Research on the cultivation of green competitiveness among chinese heavily polluting enterprises under country/district environmental regulations

The development of the world economy has caused serious environmental pollution, which has resulted in an ecological crisis. With the acceleration of economic development, China’s ecological crisis is becoming more serious. Green technology innovation is an important driving force in realizing green economic development, and heavily polluting enterprises are the key link to cultivating green technology innovation. The Porter hypothesis holds that environmental regulation has a promoting effect on enterprises’ green technology innovation, but this is not reflected in the context of China. As a basic administrative unit, the implementation of environmental regulations in counties and districts determines the effectiveness of environmental policies. Utilizing structural equation modeling, this study analyzes the cultivation of the green technology innovation ability of heavily polluting enterprises under environmental regulations. The results show that command-based environmental regulation can effectively promote enterprises’ green technology innovation ability. Incentive-based environmental regulation needs to be strengthened to drive the development of enterprises’ “three wastes” treatment innovation ability. Voluntary environmental regulation does not effectively promote green process innovation and “three wastes” treatment innovation. In addition, enterprises’ current “three wastes” treatment innovation capacity is not enough to promote the improvement of enterprises’ green competitiveness. The results of this article show that environmental regulation is conducive to the green innovation ability of enterprises, and this promotion effect needs to be further strengthened. Moreover, the highlighted research limitations will contribute to the subsequent research work.

[1]  T. Adebayo Environmental consequences of fossil fuel in Spain amidst renewable energy consumption: a new insights from the wavelet-based Granger causality approach , 2022 .

[2]  Kyle S. Herman,et al.  Channeled through trade: How foreign environmental regulations induce domestic renewable energy innovation , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[3]  Yuzhou Deng,et al.  Spatial Spillover Effect and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Transportation Infrastructure on Economic Growth: A Case of the Yangtze River Delta , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[4]  Kerui Du,et al.  Does more stringent environmental regulation induce firms' innovation? Evidence from the 11th Five-year plan in China , 2022, Energy Economics.

[5]  A. Alola,et al.  Does it take international integration of natural resources to ascend the ladder of environmental quality in the newly industrialized countries? , 2022, Resources Policy.

[6]  Mingyue Fan,et al.  Impact of Green Logistics Performance on China’s Export Trade to Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Countries , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[7]  Sikandar Ali Qalati,et al.  Green Supply Chain Management and Corporate Performance Among Manufacturing Firms in Pakistan , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[8]  Wei-ping Wu,et al.  Impact of Voluntary Environmental Regulation on Green Technological Innovation: Evidence From Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises , 2022, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[9]  Yue‐Jun Zhang,et al.  The effect of environmental regulation and skill premium on the inflow of FDI:Evidence from Chinese industrial sectors , 2022, International Review of Economics & Finance.

[10]  Zeeshan Fareed,et al.  Financial inclusion and the environmental deterioration in Eurozone: The moderating role of innovation activity , 2022, Technology in Society.

[11]  D. Ostic,et al.  Research on the Green Technology Innovation Cultivation Path of Manufacturing Enterprises Under the Regulation of Environmental Protection Tax Law in China , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[12]  N. Qureshi,et al.  Urban Resilience and Transportation Infrastructure Level in the Yangtze River Delta , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[13]  Mohammad Mahtab Alam,et al.  A Novel Investigation to Explore the Impact of Renewable Energy, Urbanization, and Trade on Carbon Emission in Bhutan , 2022, Energies.

[14]  T. Adebayo Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Sustainability in Canada: Does Political Stability Make a Difference? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[15]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Testing the role of economic complexity on the ecological footprint in China: a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach , 2022, Energy & Environment.

[16]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Estimating interlinks of carbon emissions from transportation, industrialization, and solid/liquid fuels with economic progress: evidence from Pakistan , 2022, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[17]  Haozhi Pan,et al.  Do compact cities have higher efficiencies of agglomeration economies? A dynamic panel model with compactness indicators , 2022, Land Use Policy.

[18]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Revealing the dynamic effects of fossil fuel energy, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and carbon emissions on Pakistan’s economic growth , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[19]  Jing Yang,et al.  Stringent environmental regulation and capital structure: The effect of NEPL on deleveraging the high polluting firms , 2022, International Review of Economics & Finance.

[20]  Wei Wang,et al.  Does China's carbon emissions trading scheme affect the market power of high-carbon enterprises? , 2022, Energy Economics.

