Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.

OBJECTIVE To provide clinical direction, based on the best evidence available, on laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies and their associated complications. OPTIONS The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline include the classic pneumoperitoneum (Veress/trocar), the open (Hasson), the direct trocar insertion, the use of disposable shielded trocars, radially expanding trocars, and visual entry systems. OUTCOMES Implementation of this guideline should optimize the decision-making process in choosing a particular technique to enter the abdomen during laparoscopy. EVIDENCE English-language articles from Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database published before the end of September 2005 were searched, using the key words laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications. VALUES The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: 1. Left upper quadrant (LUQ, Palmer's) laparoscopic entry should be considered in patients with suspected or known periumbilical adhesions or history or presence of umbilical hernia, or after three failed insufflation attempts at the umbilicus. (II-2 A) Other sites of insertion, such as transuterine Veress CO(2) insufflation, may be considered if the umbilical and LUQ insertions have failed or have been considered and are not an option. (I-A) 2. The various Veress needle safety tests or checks provide very little useful information on the placement of the Veress needle. It is therefore not necessary to perform various safety checks on inserting the Veress needle; however, waggling of the Veress needle from side to side must be avoided, as this can enlarge a 1.6 mm puncture injury to an injury of up to 1 cm in viscera or blood vessels. (II-1 A) 3. The Veress intraperitoneal (VIP-pressure </= 10 mm Hg) is a reliable indicator of correct intraperitoneal placement of the Veress needle; therefore, it is appropriate to attach the CO(2) source to the Veress needle on entry. (II-1 A) 4. Elevation of the anterior abdominal wall at the time of Veress or primary trocar insertion is not routinely recommended, as it does not avoid visceral or vessel injury. (II-2 B) 5. The angle of the Veress needle insertion should vary according to the BMI of the patient, from 45 degrees in non-obese women to 90 degrees in obese women. (II-2 B) 6. The volume of CO(2) inserted with the Veress needle should depend on the intra-abdominal pressure. Adequate pneumoperitoneum should be determined by a pressure of 20 to 30 mm Hg and not by predetermined CO(2) volume. (II-1 A) 7. In the Veress needle method of entry, the abdominal pressure may be increased immediately prior to insertion of the first trocar. The high intraperitoneal (HIP-pressure) laparoscopic entry technique does not adversely affect cardiopulmonary function in healthy women. (II-1 A) 8. The open entry technique may be utilized as an alternative to the Veress needle technique, although the majority of gynaecologists prefer the Veress entry. There is no evidence that the open entry technique is superior to or inferior to the other entry techniques currently available. (II-2 C) 9. Direct insertion of the trocar without prior pneumoperitoneum may be considered as a safe alternative to Veress needle technique. (II-2) 10. Direct insertion of the trocar is associated with less insufflation-related complications such as gas embolism, and it is a faster technique than the Veress needle technique. (I) 11. Shielded trocars may be used in an effort to decrease entry injuries. There is no evidence that they result in fewer visceral and vascular injuries during laparoscopic access. (II-B) 12. Radially expanding trocars are not recommended as being superior to the traditional trocars. They do have blunt tips that may provide some protection from injuries, but the force required for entry is significantly greater than with disposable trocars. (I-A) 13. The visual entry cannula system may represent an advantage over traditional trocars, as it allows a clear optical entry, but this advantage has not been fully explored. The visual entry cannula trocars have the advantage of minimizing the size of the entry wound and reducing the force necessary for insertion. Visual entry trocars are non-superior to other trocars since they do not avoid visceral and vascular injury. (2 B).

[1]  S. Corson,et al.  Safe technique for laparoscopic entry into the abdominal cavity. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[2]  B. Patsner Laparoscopy using the left upper quadrant approach. , 1999, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[3]  A. Kauppila,et al.  Transfundal insertion of a Veress needle in laparoscopy of obese subjects: a practical alternative. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[4]  F. Howard,et al.  Direct laparoscopic cannula insertion at the left upper quadrant. , 1997, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[5]  R. Garry,et al.  Towards evidence‐based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas , 1999 .

[6]  K C Bodily,et al.  Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic procedures. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[7]  B. Bojahr,et al.  Randomized Trial Comparing a Radially Expandable Needle System with Cutting Trocars , 2000, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[8]  T. Janicki The new sensor-equipped Veress needle. , 1994, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[9]  James G. Chandler,et al.  Survey of laparoscopic entry injuries provoking litigation. , 2001, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[10]  G. Markenson,et al.  A randomized comparison of Verres needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. , 1993, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[11]  C. Chapron,et al.  Trocar injuries during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Report from the French Society of Gynaecological Laparoscopy , 1998 .

[12]  B. M. Cohen,et al.  Fundamentals of peritoneal access. , 2003, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[13]  C. Chapron,et al.  Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[14]  A. Trivedi,et al.  Transuterine insertion of Verres needle for gynaecological laparoscopy at Southland Hospital. , 1994, The New Zealand medical journal.

