Is Habermas on Twitter? : Social Media and the Public Sphere

Jurgen Habermas’s concept of the public sphere remains a major building block for our understanding of public communication and deliberation. Yet ‘the’ public sphere is a construct of its time, and the mass media-dominated environment which it describes has given way to a considerably more fragmented and complex system of distinct and diverse, yet interconnected and overlapping publics that represent different themes, topics, and approaches to mediated communication. This chapter argues that moving beyond the orthodox model of the public sphere to a more dynamic and complex conceptual framework provides the opportunity to more clearly recognise the varying forms that public communication can take, especially online. Unpacking the traditional public sphere into a series of public sphericules and micro-publics, none of which are mutually exclusive but which co-exist, intersecting and overlapping in multiple forms, is crucial for understanding the ongoing structural transformation of ‘the’ public sphere.

[1]  A. Bruns,et al.  Structural layers of communication on Twitter , 2014 .

[2]  Ruth Page,et al.  The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags , 2012 .

[3]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation , 2008, Inf. Polity.

[4]  Jock Given,et al.  Questions & Answers & Tweets , 2011 .

[5]  John Hartley,et al.  The public sphere on the beach , 2006 .

[6]  A. Bruns,et al.  Twitter and Society , 2013 .

[7]  S. Cunningham,et al.  Popular media as public ‘sphericules’ for diasporic communities , 2001 .

[8]  A. Hermida.  From TV to Twitter: How Ambient News Became Ambient Journalism , 2010 .

[9]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[10]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Neither Hayek nor Habermas , 2007 .

[11]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[12]  Craig Calhoun,et al.  Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere , 1992 .

[13]  Alex Burns,et al.  Oblique strategies for ambient journalism , 2010 .

[14]  Scott Wright,et al.  Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation , 2012, New Media Soc..

[15]  L. Manovich,et al.  Trending: The Promises and the Challenges of Big Social Data , 2012 .

[16]  J. Habermas.  Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit : Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft , 1964 .

[17]  Peter Dahlgren.  Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy , 2009 .

[18]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[19]  Counter Public Spheres and Global Modernity , 2003 .

[20]  Axel Bruns,et al.  TWITTER AS A TECHNOLOGY FOR AUDIENCING AND FANDOM , 2013 .

[21]  A. Bruns,et al.  The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics , 2011 .

[22]  A. Bruns,et al.  The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics , 2016 .

[23]  A. Bruns,et al.  #qldfloods and @QPSMedia: Crisis Communication on Twitter in the 2011 South East Queensland Floods , 2012 .

[24]  M. Castells.  Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[25]  Todd Gitlin.  Public sphere or public sphericules , 2002 .

[26]  Nancy Fraser.  Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy , 2016, Public Space Reader.

[27]  Zizi Papacharissi.  A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age , 2010 .