The economic burden of vision loss and eye disorders among the United States population younger than 40 years.

OBJECTIVE To estimate the economic burden of vision loss and eye disorders in the United States population younger than 40 years in 2012. DESIGN Econometric and statistical analysis of survey, commercial claims, and census data. PARTICIPANTS The United States population younger than 40 years in 2012. METHODS We categorized costs based on consensus guidelines. We estimated medical costs attributable to diagnosed eye-related disorders, undiagnosed vision loss, and medical vision aids using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and MarketScan data. The prevalence of vision impairment and blindness were estimated using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. We estimated costs from lost productivity using Survey of Income and Program Participation. We estimated costs of informal care, low vision aids, special education, school screening, government spending, and transfer payments based on published estimates and federal budgets. We estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost based on published utility values. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Costs and QALYs lost in 2012. RESULTS The economic burden of vision loss and eye disorders among the United States population younger than 40 years was $27.5 billion in 2012 (95% confidence interval, $21.5-$37.2 billion), including $5.9 billion for children and $21.6 billion for adults 18 to 39 years of age. Direct costs were $14.5 billion, including $7.3 billion in medical costs for diagnosed disorders, $4.9 billion in refraction correction, $0.5 billion in medical costs for undiagnosed vision loss, and $1.8 billion in other direct costs. Indirect costs were $13 billion, primarily because of $12.2 billion in productivity losses. In addition, vision loss cost society 215 000 QALYs. CONCLUSIONS We found a substantial burden resulting from vision loss and eye disorders in the United States population younger than 40 years, a population excluded from previous studies. Monetizing quality-of-life losses at $50 000 per QALY would add $10.8 billion in additional costs, indicating a total economic burden of $38.2 billion. Relative to previously reported estimates for the population 40 years of age and older, more than one third of the total cost of vision loss and eye disorders may be incurred by persons younger than 40 years. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

[1]  G. Berdeaux,et al.  Evaluation of Non-Medical Costs Associated with Visual Impairment in Four European Countries , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[2]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation , 2006 .

[3]  Richard J Willke,et al.  Association between vision loss and higher medical care costs in Medicare beneficiaries costs are greater for those with progressive vision loss. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[4]  Allen Foster,et al.  The magnitude and cost of global blindness: An increasing problem that can be alleviated , 2003 .

[5]  Prevalence and correlates of children's diagnosed eye and vision conditions. , 2006 .

[6]  Michael E. Chernew,et al.  Willingness to Pay for a Quality-adjusted Life Year , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  H. Taylor,et al.  The cost of visual impairment: purposes, perspectives, and guidance. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Emily W. Gower,et al.  Economic impact of visual impairment and blindness in the United States. , 2007, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Rahi,et al.  British Childhood Visual Impairment Study Group , 2003 .

[10]  R. Devol,et al.  An Unhealthy America:The Economic Burden of Chronic Disease , 2007 .

[11]  R. Klein,et al.  The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  J E Keeffe,et al.  The economic impact and cost of visual impairment in Australia , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[13]  A. Subramanian,et al.  The effect of visual impairment on quality of life of children aged 3–16 years , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  W. Manning,et al.  Estimating Log Models: To Transform or Not to Transform? , 1999, Journal of health economics.

[15]  J. Saaddine,et al.  The potential cost-effectiveness of amblyopia screening programs. , 2012, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[16]  The impact of transfer payments on economic growth: John Stuart mill versus Ludwig Von Mises , 2002 .

[17]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Use of econometric models to estimate expenditure shares. , 2008, Health services research.

[18]  D. Fryback,et al.  Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values. , 1998, Medical care.

[19]  M. Mesbah,et al.  Prevalence and burden of self-reported blindness, low vision, and visual impairment in the French community: a nationwide survey. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  Kathleen E Wirth,et al.  The Economic Costs and Benefits of Dog Guides for the Blind , 2008, Ophthalmic epidemiology.