Teachers’ views of mathematics textbook series in Flanders: Does it (not) matter which mathematics textbook series schools choose?

The debate on the differential effects of mathematics textbook series is a recurrent topic in the research literature. Research results remain inconclusive, pointing to a lack of evidence to decide on the relevance of the selection by schools of a mathematics textbook series. Studies also point to difficulties in comparing textbooks. Recently, in order to examine the influence of mathematics textbook series on student learning, the need to take into account mediating variables between the mathematics textbook series and the enacted curriculum is stressed. This paper focuses on one such mediating variable: teachers’ views of mathematics textbook series. Views of a mathematics textbook series of 814 teachers and mathematics performance results of 1579 students were analysed. The results point out that, with regard to teachers’ views of mathematics textbook series, the question ‘Does it really matter which mathematics textbook series schools choose’ has to be answered positively. Implications of the findings are discussed.

[1]  Ilham Elsaleh.  RESEARCH IN brief: Teachers' Interactions with Curriculum Materials in Mathematics , 2010 .

[2]  J. Remillard.  Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .

[3]  Jeremy Hodgen,et al.  Values and variables: Mathematics education in high-performing countries , 2010 .

[4]  Koeno Gravemeijer,et al.  Methoden in het reken-wiskundeonderwijs, een rijke context voor vergelijkend onderzoek , 1993 .

[5]  M. Schug.  Why Do Social Studies Teachers Use Textbooks? The Answer May Lie in Economic Theory. , 1997 .

[6]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[7]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Whole number concepts and operations , 2007 .

[8]  J. Grégoire,et al.  Mathematical Disabilities—An Underestimated Topic? , 2009 .

[9]  J. Remillard,et al.  Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning , 2004 .

[10]  J. Myron Atkin,et al.  The OECD Study of Innovations in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. , 1998 .

[11]  Cora J. M. Maas,et al.  The Multilevel Approach to Repeated Measures for Complete and Incomplete Data , 2003 .

[12]  David Kauffman,et al.  "Lost at Sea": New Teachers' Experiences with Curriculum and Assessment. , 2002 .

[13]  Jan Terwel,et al.  Learning for mathematical insight: a longitudinal comparative study on modelling , 2003 .

[14]  Lecretia A. Buckley.  Unfulfilled hopes in education for equity: redesigning the mathematics curriculum in a US high school , 2010 .

[15]  H. Swanson,et al.  Math Disabilities and Reading Disabilities , 2009 .

[16]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  The Symbol Precedence View of Mathematical Development: A Corpus Analysis of the Rhetorical Structure of Textbooks , 2002 .

[17]  A. Dowker.  Individual Differences in Arithmetic , 2012 .

[18]  M. Valcke,et al.  Mathematics learning difficulties in primary education: teachers’ professional knowledge and the use of commercially available learning packages , 2010 .

[19]  Textbooks for the teaching of algebra in lower secondary school: are they informed by research? , 2010 .

[20]  J. Hox,et al.  Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling , 2005 .

[21]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 2007 .

[22]  James E. Tarr,et al.  Considerations and Limitations Related to Conceptualizing and Measuring Textbook Integrity , 2011 .

[23]  Birgit Pepin,et al.  Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: a way to understand teaching and learning cultures , 2001 .

[24]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Multilevel Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[25]  J. Remillard.  Curriculum Materials in Mathematics Education Reform: A Framework for Examining Teachers' Curriculum Development , 1999 .

[26]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  Curriculum strategy framework: investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform‐based elementary mathematics curriculum , 2009 .

[27]  William J. Browne,et al.  A User's Guide To Mlwin , 2015 .

[28]  D. Ball,et al.  Reform by the Book: What Is—or Might Be—the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform? , 1996 .

[29]  Constantinos Christou,et al.  Teachers' concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM , 2004 .

[30]  D. Macnab.  Implementing change in mathematics education , 2003 .

[31]  Janine T. Remillard,et al.  Teachers’ Use of Curriculum Materials: An Emerging Field , 2008 .

[32]  Diane Pedrotty Bryant,et al.  Preventing Mathematics Difficulties in the Primary Grades: The Critical Features of Instruction in Textbooks as Part of the Equation , 2008 .