Core binding factor acute myeloid leukaemia and c-KIT mutations.

Core binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) represents 5-8% of all AMLs and has a relatively favourable prognosis. However, activating c-KIT mutations are reported to be associated with higher risk of relapse and shorter survival. To verify the incidence and prognostic value of c-KIT mutations in CBF AML, we retrospectively analysed bone marrow samples of 23 consecutive adult patients with de novo CBF AML [14 inv(16) and 9 t(8;21)] treated at a single institution from 2000 to 2011. All patients received standard induction chemotherapy with cytarabine, idarubicin and etoposide; 13 underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. c-KIT mutations in exons 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 17 were assessed by PCR amplification in combination with direct sequencing. c-KIT mutations (3 in exon 10 and 4 in exon 17) were detected in 7/23 (30.4%) patients, 3 with t(8;21) and 4 with inv(16). No difference in c-KIT mutation status was observed between cases with inv(16) or t(8;21) alone and cases with additional cytogenetic abnormalities. No association between gender, age, white blood cell and platelet count, peripheral blood and bone marrow blast cells at diagnosis, achievement of complete remission, cytogenetic risk groups and Wilms tumour gene 1 (WT1) levels was found. On the contrary, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values were higher in mutated than in non-mutated patients (p=0.01). Overall survival (OS) rates were longer in CBF compared to the other types of AML and disease-free survival (DFS) was longer in inv(16) than in t(8;21) AML. OS and DFS were similar in mutated and non-mutated CBF AML patients. Our results confirm a better prognosis for CBF AML than all other AML categories, and for inv(16) than t(8;21) AML. However, no prognostic value for c-KIT mutational status was found in our series. The association between LDH levels and c-KIT mutation would indicate a more active proliferation for mutated CBF AML.

[1]  Sang Hyuk Park,et al.  Prognostic impact of c-KIT mutations in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. , 2011, Leukemia research.

[2]  H. Dombret,et al.  Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML): is high-dose Ara-C (HDAC) consolidation as effective as you think? , 2009, Current opinion in hematology.

[3]  J. Starý,et al.  Monitoring of minimal residual disease in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia and the impact of C-KIT, FLT3, and JAK2 mutations on clinical outcome , 2009, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[4]  P. Casali,et al.  c-Kit/PDGFRA Gene Status Alterations Possibly Related to Primary Imatinib Resistance in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  M. Lübbert,et al.  CXCR4 is a prognostic marker in acute myelogenous leukemia. , 2007, Blood.

[6]  H. Gundacker,et al.  The clinical spectrum of adult acute myeloid leukaemia associated with core binding factor translocations , 2006, British journal of haematology.

[7]  H. Dombret,et al.  Incidence and prognostic impact of c-Kit, FLT3, and Ras gene mutations in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) , 2006, Leukemia.

[8]  Gerhard Ehninger,et al.  Prevalence and prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in 1485 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). , 2006, Blood.

[9]  G. Marcucci Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. , 2006, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[10]  Bob Löwenberg,et al.  Mutations in nucleophosmin (NPM1) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): association with other gene abnormalities and previously established gene expression signatures and their favorable prognostic significance. , 2005, Blood.

[11]  C. Steidl,et al.  Refinement of the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) by including LDH as an additional prognostic variable to improve risk assessment in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) , 2005, Leukemia.

[12]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Prognostic factors and outcome of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia patients with t(8;21) differ from those of patients with inv(16): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  K. Döhner,et al.  Individual patient data-based meta-analysis of patients aged 16 to 60 years with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a survey of the German Acute Myeloid Leukemia Intergroup. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  D. Linch,et al.  Flt3 mutations and leukaemia , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[15]  H. Dombret,et al.  Prognosis of inv(16)/t(16;16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a survey of 110 cases from the French AML Intergroup. , 2003, Blood.

[16]  D. Gilliland,et al.  Core-binding factors in haematopoiesis and leukaemia , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  C. J. Chen,et al.  KIT activation is a ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. , 2001, Cancer research.

[18]  L. Sobin,et al.  Mutations in exons 9 and 13 of KIT gene are rare events in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. A study of 200 cases. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.

[19]  K Wheatley,et al.  The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. , 1998, Blood.

[20]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype. , 1998, Cancer research.

[21]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia and t(9; 11)(p22; q23) have a superior outcome to patients with other translocations involving band 11q23: a cancer and leukemia group B study. , 1997, Blood.

[22]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule CD56 is associated with short remission duration and survival in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22). , 1997, Blood.

[23]  Yuri Fedoriw,et al.  Genetic tests to evaluate prognosis and predict therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2010, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[24]  M. Gordon Adverse Prognostic Significance of KIT Mutations in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With inv(16) and t(8;21): A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study , 2008 .

[25]  M. Lübbert,et al.  CXCR 4 is a prognostic marker in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia , 2006 .

[26]  Gerhard Ehninger,et al.  Prevalence and prognostic impact of NPM 1 mutations in 1485 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia ( AML ) , 2006 .

[27]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Early blast clearance by remission induction therapy is a major independent prognostic factor for both achievement of complete remission and long-term outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: data from the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) 1992 Trial. , 2003, Blood.

[28]  J. Bennett,et al.  B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma , 2014 .