A comparison of marketing teaching methods in North American and European universities

Purpose – To compare marketing education methods in Europe and North America, and analyse the opinions about effectiveness underpinning educators' choices among available options.Design/methodology/approach – E‐mail questionnaires distributed to a sampling frame extracted from the worldwide directory of the Academy of Marketing Science were completed by 93 marketing academics in North America and 42 in Europe: a 26 per cent overall return rate. Data were analysed by χ2, ANOVA and correspondence analysis.Findings – Three teaching‐and‐learning methods are most common in both environments: practical exercises, case studies and lectures. Europeans tend to rely on lectures and other traditional methods, while Americans make more use of technology‐based alternatives. The approach to the subject in Europe favours practical exercises, for their connection to the real world. Practice in North America reflects a cultural predisposition to personalised teaching, by emphasising face‐to‐face small‐group tutorials and ...

[1]  James R. Hasselback,et al.  A Report of Gender and Professional Age of the Marketing Professorate , 1998 .

[2]  M. Polonsky,et al.  What Are We Measuring When We Evaluate Journals? , 2005 .

[3]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  A Comparison of U.S. and Chinese University Students' Cognitive Development: The Cross-Cultural Applicability of Perry's Theory , 1999 .

[4]  José Oriol Amat Salas.  Aprender a enseñar: una visión práctica de la formación de formadores , 1994 .

[5]  Edmund R. Thompson,et al.  Are Teaching Cases Appropriate in a Mainland Chinese Context? Evidence From Beijing MBA Students , 2000 .

[6]  Kenneth R. Deans,et al.  The position of marketing education , 1995 .

[7]  Louise W. Smith,et al.  The Reality-Based Learning Method: A Simple Method for Keeping Teaching Activities Relevant and Effective , 2004 .

[8]  E. Gummesson.  The new marketing—Developing long-term interactive relationships , 1987 .

[9]  Fiona Salisbury,et al.  Online and face‐to‐face: evaluating methods for teaching information literacy skills to undergraduate arts students , 2003 .

[10]  Irvine Clarke,et al.  Teaching Internationally: Matching Part-Time MBA Instructional Tools to Host Country Student Preferences , 2002 .

[11]  Wearing Trifocals.  Multiple Roles in Responding to Strategic Communications , 2004 .

[12]  Mark R. Young,et al.  Enhancing Learning Outcomes: The Effects of Instructional Technology, Learning Styles, Instructional Methods, and Student Behavior , 2003 .

[13]  M. Polonsky,et al.  Where Are We Going? Perceptions of U.S. Marketing Academics , 2000 .

[14]  J. Sweeney,et al.  A Comparison of Traditional and Web-Based Tutorials in Marketing Education: An Exploratory Study , 2001 .

[15]  M. Kinnell.  International Marketing in UK Higher Education: Some Issues in Relation to Marketing Educational Programmes to Overseas Students , 1989 .

[16]  Catherine T. Atwong,et al.  Internet Technology and the Future of Marketing Education , 1997 .

[17]  Kosaku Yoshida,et al.  The Deming Approach to Education , 1994 .

[18]  Michael Jay Polonsky,et al.  Attitudes about Work Practices, Time Allocation, and Publication Output: Profiles of U.S. Marketing Academics , 2003 .