Triamcinolone acetonide and hexacetonide intra-articular treatment of symmetrical joints in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that the biological effect of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is equivalent to that of triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH), if used at double the dosage. In this study we compared the efficacy of intra-articular TA at a dose twice that of TH in symmetrically involved joints, in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHOD Children with active arthritis and a similar degree of inflammation in two symmetrical joints were enrolled in the study. The symmetry was assessed by both clinical examination and synovial fluid analysis. The dose given was 1 mg/kg up to 40 mg of TH or 2.0 mg/kg up to 80 mg of TA. The identity of injected compound was blinded to the patient and to the physician. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients, 30 female, seven male, with JIA, entered the study. A total of 86 joints were injected. Twenty-one (53.8%) of the joints injected with TA relapsed first compared with only six (15.4%) of the joints injected with TH. In three (7.7%) relapse occurred simultaneously. Nine (23%) were still in remission after 24-month follow-up. The percentage of joints with lasting remission was higher with TH than with TA (80 vs 47.5% after 12 months and 63.6 vs 32.4% after 24 months, respectively; log rank test P = 0.003). CONCLUSION Even when TA is given at higher doses, TH is more effective and should be considered the drug of choice for intra-articular treatment of JIA.

[1]  A. Cats,et al.  Intra-articular steroids in pauciarticular juvenile chronic arthritis, type 1 , 2005, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[2]  F. Zacchello,et al.  Comparison of intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide and triamcinolone acetonide in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. , 2003, Rheumatology.

[3]  M. Frosch,et al.  A subgroup-specific evaluation of the efficacy of intraarticular triamcinolone hexacetonide in juvenile chronic arthritis. , 2000, The Journal of rheumatology.

[4]  L. Schanberg,et al.  Prevention of leg length discrepancy in young children with pauciarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis by treatment with intraarticular steroids. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  M. Suarez‐Almazor,et al.  Revision of the proposed classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Durban, 1997. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.

[6]  P. Dent,et al.  Intra-articular corticosteroids in the treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. , 1998, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[7]  S. Padeh,et al.  Intraarticular corticosteroid injection in the management of children with chronic arthritis. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  H. Huppertz,et al.  Transient suppression of endogenous cortisol production after intraarticular steroid therapy for chronic arthritis in children. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[9]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis , 1997, The Lancet.

[10]  D. Felson,et al.  Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritis. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  A. Tschammler,et al.  Intraarticular corticosteroids for chronic arthritis in children: efficacy and effects on cartilage and growth. , 1995, The Journal of pediatrics.

[12]  M. E. Moore,et al.  Preferred intraarticular corticosteroids and associated practice: a survey of members of the American College of Rheumatology. , 1994, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[13]  A. Stirling,et al.  Pain relief in the rheumatoid knee after steroid injection. A single-blind comparison of hydrocortisone succinate, and triamcinolone acetonide or hexacetonide. , 1994, British journal of rheumatology.

[14]  Vea Honkanen,et al.  Intra‐articular glucocorticoids in early juvenile chronic arthritis , 1993, Acta paediatrica.

[15]  J. Lancaster Bioluminescence and chemiluminescence. Current status: Edited by Philip E. Stanley and Larry J. Kricka. Pp. 570. Wiley, Chichester. 1991. £80.00 , 1991 .

[16]  Malleson Pn,et al.  Remodelling the pyramid--a pediatric prospective. , 1990 .

[17]  C. Job-Deslandre,et al.  Complications of intra-articular injections of triamcinolone hexacetonide in chronic arthritis in children. , 1990, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[18]  Z. Balogh,et al.  Triamcinolone hexacetonide versus betamethasone. A double-blind comparative study of the long-term effects of intra-articular steroids in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[19]  R. Petty,et al.  Intraarticular triamcinolone hexacetonide in the management of chronic arthritis in children. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  H. Möllmann,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glucocorticoid suspensions after intra‐articular administration , 1986, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[21]  P. H. Kendall Triamcinolone hexacetonide. A new corticosteroid for intra-articular therapy. , 1967, Annals of physical medicine.