A3 reports for knowledge codification, transfer and creation in research and development organisations

Lean Product Development (LPD) presents ways for companies to restructure and improve their organisations, and an underlying assumption of LPD is that knowledge and learning are critical in such a process. Previous literature suggested that the A3 report could be used as a knowledge carrier in product development, but it has not shown how this could be accomplished. In this paper, we present an approach to use the A3 report to support knowledge management. The approach was developed in collaboration with and tested at an R%D department. The theoretical contribution of the paper is its suggestion of a new way of viewing A3s. The application of the concept of boundary object to the A3 report enables us to use the A3 as a powerful means of transferring knowledge from tacit to explicit forms. The empirical contribution presents the A3 knowledge management structure, which supports knowledge codification, transfer and creation.

[1]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .

[2]  Chris Harty,et al.  Editorial: objects, knowledge sharing and knowledge transformation in projects , 2010 .

[3]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Managing knowledge in platforms: boundary objects and stocks and flows of knowledge , 2010 .

[4]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Another look at how Toyota integrates product development , 1998 .

[5]  K. Goffin,et al.  Customer support and new product development : An exploratory study , 2001 .

[6]  Abd. Rahman Abdul Rahim,et al.  Case study method for new product development in engineer‐to‐order organizations , 2003 .

[7]  E. Shehab,et al.  A3 thinking approach to support knowledge-driven design , 2013 .

[8]  Ludvig Lindlöf,et al.  Practices supporting knowledge transfer – an analysis of lean product development , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[9]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Coordination and control in project‐based work: digital objects and infrastructures for delivery , 2010 .

[10]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Case Study Method , 2009 .

[11]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process And Technology , 2006 .

[12]  Badr Haque,et al.  Characteristics of lean product introduction , 2002 .

[13]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[14]  Gerrit Maarten Bonnema,et al.  System Evolution Barriers and How to Overcome Them , 2010 .

[15]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[16]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management , 2000 .

[17]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[18]  Bohdan W. Oppenheim.  Lean product development flow , 2004 .

[19]  Anja Schulze,et al.  How to Support Knowledge Creation in New Product Development:: An Investigation of Knowledge Management Methods , 2005 .

[20]  Dag Raudberget,et al.  Practical Applications of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering in Industry , 2010 .

[21]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[22]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[23]  Art Smalley,et al.  Understanding A3 Thinking: A Critical Component of Toyota's PDCA Management System , 2008 .

[24]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[25]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[26]  Hugh McManus,et al.  Lean engineering: a framework for doing the right thing right , 2007, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[27]  G. Anand,et al.  Development of a Conceptual Framework for Lean New Product Development Process , 2008 .