Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes

Abstract Understanding the simultaneous forward water flux and reverse draw solute flux in osmotically driven membrane processes is essential to the development of these emerging technologies. In this work, we investigate the reverse fluxes of three neutral draw solutes-urea, ethylene glycol, and glucose-across an asymmetric forward osmosis membrane. Our experiments reveal that for the rapidly permeating draw solutes (urea and ethylene glycol), an additional resistance to mass transfer develops due to external concentration polarization on the feed side of the membrane. A model to predict the reverse flux for these highly permeable solutes is derived and then validated using independently determined transport parameters. The experimentally measured water fluxes generated by these solutes are consistently lower than those predicted by theories for calculating the water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes-even when the effects of external concentration polarization are taken into account. These results are indicative of a coupling between the forward water flux and reverse solute flux, and a reflection coefficient is introduced to account for the solute–solvent coupling. Interestingly, our experiments demonstrate that solute–solvent coupling does not significantly impact the reverse flux of draw solute. The effect of this solute–solvent coupling on the reverse flux selectivity (i.e., the ratio of the forward water flux to the reverse solute flux) is demonstrated.

[1]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications , 2010 .

[2]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis , 2009 .

[3]  Qian Yang,et al.  A novel dual-layer forward osmosis membrane for protein enrichment and concentration , 2009 .

[4]  O. Kedem,et al.  Determination of concentration-dependent transport coefficients in nanofiltration: Defining an optimal set of coefficients , 2008 .

[5]  Jeffrey R. McCutcheon,et al.  Dewatering press liquor derived from orange production by forward osmosis , 2011 .

[6]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[7]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[8]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Boric acid permeation in forward osmosis membrane processes: modeling, experiments, and implications. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[11]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space: II. Combined direct osmosis, osmotic distillation, and membrane distillation for treatment of metabolic wastewater , 2005 .

[12]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2009 .

[13]  Qian Yang,et al.  Dual-layer hollow fibers with enhanced flux as novel forward osmosis membranes for water production. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane , 2010 .

[15]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[16]  Richard E. Kravath,et al.  Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis , 1975 .

[17]  W. Phillip,et al.  Seeking an ammonia selective membrane based on nanostructured sulfonated block copolymers , 2009 .

[18]  G. Watt,et al.  Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Urea , 1954 .

[19]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems , 1984 .

[21]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Jincai Su,et al.  Sublayer structure and reflection coefficient and their effects on concentration polarization and me , 2011 .

[23]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[24]  Michael Flynn,et al.  Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space Part I. Direct osmotic concentration as pretreatment for reverse osmosis , 2005 .

[25]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Concentration of brine by forward osmosis: Performance and influence of membrane structure , 2008 .

[26]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Pressure retarded osmosis: From the vision of Sidney Loeb to the first prototype installation — Review , 2010 .

[27]  Rong Wang,et al.  Fabrication of novel poly(amide–imide) forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with a positively charged nanofiltration-like selective layer , 2011 .

[28]  E. A. Mason,et al.  Test of the Onsager relation for ideal gas transport in membranes , 1972 .

[29]  Ming Ming Ling,et al.  Facile synthesis of thermosensitive magnetic nanoparticles as "smart" draw solutes in forward osmosis. , 2011, Chemical communications.

[30]  R. Baker.  Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[31]  Gary L. Amy,et al.  Hydrophilic Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, and Performance in Forward Osmosis Processes , 2011 .

[32]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and , 2011 .

[33]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[34]  H. Lonsdale,et al.  Permeability of cellulose acetate membranes to selected solutes , 1971 .

[35]  A. Zelman.  Membrane permeability. , 1972, Current opinion in cell biology.

[36]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  A. Katchalsky,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. , 1958, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[38]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[39]  V. Lobo,et al.  Mutual diffusion coefficients in aqueous electrolyte solutions (Technical Report) , 1993 .

[40]  Dezhong Xiao,et al.  The role of physical and chemical parameters on forward osmosis membrane fouling during algae separa , 2011 .

[41]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Highly Water-Soluble Magnetic Nanoparticles as Novel Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis for Water Reuse , 2010 .

[43]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .