant Encounters: Interaction Networks and Colony Behavior , 2010 .

[6]  Michael J. Beran,et al.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) accurately compare poured liquid quantities , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[7]  D. Premack Why Humans Are Unique: Three Theories , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[8]  Jennifer J. Pokorny,et al.  Monkeys recognize the faces of group mates in photographs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Boris Ryabko,et al.  The use of ideas of Information Theory for studying "language" and intelligence in ants , 2009, Entropy.

[10]  Valen E. Johnson,et al.  General Intelligence in Another Primate: Individual Differences across Cognitive Task Performance in a New World Monkey (Saguinus oedipus) , 2009, PloS one.

[11]  C. Uller,et al.  Horses (Equus caballus) select the greater of two quantities in small numerical contrasts , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[12]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Beyond the number domain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  A. Dornhaus Specialization Does Not Predict Individual Efficiency in an Ant , 2008, PLoS biology.

[14]  K. Burns,et al.  Adaptive numerical competency in a food-hoarding songbird , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  I. Malyukova,et al.  Intellectual activity during formation of quantitative concepts in the lower and higher monkeys , 2008, Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology.

[16]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures , 2008, Science.

[17]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Evidence for counting in insects , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[18]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[19]  M. Beran,et al.  Summation and quantity judgments of sequentially presented sets by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2008, American journal of primatology.

[20]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols? , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  José Luis Bermúdez,et al.  Thinking Without Words , 2007 .

[22]  J. Dale,et al.  Individual recognition: it is good to be different. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  M. Beran Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) succeed in a test of quantity conservation , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[24]  Z. Reznikova Dialog with black box: using Information Theory to study animal language behaviour , 2007, acta ethologica.

[25]  D. Washburn,et al.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) select Arabic numerals or visual quantities corresponding to a number of sequentially completed maze trials , 2007, Learning & behavior.

[26]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  A common representational system governed by Weber's law: nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[27]  M. Beran Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) succeed on a computerized test designed to assess conservation of discrete quantity , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[28]  A. S. Alekseeva,et al.  The ability of rhesus macaques to perform elementary mathematical actions , 2006, Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology.

[29]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  The representation of numerical magnitude , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  I. Pepperberg Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus) numerical abilities: addition and further experiments on a zero-like concept. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[31]  A. Smith,et al.  Relative numerousness judgment and summation in young and old Western lowland gorillas. , 2005, Journal of comparative psychology.

[32]  Andrew A. Pierce,et al.  Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, can distinguish more over-marks from fewer over-marks , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[33]  Laurie R Santos,et al.  Expectations about numerical events in four lemur species (Eulemur fulvus, Eulemur mongoz, Lemur catta and Varecia rubra) , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[34]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[35]  T. Matsuzawa The Ai project: historical and ecological contexts , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[36]  Jonathan J. Cooper,et al.  Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) , 2003 .

[37]  Onur Güntürkün,et al.  A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity , 2003, Learning & behavior.

[38]  W. Meck Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing , 2003 .

[39]  Masaki Tomonaga,et al.  Enumeration of briefly presented items by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens) , 2002, Animal learning & behavior.

[40]  S. Carey,et al.  Spontaneous representation of number in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[41]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Numerical Subtraction in the Pigeon: Evidence for a Linear Subjective Number Scale , 2001, Psychological science.

[42]  R. Menzel,et al.  Cognitive architecture of a mini-brain: the honeybee , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  J. Call,et al.  Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[44]  J. Delius,et al.  Matching of numerical symbols with number of responses by pigeons , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[45]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  A A Smirnova,et al.  Use of number by crows: investigation by matching and oddity learning. , 2000, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[47]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[49]  L. Parr,et al.  Visual kin recognition in chimpanzees , 1999, Nature.

[50]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[51]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays , 1998, Nature.

[52]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Judgments of ordinality and summation of number symbols by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). , 1997 .

[53]  Jacky Emmerton,et al.  Pigeons’ serial ordering of numerosity with visual arrays , 1997 .

[54]  Boris Ryabko,et al.  Using Shannon entropy and Kolmogorov complexity to study the communicative system and cognitive capacities in ants , 1996, Complex..

