Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Ponti | C. Benedetto | D. Tota | R. Arisio | M. Mano | M. G. Baù | A. Surace | G. Pasquero | M. Bortolini
[1] Massimo Cristofanilli,et al. Comparing the Performances of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Size vs Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer. , 2019, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.
[2] H. Tsunoda,et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Second‐look Ultrasonography in Predicting Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer Patients , 2019, Clinical breast cancer.
[3] E. Winer,et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[4] K. K. van de Vijver,et al. Identifying pathologic complete response of the breast after neoadjuvant systemic therapy with ultrasound guided biopsy to eventually omit surgery: Study design and feasibility of the MICRA trial (Minimally Invasive Complete Response Assessment). , 2018, Breast.
[5] Yan‐Lin Gu,et al. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection of Pathologic Complete Remission in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Meta‐analysis , 2017, Clinical breast cancer.
[6] C. Catalano,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging tumor regression shrinkage patterns after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: Correlation with tumor biological subtypes and pathological response after therapy , 2017, Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine.
[7] Takuji Iwase,et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathological complete response of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: association with breast cancer subtype , 2016, SpringerPlus.
[8] M. de Boer,et al. Ultrasound is at least as good as magnetic resonance imaging in predicting tumour size post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2016, European journal of cancer.
[9] L. Esserman,et al. How to use magnetic resonance imaging following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. , 2015, World journal of clinical cases.
[10] Yoshiaki Sota,et al. Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients. , 2015, Breast.
[11] H. Ikeda,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging features of breast cancer according to intrinsic subtypes: correlations with neoadjuvant chemotherapy effects , 2014, SpringerPlus.
[12] H. Ulmer,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer with weekly nab-paclitaxel followed by epirubicin and cyclophosphamide--results of a case series. , 2014, In vivo.
[13] J. Wildberger,et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review , 2013, Insights into Imaging.
[14] J. Ahn,et al. Accuracy of MRI for estimating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: Relation to response patterns on MRI , 2007, Acta oncologica.