[15]  Morgan Hr Laparoscopy: induction of pneumoperitoneum via transfundal puncture. , 1979 .

[16]  F Pierre,et al.  Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[17]  A. Harrell,et al.  Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[18]  G. Maddern,et al.  Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  D. Barad,et al.  Incidence of bowel injury due to dense adhesions at the sight of direct trocar insertion. , 1992, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[20]  R. R. Sanders,et al.  TRANSFUNDAL INDUCTION OF PNEUMOPERITONEUM PRIOR TO LAPAROSCOPY , 1974, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[21]  R. Cole,et al.  Laparoscopic entry port visited: a survey of practices of consultant gynaecologists in Scotland , 2001 .

[22]  L. Way,et al.  A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery , 2000, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[23]  P. Yuen,et al.  Randomized Double‐masked Comparison of Radially Expanding Access Device and Conventional Cutting Tip Trocar in Laparoscopy , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  C. Chapron,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynaecologic pathology. Results of a meta-analysis. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[25]  J. Abbott,et al.  An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Veres needle placement at closed laparoscopy. , 2005, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[26]  E. Bieber,et al.  Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. , 1997, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[27]  L. Cravello,et al.  Complications during set‐up procedures for laparoscopy in gynecology: open laparoscopy does not reduce the risk of major complications , 2003, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[28]  H. Reich,et al.  High-Pressure Trocar Insertion Technique , 1999, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[29]  F. Loffer The relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation: implications for laparoscopic technique. , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  V. Gomel Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in gynecologic practice , 1986 .

[31]  N. Merrett,et al.  Use of the Hasson cannula producing major vascular injury at laparoscopy , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[32]  S. Doughan,et al.  Complications of laparoscopic surgery. , 1998, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[33]  D. Turner A new, radially expanding access system for laparoscopic procedures versus conventional cannulas. , 1996, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[34]  A. Golan,et al.  The minilaparoscope as a tool for localization and preparation for cannula insertion in patients with multiple previous abdominal incisions or umbilical hernia. , 2001, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[35]  D. Rosen,et al.  Methods of creating pneumoperitoneum: a review of techniques and complications. , 1998, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[36]  H. Reich,et al.  Peritoneal hyperdistention for trocar insertion , 1999 .

[37]  I. Chi,et al.  LAPAROSCOPIC AND MINILAPAROTOMY FEMALE STERILISATION COMPARED IN 15 167 CASES , 1980, The Lancet.

[38]  F. Giuliante,et al.  Routine use of open technique in laparoscopic operations. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[39]  M. Munro,et al.  Intraabdominal pressure and incision parameters associated with a pyramidal laparoscopic trocar-cannula system and the EndoTIP cannula. , 1999, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[40]  E. Surwit,et al.  Laparoscopy using the left upper quadrant as the primary trocar site. , 1993, Gynecologic oncology.

[41]  G. Kazemier,et al.  Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[42]  D. Seidman,et al.  Laparoscopic appraisal of the anatomic relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation. , 1995, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[43]  C. Y. Liu,et al.  Safe entry techniques during laparoscopy: left upper quadrant entry using the ninth intercostal space--a review of 918 procedures. , 2005, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[44]  N. Taffinder,et al.  Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. , 1996, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[45]  D. Querleu,et al.  Does the use of pneumoperitoneum and disposable trocars prevent bowel injury at laparoscopy? A randomized experimental study in the rabbit , 2003 .

[46]  R. McWilliams,et al.  Laparoscopy: routine pneumoperitoneum via the posterior fornix. , 1975, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[47]  J. McKernan,et al.  Experience With Optical Trocar in Performing Laparoscopic Procedures , 2002, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[48]  Mbbs,et al.  SAFETY OF LAPAROSCOPY , 1978, The Lancet.

[49]  G. Vilos,et al.  Safe laparoscopic entry guided by Veress needle CO2 insufflation pressure. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[50]  R. Woolcott The Safety of Laparoscopy Performed by Direct Trocar Insertion and Carbon Dioxide Insufflation Under Vision , 1997, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[51]  V. Gomel,et al.  Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[52]  H. Hasson A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. , 1971, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[53]  H. Reich,et al.  How much gas is required for initial insufflation at laparoscopy , 1999 .

[54]  F. Wong,et al.  Microlaparoscopic Left Upper Quadrant Entry in Patients at High Risk of Periumbilical Adhesions , 1999, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[55]  G. Vilos Litigation of laparoscopic major vessel injuries in Canada. , 2000, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[56]  J. Dingfelder Direct laparoscope trocar insertion without prior pneumoperitoneum. , 1978, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[57]  G. Buess,et al.  Visually controlled trocar insertion by means of the "optical scalpel". , 1993, Endoscopic surgery and allied technologies.

[58]  S. Silfen,et al.  Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle. , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[59]  S. Furness,et al.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[60]  Frank Willem Jansen,et al.  Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[61]  D. Turner Making the case for the radially expanding access system , 1999 .

