Aims: The aim of this paper is to propose a note on “Soft set theory and uni -int decision making”. Study Design: In this note, we point out by an example that Cagman and Enginoglu’s method is very likely to get an empty decision set. Place and Duration of Study: In a recent paper [Caðman, N., Enginoðlu, S., 2010. Soft set theory and uni-int decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 207, 848-855], Caðman and Enginoðlu constructed an uni-int decision making method which selected a set of optimum elements from the alternatives. Methodology: Furthermore, we present a new approach to soft set based decision making Results: We give some illustrative examples. Conclusion: Two numerical examples illustrate the practicality and effectiveness of the developed approach.
[1]
Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.
Rough Sets
,
1995,
Commun. ACM.
[2]
A. R. Roy,et al.
An application of soft sets in a decision making problem
,
2002
.
[3]
Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.
Fuzzy Sets
,
1996,
Inf. Control..
[4]
Naim Çagman,et al.
Soft set theory and uni-int decision making
,
2010,
Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[5]
D. Molodtsov.
Soft set theory—First results
,
1999
.
[6]
Naim Çag ˘ man,et al.
Soft set theory and uni-int decision making
,
2010
.
[7]
A. R. Roy,et al.
A fuzzy soft set theoretic approach to decision making problems
,
2007
.