Effect of transformation volume contraction on the toughness of superelastic shape memory alloys

Shape memory alloys (SMAs) exhibit two very important properties: shape memory phenomenon and superelastic deformation due to intrinsic thermoelastic martensitic transformation. To fully exploit the potential of SMAs in developing functional structures or smart structures in mechanical and biomechanical engineering, it is important to understand and quantify the failure mechanisms of SMAs. This paper presents a theoretical study of the effect of phase-transformation-induced volume contraction on the fracture properties of superelastic SMAs. A simple model is employed to account for the forward and reverse phase transformation with pure volume change, which is then applied to numerically study the transformation field near the tip of a tensile crack. The results reveal that during steady-state crack propagation, the transformation zone extends ahead of the crack tip due to forward transformation while partial reverse transformation occurs in the wake. Furthermore, as a result of the volume contraction associated with the austenite-to-martensite transformation, the induced stress-intensity factor is positive. This is in stark contrast with the negative stress-intensity factor achieved in zirconia ceramics, which undergoes volume expansion during phase transformation. The reverse transformation has been found to have a negligible effect on the induced stress-intensity factor. An important implication of the present results is that the phase transformation with volume contraction in SMAs tends to reduce their fracture resistance and increase the brittleness.

[1]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  Mechanics of Transformation‐Toughening in Brittle Materials , 1982 .

[2]  Dirk Helm,et al.  Thermomechanical behavior of shape memory alloys , 2001, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[3]  Jan Van Humbeeck,et al.  Non-medical applications of shape memory alloys , 1999 .

[4]  V. Giessen,et al.  Effect of reversible phase transformations on crack growth , 1995 .

[5]  Toru Inoue,et al.  Stress–strain relation of CuAlNi SMA single crystal under biaxial loading—constitutive model and experiments , 1998 .

[6]  Yiu-Wing Mai,et al.  Crack growth resistance curves in strain-softening materials , 1986 .

[7]  R O Ritchie,et al.  Fatigue-crack propagation in Nitinol, a shape-memory and superelastic endovascular stent material. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  E. Patoor,et al.  Thermomechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys , 1988 .

[9]  Dongyang Li,et al.  Exploration of TiNi shape memory alloy for potential application in a new area: tribological engineering , 2000 .

[10]  Peter K. Liaw,et al.  The fatigue behavior of shape-memory alloys , 2000 .

[11]  Keh Chih Hwang,et al.  Micromechanics modelling for the constitutive behavior of polycrystalline shape memory alloys. II: Study of the individual phenomena , 1993 .

[12]  Wenyi Yan,et al.  A generalized micromechanics constitutive theory of single crystal with thermoelastic martensitic transformation , 1998 .

[13]  Sung Yi,et al.  Fracture toughening mechanism of shape memory alloys due to martensite transformation , 2000 .

[14]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Continuum theory of dilatant transformation toughening in ceramics , 1983 .

[15]  P. Šittner,et al.  Developing hybrid polymer composites with embedded shape-memory alloy wires , 2000 .

[16]  Etienne Patoor,et al.  Thermomechanical Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys , 1989 .

[17]  H. Warlimont,et al.  Thermoelasticity, pseudoelasticity and the memory effects associated with martensitic transformations , 1974 .

[18]  P. Liaw,et al.  Ni-Ti SMA-reinforced Al composites , 2000 .

[19]  Victor Birman,et al.  Review of Mechanics of Shape Memory Alloy Structures , 1997 .

[20]  R. M. Cannon,et al.  Toughening of brittle solids by martensitic transformations , 1986 .

[21]  L. R. Francis Rose,et al.  The martensitic transformation in ceramics — its role in transformation toughening , 2002 .

[22]  Craig A. Rogers,et al.  One-Dimensional Thermomechanical Constitutive Relations for Shape Memory Materials , 1990 .

[23]  S. Yi,et al.  Fracture toughening mechanism of shape memory alloys under mixed-mode loading due to martensite transformation , 2001 .

[24]  Franz Dieter Fischer,et al.  Transformation-Induced Plasticity (TRIP) , 1996 .

[25]  Tony Owen.  Shape Memory Alloys edited by Hiroyasu Funakubo, translated from the Japanese by J.B. Kennedy Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1986 (Price $135.00, circa £75.00) , 1988, Robotica.

[26]  Wenyi Yan,et al.  Micromechanical study on the morphology of martensite in constrained zirconia , 1997 .

[27]  R. L. Holtz,et al.  Fatigue thresholds of Ni-Ti alloy near the shape memory transition temperature , 1999 .

[28]  J. Christian.  Deformation by moving interfaces , 1982 .

[29]  R. O. Ritchie,et al.  Fatigue-crack growth behavior in the superelastic and shape-memory alloy nitinol , 2001 .

[30]  Lucas Delaey,et al.  Thermoelasticity, pseudoelasticity and the memory effects associated with martensitic transformations: Part 1 Structural and microstructural changes associated with the transformations , 1974 .

[31]  Patrick M. Kelly,et al.  Transformation Toughening in Zirconia‐Containing Ceramics , 2004 .

[32]  L. Schetky.  Shape-memory alloys , 1979 .

[33]  Shuichi Miyazaki,et al.  Lüders-like deformation observed in the transformation pseudoelasticity of a TiNi alloy , 1981 .

[34]  Qingping Sun,et al.  Micromechanics modelling for the constitutive behavior of polycrystalline shape memory alloys. I: Derivation of general relations , 1993 .