Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas.

This study examined the contributions of two previously identified brain regions-the extrastriate and fusiform body areas (EBA and FBA)-to the visual representation of the human form. Specifically we measured in these two areas the magnitude of fMRI response as a function of the amount of the human figure that is visible in the image, in the range from a single finger to the entire body. A second experiment determined the selectivity of these regions for body and body part stimuli relative to closely matched control images. We found a gradual increase in the selectivity of the EBA as a function of the amount of body shown. In contrast, the FBA shows a steplike function, with no significant selectivity for individual fingers or hands. In a third experiment we demonstrate that the response pattern seen in EBA does not extend to adjacent motion-selective human midtemporal area. We propose an interpretation of these results by analogy to nearby face-selective regions occipital face area (OFA) and fusiform face area (FFA). Specifically, we hypothesize that the EBA analyzes bodies at the level of parts (as has been proposed for faces in the OFA), whereas FBA (by analogy to FFA) may have a role in processing the configuration of body parts into wholes.

[1]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[4]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN FUSIFORM FACE AREA , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[11]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or ‘representational momentum’ , 2000, Current Biology.

[12]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[15]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform “face areas” discriminate novel from visually familiar faces , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[18]  P. Downing,et al.  The effect of viewpoint on body representation in the extrastriate body area , 2004, Neuroreport.

[19]  C. Gross,et al.  Representations of faces and body parts in macaque temporal cortex: a functional MRI study. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  P. Downing,et al.  Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  H. Branch Coslett,et al.  Evidence for Multiple, Distinct Representations of the Human Body , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Is the extrastriate body area involved in motor actions? , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Downing,et al.  Within‐subject reproducibility of category‐specific visual activation with functional MRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Rebecca F. Schwarzlose,et al.  Separate Face and Body Selectivity on the Fusiform Gyrus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Is the extrastriate body area involved in motor actions? , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[28]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Patterns of fMRI Activity Dissociate Overlapping Functional Brain Areas that Respond to Biological Motion , 2006, Neuron.

[29]  Lindsey J. Powell,et al.  My body or yours? The effect of visual perspective on cortical body representations. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Domain specificity in visual cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  The role of the extrastriate body area in action perception , 2006, Social neuroscience.

[33]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Overlapping Lateral Occipitotemporal Activations Using Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis , 2006 .