Meeting the challenges of urban river habitat restoration: developing a methodology for the River Thames through central London

The River Thames is a heavily engineered urban system in recovery, though absence of habitat in the reaches through central London has restricted recovery in this area, making habitat creation or improvement a restoration priority. Here we discuss the pre-disturbance Thames, its current ecological status, and then present a methodology for establishing habitat restoration potential through central London. Habitats primarily supporting ecological communities include inter-tidal foreshore and artificial structures, and novel techniques for improving these habitats are under development. It is hoped that such approaches along the Thames will provide a template for habitat creation along other large urban rivers.

[1]  R. Francis,et al.  Waste Not, Want Not: The Need to Utilize Existing Artificial Structures for Habitat Improvement Along Urban Rivers , 2008 .

[2]  D. Booth,et al.  Effectiveness of large woody debris in stream rehabilitation projects in urban basins , 2001 .

[3]  Sarah Lavery,et al.  Flood risk management in the Thames Estuary looking ahead 100 years , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Johan Erlandsson,et al.  The relative importance of habitat complexity and surface area in assessing biodiversity: Fractal application on rocky shores , 2005 .

[5]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Effects of deposited wood on biocomplexity of river corridors , 2005 .

[6]  Nesting Rafts As A Management Tool for a Declining Common Tern (Sterna hirundo) Colony , 1991 .

[7]  D. Gilvear,et al.  Channel dynamics and geomorphic variability as controls on gravel bar vegetation; River Tummel, Scotland , 2006 .

[8]  K. Tockner,et al.  Ecology of Braided Rivers , 2009 .

[9]  L. Fonseca,et al.  Fish utilisation of managed realignments , 2005 .

[10]  Susana Mourato,et al.  Does a Cleaner Thames Pass an Economic Appraisal? , 2005 .

[11]  R. Francis,et al.  Fluvially-deposited large wood and riparian plant diversity , 2008, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[12]  M. Hancock Artificial floating islands for nesting Black-throated Divers Gavia arctica in Scotland: construction, use and effect on breeding success , 2000 .

[13]  A. Gurnell,et al.  Initial establishment of vegetative fragments within the active zone of a braided gravel-bed river (River Tagliamento, NE Italy) , 2006, Wetlands.

[14]  H. Hillebrand,et al.  Biotic habitat complexity controls species diversity and nutrient effects on net biomass production. , 2006, Ecology.

[15]  Angela M. Gurnell,et al.  The role of coarse woody debris in forest aquatic habitats: Implications for management , 1995 .

[16]  F. Douglas Shields,et al.  River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects. , 1997 .

[17]  Paul Elliott,et al.  The recent and rapid spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Great Britain , 2004 .

[18]  K. Tockner,et al.  An extension of the flood pulse concept. , 2000 .

[19]  F. Swanson,et al.  Large wood and fluvial processes , 2002 .

[20]  P. Giller,et al.  Experimental provision of large woody debris in streams as a trout management technique , 2002 .

[21]  K. Tockner,et al.  “Concave islands”: Habitat heterogeneity of parafluvial ponds in a gravel-bed river , 2005, Wetlands.

[22]  A. Rowden,et al.  The impact of encroachment and bankside development on the habitat complexity and supralittoral invertebrate communities of the Thames Estuary foreshore , 1999 .

[23]  M. Power,et al.  Temporal abundance patterns and growth of juvenile herring and sprat from the Thames estuary 1977–1992 , 2000 .

[24]  L. Herborg,et al.  The Invasion of the Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in the United Kingdom and Its Comparison to Continental Europe , 2005, Biological Invasions.

[25]  M. Attrill,et al.  Heavy metal concentrations in sediment from the Thames Estuary, UK , 1995 .

[26]  H. Blokpoel,et al.  Caspian Terns (Sterna caspia) Breed Successfully on a Nesting Raft , 1996 .

[27]  J. Mount,et al.  The influence of relative sediment supply on riverine habitat heterogeneity , 2006 .

[28]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public Health , 2001 .

[29]  Martin J. Attrill,et al.  Ecotone or Ecocline: Ecological Boundaries in Estuaries , 2002 .

[30]  M. Brock,et al.  Seed Banks in Arid Wetlands with Contrasting Flooding, Salinity and Turbidity Regimes , 2007, Plant Ecology.

[31]  J. Wiens Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[32]  J. Kinniburgh Physical and chemical characteristics , 1998 .

[33]  D. Montgomery,et al.  LARGE WOODY DEBRIS JAMS, CHANNEL HYDRAULICS AND HABITAT FORMATION IN LARGE RIVERS , 1996 .

[34]  P. J. Edwards,et al.  A conceptual model of vegetation dynamics on gravel bars of a large Alpine river , 1999, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[35]  P. S. Lake,et al.  Local habitat restoration in streams: Constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota , 2003 .

[36]  F. Lepori,et al.  DOES RESTORATION OF STRUCTURAL HETEROGENEITY IN STREAMS ENHANCE FISH AND MACROINVERTEBRATE DIVERSITY , 2005 .