[62]  Combination of subcutaneous abdominal wall retraction and optical trocar to minimize pneumoperitoneum-related effects and needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[63]  M. Catarci,et al.  Routine use of open laparoscopy: 1,006 consecutive cases. , 1999, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[64]  P. Gentileschi,et al.  Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[65]  J. Hulka,et al.  DIRECT TROCAR INSERTION AT LAPAROSCOPY: AN EVALUATION , 1983, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[66]  W. Beekhuizen,et al.  Cul‐de‐sac Insufflation: An Easy Alternative Route for Safely Inducing Pneumoperitoneum , 1980, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[67]  S. Lata,et al.  The Direct Trocar Technique: An Alternative Approach to Abdominal Entry for Laparoscopy , 2002, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[68]  R. Pasic,et al.  Laparoscopy in morbidly obese patients. , 1999, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[69]  M. Woods,et al.  Laparoscopy and major retroperitoneal vascular injuries (MRVI) , 1995, Surgical Endoscopy.

[70]  D. Barad,et al.  Direct trocar insertion vs. Verres needle use for laparoscopic sterilization. , 1990, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[71]  H. Dabirashrafi,et al.  Laparoscopy: direct trocar insertion without pneumoperitoneum. , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[72]  H. Morgan Laparoscopy: induction of pneumoperitoneum via transfundal puncture. , 1979, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[73]  W. Schwenk,et al.  The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy.

[74]  T. Kurki,et al.  A Nationwide Analysis of Laparoscopic Complications , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[75]  A. Yuzpe Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy. A survey on possible contributing factors and prevention. , 1990, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[76]  H. So,et al.  Radially expanding trocar: a less painful alternative for laparoscopic surgery. , 2000, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[77]  A. Ternamian A second‐generation laparoscopic port system: EndoTIPTM , 1999 .

[78]  R. Bude,et al.  The Relationship of the Umbilicus to the Aortic Bifurcation: Implications for Laparoscopic Technique , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[79]  I. Brosens,et al.  Bowel injuries during gynaecological laparoscopy: a multinational survey , 2001 .

[80]  R. Golub,et al.  Accuracy of viscera slide detection of abdominal wall adhesions by ultrasound , 1994, Surgical Endoscopy.

[81]  H. Hasson,et al.  Open Laparoscopy: 29‐Year Experience , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[82]  R. Pasic,et al.  Transuterine insertion of Veress needle in laparoscopy. , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[83]  James G. Chandler,et al.  Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[84]  F. Nezhat,et al.  The Incidence of Adhesions After Prior Laparotomy: A Laparoscopic Appraisal , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[85]  L. Price,et al.  Anatomy of the left upper quadrant for cannula insertion. , 2000, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[86]  Artin Ternamian,et al.  How to improve laparoscopic access safety: ENDOTIP , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[87]  T. Krummel,et al.  Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery , 2000, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[88]  David Molloy,et al.  Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry , 2002, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[89]  K. Glass,et al.  Entry force and intra-abdominal pressure associated with six laparoscopic trocar-cannula systems: a randomized comparison. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[90]  G. Vilos,et al.  Effect of body habitus and parity on the initial Veres intraperitoneal CO2 insufflation pressure during laparoscopic access in women. , 2006, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[91]  M. Schäfer,et al.  Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[92]  S. Kaali Introduction of the Opti-trocar. , 1993, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[93]  K. Lam,et al.  Left upper quadrant approach in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery using reusable instruments. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[94]  M. Mintz Risks and prophylaxis in laparoscopy: a survey of 100,000 cases. , 1977, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[95]  H. Hasson Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery , 1999 .

[96]  M. Munro,et al.  Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques , 2002, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[97]  Saidi Mh Direct laparoscopy without prior pneumoperitoneum. , 1986 .

[98]  K. Miyazawa,et al.  Evaluation of the direct trocar insertion technique at laparoscopy. , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[99]  A. Aisen,et al.  Abdominal wall characterization with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. The effect of obesity on the laparoscopic approach. , 1991, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[100]  R. E. Fear Laparoscopy: a valuable aid in gynecologic diagnosis. , 1968, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[101]  K. Semm,et al.  Safe insertion of trocars and the Veress needle using standard equipment and the 11 security steps , 1999 .

[102]  C. Chapron,et al.  ‘Classic’ laparoscopic entry in a university hospital: a series of 8324 cases , 1999 .

[103]  C. Sutton,et al.  Complications of first entry: a pospective laparoscopy audit , 1999 .

[104]  A. Ternamian Laparoscopy without trocars , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[105]  McGurgan,et al.  Optical Veress as an entry technique , 1999 .

[106]  G. Vilos,et al.  High-pressure laparoscopic entry does not adversely affect cardiopulmonary function in healthy women. , 2005, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[107]  G. Fried,et al.  Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. , 1993, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[108]  Mettler,et al.  Optical trocar systems: laparoscopic entry and its complications (a study of cases in Germany) , 1999 .

[109]  G. Maislin,et al.  Measurement of the force necessary for laparoscopic trocar entry. , 1989, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[110]  S. Furness,et al.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.