[55]  H. Hodges Maze procedures: the radial-arm and water maze compared. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[56]  R. Morse The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees , 1994 .

[57]  C. Packer,et al.  Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Addition and subtraction by human infants , 1992, Nature.

[59]  G. Berntson,et al.  Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[60]  H. Davis,et al.  Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[61]  D M Rumbaugh,et al.  Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[62]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Use of numbers by a chimpanzee , 1985, Nature.

[63]  R K Thomas,et al.  Conceptual numerousness judgments by squirrel monkeys. , 1980, The American journal of psychology.

[64]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The Child's Understanding of Number , 1979 .

[65]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[66]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon , 1964, Science.

[67]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[68]  O. Koehler,et al.  Vom Erlernen unbenannter Anzahlen bei Vögeln , 1941, Naturwissenschaften.

[69]  J. P. Porter A Preliminary Study of the Psychology of the English Sparrow , 1904 .

[70]  C. Darwin The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[71]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Rudiments of mind: Insights through the chick model on number and space cognition in animals , 2010 .

[72]  R. Gerlai,et al.  Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber’s law , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[73]  M. Beran Chimpanzees as Natural Accountants , 2009 .

[74]  Zhanna Reznikova,et al.  Experimental paradigms for studying cognition and communication in ants (Hymeno- ptera: Formicidae) , 2008 .

[75]  T. Sato,et al.  Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[76]  M. Beran,et al.  Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[77]  E. Font,et al.  Quantity discrimination in Tenebrio molitor: evidence of numerosity discrimination in an invertebrate? , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[78]  E. Spelke,et al.  Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian cultures , 2008 .

[79]  Zhanna Reznikova,et al.  Animal Intelligence: From Individual to Social Cognition , 2007 .

[80]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  How much does number matter to a monkey (Macaca mulatta)? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[81]  Katherine D. Kinzler,et al.  Core knowledge. , 2007, Developmental science.

[82]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Comparative cognition of object recognition. , 2006 .

[83]  F. D. Waal,et al.  Infant chimpanzee and human child , 2002 .

[84]  Boris Ryabko,et al.  A Study of Ants' Numerical Competence , 2001, Electron. Trans. Artif. Intell..

[85]  George A. Mazokhin-Porshnyakov,et al.  Learning in Bees and Wasps in Complicated Experimental Tasks , 2000 .

[86]  Holk Cruse,et al.  Adaptive behavior and intelligent systems without symbols and logic , 2000 .

[87]  Zh. I. Reznikova ETHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF POPULATION DENSITY CONTROL IN COADAPTIVE COMPLEXES OF ANTS , 1999 .

[88]  Duane M. Rumbaugh,et al.  Chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes) Counting in a Computerized Testing Paradigm , 1998 .

[89]  S. Shettleworth Cognition, evolution, and behavior , 1998 .

[90]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Quantity-based interference and symbolic representations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[91]  Z. Reznikova,et al.  Experimental study of the antsʾ communication system, with the application of the Information Theory approach , 1994 .

[92]  Sarah T. Boysen,et al.  Counting in Chimpanzees: Nonhuman Principles and Emergent Properties of Number , 1993 .

[93]  Randall R. Reeves,et al.  The Bottlenose dolphin , 1990 .

[94]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  Counting in rats: Its functional significance and the independent cognitive processes that constitute it. , 1988 .

[95]  Timothy V. Gill,et al.  Acquisition and Use of Mathematical Skills by a Linguistic Chimpanzee , 1977 .

[96]  R. Rosengren,et al.  Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). I. Age polyethism and topographic traditions , 1977 .

[97]  R. Rosengren Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). II. Nocturnal orientation and diel periodicity , 1977 .

[98]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1971 .

[99]  Erich Wasmann,et al.  Die psychischen Fähigkeiten der Ameisen : mit einem Ausblick auf die vergleichende Tierpsychologie , 1909 .

[100]  A. Kinnaman Mental life of two Macacus Rhesus monkeys in captivity. I. , 1902 .

[101]  C. Darwin The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, Vol. 1, (2nd ed.). , 1898 .

[102]  J. B.,et al.  The Power of Numerical Discrimination , 1871, Nature.