Effects of Processing on the Acceptability of "Frozen" Extraposed Constituents

In syntactic theory, `freezing' refers to the idea that a constituent extraposed to a non-canonical position is resistant to extraction of any of its subconstituents (What did Terry see a movie yesterday about ?). The unacceptability of such examples, compared to minimally different sentences without extraposition, has been claimed to be a result of a grammatical constraint on dependency formation, e.g. Ross' (1967) Frozen Structure Constraint. Here, we argue that the gradient pattern of acceptability associated with such examples is better explained in terms of processing complexity. Experimental evidence from a controlled acceptability task shows that the total penalty for extraction from extraposed constituents is predictable from the summed acceptability penalties independently linked to extraction and extraposition. As prior research links both of these displacement phenomena to increased processing costs, we conclude that a grammar of unbounded dependencies in English does not require a `freezing' constraint for the explanation of these cases.

[1]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[2]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[3]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Using Mechanical Turk to Obtain and Analyze English Acceptability Judgments , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[5]  I. Sag,et al.  Locality and Accessibility in Wh-Questions , 2007 .

[6]  J. Henderson,et al.  Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences ☆ , 1991 .

[7]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Jon Sprouse,et al.  A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects , 2012 .

[9]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Of minds and language : a dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque country , 2009 .

[11]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The processing of extraposed structures in English , 2012, Cognition.

[12]  D. Terence Langendoen,et al.  An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability , 1977 .

[13]  Noam Chomsky.  Current Issues in Linguistic Theory , 1964 .

[14]  Laura Staum Casasanto,et al.  Islands in the grammar? Standards of evidence , 2013 .

[15]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Conditions on transformations , 1971 .

[16]  Jon Sprouse,et al.  Revisiting Satiation: Evidence for an Equalization Response Strategy , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[17]  H E Wanner,et al.  An ATN approach to comprehension , 1978 .

[18]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Understanding acceptability judgments: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments , 2010 .

[19]  Rui P. Chaves,et al.  An expectation-based account of subject islands and parasitism1 , 2012, Journal of Linguistics.

[20]  Ivano Caponigro,et al.  Isolating Processing Factors in Negative Island Contexts , 2010 .

[21]  Z. Pylyshyn.  The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[22]  E. Gibson.  The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[23]  Robert Kluender,et al.  Are Subject Islands Subject to a Processing Account , 2004 .

[24]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[25]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  A RECONSIDERATION OF DATIVE MOVEMENTS , 1971 .

[26]  Inbal Arnon,et al.  The source ambiguity problem : Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments , 2011 .

[27]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Effects of Processing Difficulty on Judgments of Acceptability , 2004 .

[28]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Philip Hofmeister,et al.  Representational complexity and memory retrieval in language comprehension , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.

[30]  Robert Kluender,et al.  Subjacency as a processing phenomenon , 1993 .

[31]  M. Tanenhaus.  Afterword The impact of “The cognitive basis for linguistic structures” , 2013 .

[32]  Robin S. Chapman.  The Interpretation of Deviant Sentences in English: A Transformational Approach , 1974 .

[33]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Formal Principles of Language Acquisition , 1980 .

[34]  W. Tabor,et al.  Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Processing effects in linguistic judgment data: (super-)additivity and reading span scores* , 2014, Language and Cognition.

[36]  Frank Keller,et al.  Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality , 2001 .

[37]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[38]  I. Sag,et al.  Cognitive constraints and island effects , 2010, Language.

[39]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Finitary models of language users , 1963 .

[40]  Carson T. Schütze.  The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology , 1998 .

[41]  Ángel Gallego de Nova.  On Freezing Effects , 2009 .

[42]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[43]  Ilkyu Kim,et al.  Rethinking “island effects” in Korean relativization , 2013 .

[44]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Scaling of grammaticalness of self-embedded English sentences , 1968 .

[45]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  J. Hawkins.  Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[47]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[48]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base , 2007 .

[49]  Robert E. Kluender.  Cognitive constraints on variables in syntax , 1993 .

[50]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[52]  Helen Goodluck,et al.  Introduction: Formal vs. processing explanations of linguistic phenomena , 2013 .

[53]  Wayne Cowart,et al.  Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments , 1997 .

[54]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. , 1998 .

[55]  Diogo Almeida,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics: The role of experimental syntax in an integrated cognitive science of language , 2013 .

[56]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[57]  Ángel J. Gallego.  On Freezing Effects , 2010 .

[58]  C. Phillips.  The Real-Time Status of Island Phenomena , 2007 .

[59]  J. Hawkins.  PROCESSING COMPLEXITY AND FILLER-GAP DEPENDENCIES ACROSS GRAMMARS , 1999 .

[60]  M. Kutas,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Effects of NP type in reading cleft sentences in English , 2005 .

[62]  Hajime Ono,et al.  Reverse Island Effects and the Backward Search for a Licensor in Multiple Wh-Questions , 2011 .

[63]  P. Deane.  Limits to attention: A cognitive theory of island phenomena , 1991 .

[64]  Tessa C. Warren,et al.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity , 2002, Cognition.

[65]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[66]  Robert Kluender,et al.  On the distinction between strong and weak islands: a processing perspective , 1998 .

[67]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[68]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Gradience in Linguistic Data , 2005 .

[69]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[70]  Geoffrey J. Huck,et al.  Extraposition and focus , 1990 .

[71]  Sam Featherston,et al.  Three types of exceptions – and all of them rule-based , 2011 .

[72]  Robert Kluender,et al.  Deriving Island Constraints from Principles of Predication , 1992 .

[73]  C. Phillips.  Some arguments and nonarguments for reductionist accounts of syntactic phenomena , 2013 .

[74]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Understanding acceptability judgments: Additivity and working memory effects , 2010 .

[75]  Ken Ramshøj Christensen,et al.  Escape from the Island: Grammaticality and (Reduced) Acceptability of wh-island Violations in Danish , 2013, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[76]  Jon Sprouse.  A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[77]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Wh-Movement , 1977 .