Towards understanding problem structuring and groups with triple task methodology ‘e’

The many issues which confront Problem Structuring Groups (PSGs) engaging in applying problem structuring methods (PSMs) are well reported in the literature. Often group problem structuring work is well organised around an array of processes and methods which has received wide-ranging testing in the field however, the assessment of the group in terms of its output, group dynamic and self-assessment tends to be handled piecemeal at best. Triple task methodology (TTM) has been described as a means to manage the three group assessments—group output, dynamic and self-assessment in one frame. In this paper an experimental version of TTM (TTMe) is described in use in an Education project setting in Abu Dhabi. It was intended to make TTM less cumbersome and time consuming and, at the same time, more systemically integrated, a significant objective being to make it easier to use by practitioners who have not used it before or who have only small prior use of group assessment methods. The paper describes the application of TTMe, provides an overall assessment of the value of the exercise, discusses the outputs of the group work and points to the value of TTMe in identifying and clarifying unique group qualities or signatures. The major contribution of the paper is to bring to PSG processes a degree of rapid, non-specialist, empirically comparable assessment on the richness of the group use of PSMs.

[1]  Denise A. Bonebright 40 years of storming: a historical review of Tuckman's model of small group development , 2010 .

[2]  John Mingers,et al.  Soft OR comes of age—but not everywhere! , 2011 .

[3]  Yasser Al-Saleh,et al.  Towards an Effective Multi-Stakeholder Consultation Process: Applying the Imagine Method in Context of Abu Dhabi’s Education Policy , 2016 .

[4]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[5]  S. Bell,et al.  An Approach to Comparing External and Internal Methods for Analyzing Group Dynamic , 2013 .

[6]  Alex Voss,et al.  Understanding the Changing Cultural Value of the BBC World Service and the British Council , 2014 .

[7]  Simon Bell,et al.  DPSIR = A Problem Structuring Method? An exploration from the "Imagine" approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Tony Hindle,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World , 1990 .

[9]  Junyi Zhang,et al.  Urbanization and subsurface environmental issues: an attempt at DPSIR model application in Asian cities. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  René Victor Valqui Vidal,et al.  Using soft OR in a small company--The case of Kirby , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  John M. Wilson,et al.  The impact of contingency factors on validation of problem structuring methods , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  S. Bell,et al.  Innovation in Multi-Stakeholder Engagement , 2013 .

[13]  S. Bell,et al.  Imagine coastal sustainability , 2013 .

[14]  Celia Lury,et al.  Inventive methods : the happening of the social , 2012 .

[15]  S. Bell From Sustainable Community to Big Society: 10 years learning with the Imagine approach , 2011 .

[16]  Robert Y. Cavana,et al.  Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Jae-Won Moon Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[18]  Carsten Nico Hjortsø,et al.  Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR--an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Angelika Bayer,et al.  Experiences In Groups And Other Papers , 2016 .

[20]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[21]  N. Macaskill Psychotherapists‐In‐Training Evaluate Their Personal Therapy: Results of a UK Survey , 1992 .

[22]  George Smith,et al.  Group Development: A Review of the Literature and a Commentary on Future Research Directions , 2001 .

[23]  W. Bion Experiences in groups and other papers , 1963 .

[24]  Eric E. Jones,et al.  No pain, no gains: Negative mood leads to process gains in idea-generation groups. , 2009 .

[25]  Jennifer A. Moon Reflection in learning and professional development , 1999 .

[26]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Being, Engaging, Contextualizing and Managing Matrix-a Means for Nonspecialists to Assess Group Dynamics? , 2011 .

[27]  Simon Bell,et al.  Groups and facilitators within problem structuring processes , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  Laurie Skuba Jackson,et al.  Issues Mapping: A problem structuring method for addressing science and technology conflicts , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Elisabeth Coudert,et al.  A practitioner's guide to 'Imagine', the systemic and prospective sustainability analysis , 2005 .

[30]  E. Coudert IMAGINE : A set of tools and methods to assist integrated coastal zone management in the Mediterranean , 2011 .

[31]  E. Sjøvold Systematizing Person-Group Relations (SPGR) , 2007 .

[32]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Rethinking Soft OR interventions: Models as boundary objects , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Gloria J. Galanes,et al.  The SYMLOG dimensions and small group conflict , 1986 .

[35]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited , 2001 .

[36]  L. White,et al.  Evaluating problem-structuring methods: developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSMs , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[37]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Project review and learning in the construction industry: Embedding a problem structuring method within a partnership context , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Linking stakeholder visions with resource allocation scenarios and multi-criteria assessment , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Herbert H Blumberg A Simplified Version of the Symlog® Trait Rating Form , 2006, Psychological reports.

[40]  Simon French,et al.  Facilitation practices in decision workshops , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[41]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Triple Task Method: Systemic, Reflective Action Research , 2010 .