Eliciting conceptual models to support interdisciplinary research

Constructing interdisciplinary knowledge is particularly difficult because scientific knowledge is situated in its discipline. Researchers must find common ground to share, and this causes high transaction costs. This article reports a method of conceptual analysis to elicit, analyse and compare conceptual models used by individual researchers, with the ultimate aim to facilitate researchers in sharing these models. Using this method, an analyst derives concepts and their mutual relations from documents, and defines them in natural language. We qualitatively analysed all writings of four researchers from an interdisciplinary research project and validated the resulting conceptual models in semi-structured interviews. The method was found to be effective in eliciting concepts, even those used implicitly. The interviews also revealed mechanisms by which researchers adopt new concepts or choose particular terms. The analysis costs are high but not prohibitive, and are shown to diminish with each researcher added to the analysis.

[1]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. , 1998 .

[2]  Marina du Plessis,et al.  The role of knowledge management in innovation , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[5]  Stephen. Jones,et al.  Standardising the elimination of unnecessary data from interview transcripts for the purposes of knowledge-based systems? A case study , 1996 .

[6]  S. Newell,et al.  Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments , 2003 .

[7]  Boris Hennig.  What is Formal Ontology , 2004 .

[8]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  New approaches to constructivist knowledge acquisition tool development , 1993 .

[9]  Jan van der Meij,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations , 1998 .

[10]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Visualization for constructing and sharing geo-scientific concepts , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Contributing to Discourse , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Visualizing Science by Citation Mapping , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[14]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  A Suite of Daml+Oil Ontologies to Describe Bioinformatics Web Services and Data , 2003, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[15]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Knowledge Management Metrics: A Review and Directions for Future Research , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[16]  Steffen Staab,et al.  CREAM: CREAting Metadata for the Semantic Web , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[17]  J. Novak.  The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How To Construct Them , 2004 .

[18]  Don R. Swanson,et al.  Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Victoria S. Uren,et al.  Sensemaking tools for understanding research literatures: Design, implementation and user evaluation , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  G. Tress,et al.  Researchers’ Experiences, Positive and Negative, in Integrative Landscape Projects , 2005, Environmental management.

[21]  Johanna Völker,et al.  Ontology Learning and Reasoning - Dealing with Uncertainty and Inconsistency , 2005, ISWC-URSW.

[22]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[23]  Daniel Pfeiffer,et al.  A framework for comparing conceptual models , 2005, EMISA.

[24]  Enrico Motta,et al.  The Knowledge modelling paradigm in knowledge engineering , 2001 .

[25]  Andrew Kakabadse,et al.  Reviewing the knowledge management literature: towards a taxonomy , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[27]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  S. Brison.  The Intentional Stance , 1989 .

[29]  Arthur Stutt,et al.  MnM: Ontology Driven Semi-automatic and Automatic Support for Semantic Markup , 2002, EKAW.

[30]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[31]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Wim H. Gijselaers,et al.  Common Ground, Complex Problems and Decision Making , 2006 .

[33]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches , 2005, J. Data Semant..

[34]  Guus Schreiber,et al.  Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology , 1999 .

[35]  E. Wenger.  Communities of practice: Learning , 1998 .

[36]  John R. Searle,et al.  Minds, brains, and programs , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  Matthew Hall,et al.  Knowledge management and the limits of knowledge codification , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[39]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[40]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Structured Development of Problem Solving Methods , 2001, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[41]  P. Leroy.  Sciences environnementales et interdisciplinarit: une rflexion partant de dbats aux Pays-Bas , 2004 .

[42]  Bernard Meltzer,et al.  Brains and Programs , 1977, International Computing Symposium.

[43]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Support for the sense-making activity of managers , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[44]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[45]  Neil R. Smalheiser,et al.  Artificial Intelligence An interactive system for finding complementary literatures : a stimulus to scientific discovery , 1995 .

[46]  Siegfried Handschuh,et al.  Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art , 2006, J. Web Semant..

[47]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Functionalities for automatic metadata generation applications: a survey of metadata experts' opinions , 2006, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[48]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[49]  Yuya Kajikawa,et al.  Filling the gap between researchers studying different materials and different methods: a proposal for structured keywords , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[50]  William Y. Arms.  Automated Digital Libraries: How Effectively Can Computers Be Used for the Skilled Tasks of Professional Librarianship? , 2000, D Lib Mag..

[51]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[52]  R. Paton,et al.  Interpreting, Representing and Integrating Scientific Knowledge from Interdisciplinary Projects , 2007 .

[53]  P. T. P. OLIVER,et al.  Citation Indexing for Studying Science , 1970, Nature.

[54]  S. Fuchs,et al.  The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge , 1992 .

[55]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[56]  Gary P. Kofinas,et al.  Ten Heuristics for Interdisciplinary Modeling Projects , 2002, Ecosystems.

[57]  Michael Kohlhase,et al.  Communities of Practice in MKM: An Extensional Model , 2006, MKM.

[58]  J. D. Trout,et al.  The Theory of Knowledge: A Thematic Introduction , 1997 .

[59]  Ference Marton,et al.  Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality , 1986 .

[60]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  R. A. Nelson,et al.  Common ground. , 2020, Lancet.

[62]  Jasminko Novak,et al.  Helping Knowledge Cross Boundaries: Using Knowledge Visualization to Support Cross-Community Sensemaking , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[63]  Vito Pirrelli,et al.  NLP-based Ontology Learning from Legal Texts. A Case Study , 2007, LOAIT.

[64]  K. Himma.  From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis , 2003 .

[65]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods , 1998, Data Knowl. Eng..

[66]  Guus Schreiber,et al.  Conceptual modelling for knowledge based systems , 2002 .