The Importance of Check-Cashing Businesses to the Unbanked: Racial/Ethnic Differences

The roughly 9.5 percent of all U.S. families that are without some type of transaction account (unbanked) are disproportionately represented by minorities. The unbanked often must rely on alternative ways to carry out basic financial transactions such as cashing payroll checks and paying bills. This study analyzes unique survey data and finds that a consumer's decision to patronize check-cashing businesses is jointly made with the decision to be unbanked. For the unbanked, these businesses are an important source for financial services. Attributes that contribute to these decisions, however, vary for each racial/ethnic group. Latent preference effects are also observed to influence this joint decision for Blacks and Hispanics. These findings may explain in part why the provisions of the Debt Collection Improvement Act (DCIA) of 1996 have not been more successful in bringing unbanked federal benefits recipients into the financial mainstream. ; Consumer participation in mainstream financial markets can improve their ability to build assets and create wealth, protect them from theft and discriminatory, predatory or unsavory lending practices, and may promote economic stability and vitality in the communities where they reside. By more fully understanding a consumer's financial decisions, policies can be better directed to improve the effectiveness of legislation such as the DCIA of 1996 in encouraging mainstream financial market participation.

[1]  Ana Aizcorbe,et al.  Recent changes in U.S. family finances: evidence from the 1998 and 2001 Survey of Consumer Finances , 2003 .

[2]  William H. Greene,et al.  Gender Economics Courses in Liberal Arts Colleges: Further Results , 1998 .

[3]  L. Lau,et al.  The sources of Asian Pacific economic growth , 1996 .

[4]  W. Greene,et al.  The role of alternative financial service providers in serving LMI neighborhoods , 2001 .

[5]  J. Caskey.  Lower Income Americans, Higher Cost Financial Services , 1997 .

[6]  C. R. Dunham.  The role of banks and nonbanks in serving low- and moderate income communities , 2001 .

[7]  Arthur B. Kennickell,et al.  Recent changes in U. S. family finances: results from the 1998 Survey of Consumer Finances , 2000 .

[8]  Thanasis Stengos,et al.  Corrigendum to "On the calculation of marginal effects in the bivariate probit model" [Econ. Lett. 54, (1997) 203-208] , 2000 .

[9]  J. Caskey.  Fringe Banking: Check-Cashing Outlets, Pawnshops, and the Poor , 1994 .

[10]  W. Jackson,et al.  Impact of Independent Directors and the Regulatory Environment on Bank Merger Prices: Evidence from Takeover Activity in the 1990s , 2000 .

[11]  E. Prescott,et al.  Means of Payment, the Unbanked, and EFT '99 , 1999 .

[12]  J. Hogarth,et al.  Banking Relationships of Lower-Income Families and the Governmental Trend toward Electronic Payment , 1999 .

[13]  Thomas M. Shapiro,et al.  Black Wealth, White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. , 1995 .

[14]  Thanasis Stengos,et al.  On the calculation of marginal effects in the bivariate probit model , 1997 .

[15]  Jose A. Lopez,et al.  How Effective is Lifeline Banking in Assisting the 'Unbanked'? , 1998 .

[16]  Martha A. Starr,et al.  Family finances in the U.S.: recent evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances , 1997 .