[21]  Huaping Sun,et al.  The impact of the pollution permits system on green innovation: Evidence from the county-level data in China , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[22]  Di Zhou,et al.  Voluntary environmental regulation and urban innovation: Evidence from low-carbon pilot cities program in China , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[23]  Xuewen Li,et al.  The Impact of Air Pollution Perception on Urban Settlement Intentions of Young Talent in China , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[24]  Benhong Peng,et al.  Can environmental regulation promote green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China , 2022, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[25]  S. Kamel,et al.  Drivers of environmental degradation in Turkey: Designing an SDG framework through advanced quantile approaches , 2022, Energy Reports.

[26]  C. Zhuo,et al.  Can cross-regional environmental protection promote urban green development: Zero-sum game or win-win choice? , 2021, Energy Economics.

[27]  A. Rehman,et al.  The Energy Mix Dilemma and Environmental Sustainability: Interaction among Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Nuclear Energy, Urban Agglomeration, and Economic Growth , 2021, Energies.

[28]  Ruihan Zhang,et al.  Market failure, tradable discharge permit, and pollution reduction: Evidence from industrial firms in China , 2021 .

[29]  Lirong Yin,et al.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of Haze in Beijing Based on the Multi-Convolution Model , 2021, Atmosphere.

[30]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Sustainable development and pollution: the effects of CO2 emission on population growth, food production, economic development, and energy consumption in Pakistan , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[31]  Dan Pan,et al.  Border pollution reduction in China: The role of livestock environmental regulations , 2021 .

[32]  Yanlin Yang,et al.  Environmental regulation, environmental responsibility, and green technology innovation: Empirical research from China , 2021, PloS one.

[33]  A. Rehman,et al.  The Impact of Globalization, Energy Use, and Trade on Ecological Footprint in Pakistan: Does Environmental Sustainability Exist? , 2021, Energies.

[34]  Qaisar Abbas,et al.  Exploring a pathway to carbon neutrality via reinforcing environmental performance through green process innovation, environmental orientation and green competitive advantage. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  A. Rehman,et al.  A pathway toward future sustainability: Assessing the influence of innovation shocks on CO2 emissions in developing economies , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[36]  Syed Mir Muhammad Shah,et al.  Effects of Social Media Use on Psychological Well-Being: A Mediated Model , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[37]  Recep Ulucak,et al.  Carbonization and atmospheric pollution in China: The asymmetric impacts of forests, livestock production, and economic progress on CO2 emissions. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  G. Tu,et al.  A study of the dual-target corporate environmental behavior (DTCEB) of heavily polluting enterprises under different environment regulations: Green innovation vs. pollutant emissions , 2021 .

[39]  T. Jiang,et al.  How environmental regulations and corporate social responsibility affect the firm innovation with the moderating role of Chief executive officer (CEO) power and ownership concentration? , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[40]  Xiaoping Li,et al.  The impact of the spatial agglomeration of foreign direct investment on green total factor productivity of Chinese cities. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  V. Cvetkovic,et al.  Socioecological informed comparative modeling to promote sustainable urban policy transitions: Case study in Chicago and Stockholm , 2021 .

[42]  Ruoyu Yang,et al.  Does government behaviour or enterprise investment improve regional innovation performance? - evidence from China , 2021, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[43]  J. Cailou,et al.  Environmental information disclosure, political connections and innovation in high-polluting enterprises. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[44]  F. Silvestri,et al.  Innovation in the solid waste management industry: Integrating neoclassical and complexity theory perspectives. , 2020, Waste management.

[45]  Xuezhou Wen,et al.  Do leverage decisions mediate the relationship between board structure and insolvency risk? A comparative mediating role of capital structure and debt maturity , 2020 .

[46]  Jun Sun,et al.  Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[47]  Hu Zhang,et al.  How Environmental Regulations Affect the Efficiency of Green Technology Innovation? , 2020 .

[48]  Jie Wu,et al.  A DEA-based improvement of China's green development from the perspective of resource reallocation. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[49]  T. Bernauer,et al.  Greening the Economy through Voluntary Private Sector Initiatives or Government Regulation? A Public Opinion Perspective , 2020, Environmental Science & Policy.

[50]  Ning Zhang,et al.  The drivers of China’s regional green productivity, 1999–2013 , 2020 .

[51]  Jason M. Walter,et al.  Environmental Policies and Political Feasibility: Eco-Labels versus Emission Taxes , 2019, Economic Analysis and Policy.

[52]  Feitao Jiang,et al.  Environmental regulations, environmental governance efficiency and the green transformation of China's iron and steel enterprises , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[53]  Jie Yang,et al.  Environmental policy, tax, and the target of sustainable development , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[54]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Economic growth model, structural transformation, and green productivity in China , 2017 .

[55]  D. Wield,et al.  Regulation as a means for the social control of technology , 1994 .